SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Officer Bobrovsky

Created by: Waffelz
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 17, 2022
Published: Jun. 17, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
He's being shopped aggressively, and there is no way anyone takes him on without retention. Florida needs cap space, and we have a little bit to spare. I doubt he would waive for San Jose, but it's fun to imagine the 3 of the worst contracts in the NHL all on the same team.

I have no idea what a trade would actually look like, this is a shot in the dark. I'm sure he has negative value at 10m, and minimal value at 6.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$750,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
2$750,000
2$1,750,000
5$3,250,000
2$3,250,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Kakko, Kaapo$3,250,000
2023 2nd round pick
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Bobrovsky, Sergei ($4,000,000 retained)
  2. Duclair, Anthony
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (FLA)
FLA
  1. Reimer, James ($1,000,000 retained)
2.
SJS
  1. 2022 6th round pick (ARI)
ARI
  1. Bonino, Nick
  2. Simek, Radim
Additional Details:
Anywhere, any return.
3.
SJS
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Hill, Adin
Additional Details:
Anywhere for 3rd/4th
4.
SJS
  1. 2022 5th round pick (NYI)
NYI
  1. Labanc, Kevin
Additional Details:
Send him back home, or anywhere but here.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the MIN
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$72,013,334$0$382,500$10,486,666
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$894,167$894,167
LW
RFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$916,667$916,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Florida Panthers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:35 p.m.
#1
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
Looking for a sharks view on this…what happened to Lebanc? I really liked his game up until this past year and always felt him to be a player the Canes should look into.

Seems like Sharks fans are ready to shoot him into the Sun in return for any draft pick at this point.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:39 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: Caniac555
Looking for a sharks view on this…what happened to Lebanc? I really liked his game up until this past year and always felt him to be a player the Canes should look into.

Seems like Sharks fans are ready to shoot him into the Sun in return for any draft pick at this point.


He had a slow start, was demoted to the 4th line, and then had a season ending injury. I think he is a good player, but doesn't play defensively sound enough to be a real 3rd/4th line option. He also doesn't generate enough offense to be a genuine 2nd line guy. He's basically a power play specialist making 4.25m/yr, which is way, way, too much.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:42 p.m.
#3
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
When you say defensively sound enough - you are speaking in his own zone I assume. Does he forecheck well - Canes use their wingers differently. Wingers are basically fore checkers and then have to fill in for pinching defenseman. And good lord - we could certainly use some PP goals.

Quoting: Waffelz
He had a slow start, was demoted to the 4th line, and then had a season ending injury. I think he is a good player, but doesn't play defensively sound enough to be a real 3rd/4th line option. He also doesn't generate enough offense to be a genuine 2nd line guy. He's basically a power play specialist making 4.25m/yr, which is way, way, too much.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:45 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 292
Likes: 111
Even some sharks fans afraid of reduild huh.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:45 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: Caniac555
When you say defensively sound enough - you are speaking in his own zone I assume. Does he forecheck well - Canes use their wingers differently. Wingers are basically fore checkers and then have to fill in for pinching defenseman. And good lord - we could certainly use some PP goals.


He's... Lazy. Don't expect hard forechecking, dont expect him to get back at full speed to cover for pinching defensemen. Expect him to sit mostly stationary in the right circle on the power play and either try to snipe top corner or do a no-look behind the legs pass every time he has the puck.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:49 p.m.
#6
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3,601
Quite the salesman! Yeah that’s not gonna work

Quoting: Waffelz
He's... Lazy. Don't expect hard forechecking, dont expect him to get back at full speed to cover for pinching defensemen. Expect him to sit mostly stationary in the right circle on the power play and either try to snipe top corner or do a no-look behind the legs pass every time he has the puck.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:52 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: aktobos71
Even some sharks fans afraid of reduild huh.


No point making AGMs rebuilding when management say they aren't going to do it.

Quoting: Caniac555
Quite the salesman! Yeah that’s not gonna work


I may have undersold him a bit. If he was on a 2.5m deal people wouldn't complain. He got more than he deserved because he helped the team out with the 1m deal the year before, and it's biting us now.
aktobos71 and Caniac555 liked this.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 1:58 p.m.
#8
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 5,107
I could be wrong, but I get the vibe that the reason Florida is offering to retain big money is so they *don't* have to sweeten the deal to move an otherwise decent goalie. I don't think sending Reimer back with retention gets you Duclair & a 3rd on top of Bobrovsky with 4x$4M retained
Waffelz liked this.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 2:02 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
I could be wrong, but I get the vibe that the reason Florida is offering to retain big money is so they *don't* have to sweeten the deal to move an otherwise decent goalie. I don't think sending Reimer back with retention gets you Duclair & a 3rd on top of Bobrovsky with 4x$4M retained


I can take the third out, but I don't think Bobrovsky has any kind of positive value at $6m. The Sharks ask for Reimer at the deadline last year was a 2nd+ sweetener, so adding a little retention gets us Duclair (proving depth scoring that the Sharks desperately need). He's already 33 and his save % isn't bad, but it isn't insane either.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 2:09 p.m.
#10
we miss leo k
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 5,107
Quoting: Waffelz
I can take the third out, but I don't think Bobrovsky has any kind of positive value at $6m. The Sharks ask for Reimer at the deadline last year was a 2nd+ sweetener, so adding a little retention gets us Duclair (proving depth scoring that the Sharks desperately need). He's already 33 and his save % isn't bad, but it isn't insane either.


Duclair just doesn't feel like a guy the Panthers move - he's a 30 goal scorer signed 2x$3M - that's exactly the type of guy a contending team in a cap crunch should be holding on to. I can picture them giving up a prospect or a better pick in that kind of deal before they move Duclair.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 2:19 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
Duclair just doesn't feel like a guy the Panthers move - he's a 30 goal scorer signed 2x$3M - that's exactly the type of guy a contending team in a cap crunch should be holding on to. I can picture them giving up a prospect or a better pick in that kind of deal before they move Duclair.


They don't really have many better picks, but I wouldnt be opposed to a decent prospect. I know nothing about their prospect pool, so I'm not sure who to ask for
Jun. 17, 2022 at 2:20 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 8,141
Likes: 3,628
Quoting: Caniac555
Looking for a sharks view on this…what happened to Lebanc? I really liked his game up until this past year and always felt him to be a player the Canes should look into.

Seems like Sharks fans are ready to shoot him into the Sun in return for any draft pick at this point.


He isn’t a play driver and isn’t great in the defensive zone. When placed with good players he will produce, but when the staff puts him with borderline ahl players his production drops and they wonder why and say he’s bad. He’s a good complimentary piece but at $4.75 mil he’s a pricey one.
FunMustBeAlways liked this.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 4:20 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 2,868
If we’re taking on Bob I’d at least expect to be getting rid of Vlasic. I know you gave SJ Duclair and retain 4M of Bob but that’s still an anchor of a contract.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 4:24 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: Waffelz
He's... Lazy. Don't expect hard forechecking, dont expect him to get back at full speed to cover for pinching defensemen. Expect him to sit mostly stationary in the right circle on the power play and either try to snipe top corner or do a no-look behind the legs pass every time he has the puck.


This is just patently untrue. As in this is all malarkey. There is no NHL player that is lazy. You also don’t take into account his usage from an exceptionally poor coach. I find it bloody hilarious you criticize his defense when last year he was one of the Sharks best defensive forwards up until the point he was sidelined with injury.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 4:28 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: Waffelz
He's... Lazy. Don't expect hard forechecking, dont expect him to get back at full speed to cover for pinching defensemen. Expect him to sit mostly stationary in the right circle on the power play and either try to snipe top corner or do a no-look behind the legs pass every time he has the puck.


Regarding PP usage and being stationary, that’s literally the Sharks PP system. He’s doing what he’s told inside of the umbrella system they are using.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 4:34 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: Waffelz
He's... Lazy. Don't expect hard forechecking, dont expect him to get back at full speed to cover for pinching defensemen. Expect him to sit mostly stationary in the right circle on the power play and either try to snipe top corner or do a no-look behind the legs pass every time he has the puck.


I’m sorry one more. The forecheck they employ has the Center as the F1 90% of the time. As a RW he’s either the F2 or F3 who are literally directed to stay high in the zone and cut off the rim pass or the center outlet pass. Try again with that “doesn’t like to forecheck” junk.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 4:41 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
No need to retain on both goalies. Make Bob’s retain more. That trade is only made if Sharks expect to tank.

Way overpay for Kahk. As much as I like him, he’s still very unproven.

Need to buy out Vlasic. We have better D men in the system.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 5:02 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: FunMustBeAlways
If we’re taking on Bob I’d at least expect to be getting rid of Vlasic. I know you gave SJ Duclair and retain 4M of Bob but that’s still an anchor of a contract.


Unrealistic to offload Vlasic. The whole reason Bob is available is because they need cap space, they would never take $7m back the other way. If you mean getting rid of him to another team I also don't see it. I would expect him to get bought out next summer to finance Timo Meier's new deal.

Quoting: icehawk2006
No need to retain on both goalies. Make Bob’s retain more. That trade is only made if Sharks expect to tank.

Way overpay for Kahk. As much as I like him, he’s still very unproven.

Need to buy out Vlasic. We have better D men in the system.


Which Kahk are you talking about, the Sharks have 2 now? If you mean the goalie, it's possibly an overpay. If it's the forward, you need to overpay a bit on an offer sheet or the Rangers would instantly match. I agree that Vlasic eventually needs to get bought out, but if you can wait a year it's better.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 7:55 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: Waffelz
Unrealistic to offload Vlasic. The whole reason Bob is available is because they need cap space, they would never take $7m back the other way. If you mean getting rid of him to another team I also don't see it. I would expect him to get bought out next summer to finance Timo Meier's new deal.



Which Kahk are you talking about, the Sharks have 2 now? If you mean the goalie, it's possibly an overpay. If it's the forward, you need to overpay a bit on an offer sheet or the Rangers would instantly match. I agree that Vlasic eventually needs to get bought out, but if you can wait a year it's better.


The goalie. It’s definitely an overpay 2x2 is more backup level salary.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 8:07 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: icehawk2006
The goalie. It’s definitely an overpay 2x2 is more backup level salary.


Fair enough, it's just the price I've been seeing around here. If they can bring him back at $1m/yr, I won't complain about it.
icehawk2006 liked this.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 8:11 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: Caniac555
Looking for a sharks view on this…what happened to Lebanc? I really liked his game up until this past year and always felt him to be a player the Canes should look into.

Seems like Sharks fans are ready to shoot him into the Sun in return for any draft pick at this point.


Sharks fans are unrealistically critical without looking at contextual factors. Labanc was mis-utilized on a terrible team by a terrible coach in a terrible system. He was given bottom 6 minutes and expected to produce at a top 6 rate. Still he was only producing slightly under top 6 winger in p/60. Improving in any or all of those areas and he’ll recover back up to top 6 production. His pay is what frustrates a lot of people because they don’t understand he actually gets paid what most W with his production get paid.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 8:12 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: Waffelz
Fair enough, it's just the price I've been seeing around here. If they can bring him back at $1m/yr, I won't complain about it.


Go check out @evolvinghockey. His projection is about 2x2.
Jun. 17, 2022 at 8:31 p.m.
#23
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 787
Likes: 295
Quoting: icehawk2006
Go check out evolvinghockey. His projection is about 2x2.


Now I'm even more confused. You told me I overpaid him at 1.75x2, and now you're telling me that evolving hockey projects him at 2x2? Did you get the 3.25 Kaapo Kakko offer sheet mixed up or something?
Jun. 18, 2022 at 2:38 a.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 374
Likes: 45
Quoting: Waffelz
Now I'm even more confused. You told me I overpaid him at 1.75x2, and now you're telling me that evolving hockey projects him at 2x2? Did you get the 3.25 Kaapo Kakko offer sheet mixed up or something?


Lol. Oops. I read it as 2.75. My bad.
Waffelz liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll