Edited Jun. 13, 2022 at 11:14 a.m.
Quoting: Sabresguy1987
Yes it is ridiculous how you take the players best trait away when assessing him... What is folignos? 5 "lets go boys" in the locker room per game? the object of the game is to score goals so typically when a guy is twice as good as the next, more value is provided.
If you're argument is goals, then let's see Olofsson score more than 10 at 5v5, where 90% of hickey is played. His value in his shot that he needs the PP to convert on because with the other team down a man, it's easier for him to actually get into dangerous areas.
If he provided more value than a shot, he wouldn't be mid. Because believe it or not, there's more to goals than just shooting talent. If there wasn't, he'd actually convert more. 20 career 5v5 goals in 188 career games is not impressive at all, especially for a guy with such a good shot. And say what you want about his team being bad, he played almost basically all his hockey with Jack Eichel in 19-20, Olofsson's most productive year.
Again, he doesn't drive play, he doesn't use his shot effectively enough, especially when the teams are even manned, he doemst scare you with elite speed or hands, he doesn't have a two game, he doesmt kill penalties, he isn't a physical player at all, he's disciplined but doesn't draw many penatlies, he doesn't even provide value from being a center or notable leader OR even by having a steal of a contract. Or even being that young. Theoretically, he is already in his prime. Like, what does he provide outside of "damn, he can really fire that thing"?
Honestly, I'm asking.