SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Blow it up

Created by: Faceoff
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 25, 2022
Published: Jun. 25, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$7,500,000
5$3,500,000
2$2,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
2$3,000,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (MIN)
ANA
  1. Pearson, Tanner
Additional Details:
Anywhere for a 3rd
2.
PIT
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. 2023 3rd round pick (MIN)
3.
VAN
  1. 2022 3rd round pick (WPG)
TOR
  1. Schenn, Luke
Additional Details:
Anywhere for a 3rd or 4th
4.
COL
  1. Miller, J.T. ($2,600,000 retained)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (WPG)
  3. 2023 4th round pick (NYR)
5.
VAN
  1. Crouse, Lawson [RFA Rights]
ARI
  1. Dickinson, Jason
  2. Myers, Tyler ($1,000,000 retained)
  3. Poolman, Tucker
  4. 2023 2nd round pick (VAN)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$82,500,000$78,264,167$1,250,000$2,000,000$4,235,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,500,000$7,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$891,667$891,667 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 25, 2022 at 4:40 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
I want to hear Colorado fans' thoughts on the trade.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 4:45 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2020
Posts: 870
Likes: 200
pens decline
Jun. 25, 2022 at 4:54 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 6,564
Likes: 3,279
As a fan of neither the Nucks or Avs I gotta think they decline the Miller trade. Girard is a great top 4 d man locked up to a great contract. Miller is a rental. I could see him getting a 1st, great prospect and maybe a 2nd or lesser prospect. I personally don’t think you move a top 4 d man in his mid 20s signed long term for a rental. It’d more than likely need to be a hockey trade for another similar aged player. Thinking of the Johansen and Jones trade a while back.
Xqb15a and turtlemountain liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 4:58 p.m.
#4
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: loganocota
pens decline


No they don't
Jun. 25, 2022 at 4:59 p.m.
#5
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
This isn't really blowing it up
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:04 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 9,035
COL isn’t trading 2 dmen for a rental especially one that’s locked up for half a decade. If they hadn’t had moved Barron and Helleson then you put a lot more consideration into it.
Knuckl3s and turtlemountain liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:14 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
As a fan of neither the Nucks or Avs I gotta think they decline the Miller trade. Girard is a great top 4 d man locked up to a great contract. Miller is a rental. I could see him getting a 1st, great prospect and maybe a 2nd or lesser prospect. I personally don’t think you move a top 4 d man in his mid 20s signed long term for a rental. It’d more than likely need to be a hockey trade for another similar aged player. Thinking of the Johansen and Jones trade a while back.


Johnson is a cap dump. COL moves 11 million dollars out and gets a 1C for 2.6 million at 1 year with the extra cap it isn't out of question they could resign him or use the massive amount of money they open up to keep the team together.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:14 p.m.
#8
Hockey IQ
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 1,484
Quoting: loganocota
pens decline


Quoting: Knuckl3s
This isn't really blowing it up


I don’t know if the trade is exact but it’s in the right track for sure
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:15 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
Quoting: Xqb15a
COL isn’t trading 2 dmen for a rental especially one that’s locked up for half a decade. If they hadn’t had moved Barron and Helleson then you put a lot more consideration into it.


In the above post, I explain the logic.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:16 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
Quoting: Knuckl3s
This isn't really blowing it up


It's the same core but, you move 7 players out.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:18 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
I don’t think Miller makes much sense for the avs
HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:21 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
Quoting: Hullsy09
I don’t think Miller makes much sense for the avs


Colorado and Miller's name has been brought up. I kind of see it as a Kadri replacement.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:34 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 9,035
Quoting: Faceoff
Johnson is a cap dump. COL moves 11 million dollars out and gets a 1C for 2.6 million at 1 year with the extra cap it isn't out of question they could resign him or use the massive amount of money they open up to keep the team together.


Johnson isn’t a cap dump, Millers a rental no Stanley cup contender is trading 2 of their top 5 dmen for a rental.
turtlemountain liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:35 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Xqb15a
Johnson isn’t a cap dump, Millers a rental no Stanley cup contender is trading 2 of their top 5 dmen for a rental.


How is Johnson not a cap dump?
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:43 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
Quoting: Xqb15a
Johnson isn’t a cap dump, Millers a rental no Stanley cup contender is trading 2 of their top 5 dmen for a rental.


Quoting: Knuckl3s
How is Johnson not a cap dump?


He is making 6 million next year and he is playing 3rd pair. You don't think the money could be better spent somewhere else? COL is probably winning the cup this year and will want to keep the band together so they can win more. They have 11 players that are UFA/RFA. Several need a large payday. Johnson is the most expendable asset to free up money.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:46 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 1,090
Quoting: Faceoff
Colorado and Miller's name has been brought up. I kind of see it as a Kadri replacement.


But what happens after one year? He will make the same as kadri. With Byram and Newhook needing contracts soon, they won’t be able to afford a miller extension making him a rental
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:51 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
Quoting: Hullsy09
But what happens after one year? He will make the same as kadri. With Byram and Newhook needing contracts soon, they won’t be able to afford a miller extension making him a rental


By that point hopefully, Colorado will have 2 cups. This trade opens up 11 million in cap for COL. Say Miller signs at 8 Millon which is still a net gain of 3 million in cap.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 5:56 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
Quoting: Faceoff
Johnson is a cap dump. COL moves 11 million dollars out and gets a 1C for 2.6 million at 1 year with the extra cap it isn't out of question they could resign him or use the massive amount of money they open up to keep the team together.


You move out Girard and Johnson and you still need to fill out the roster with defensemen. It’s not hard to find a cheap guy to play bottom pairing minutes, but part of Girard’s appeal is that he’s on a great contract considering the value he brings.

And EJ’s contract sucks but it’s only one more year and then his money goes to MacKinnon/Byram/Newhook.
HOCKEYBOY448 liked this.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:03 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 216
Likes: 101
Quoting: turtlemountain
You move out Girard and Johnson and you still need to fill out the roster with defensemen. It’s not hard to find a cheap guy to play bottom pairing minutes, but part of Girard’s appeal is that he’s on a great contract considering the value he brings.

And EJ’s contract sucks but it’s only one more year and then his money goes to MacKinnon/Byram/Newhook.


These are the exact reasons I thought of why COL wouldn't do it. The question is does the pros out way the cons. That's why I love this trade its really debatable and has a lot of different things to consider. I would say not doing the trade is playing it safe but, if you do it you have a really good chance of getting back-to-back cups. You are the first person that agrees that the EJ contract is garbage. Thank you.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:21 p.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 3,013
Quoting: Faceoff
These are the exact reasons I thought of why COL wouldn't do it. The question is does the pros out way the cons. That's why I love this trade its really debatable and has a lot of different things to consider. I would say not doing the trade is playing it safe but, if you do it you have a really good chance of getting back-to-back cups. You are the first person that agrees that the EJ contract is garbage. Thank you.


Clarifying: garbage because he’s overpaid by $2-3M. But not garbage enough that the Avs need to do anything.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:40 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 938
Likes: 405
Quoting: Knuckl3s
No they don't


I think they do. Garland doesn't have the same value as Marino for Pittsburgh. Marino is on a really good long-term deal for a young RHD, which is a position of weak depth for the Pens. Garland is a good 2nd line winger, but a 1-for-1 between the two players, which this basically is, does not make the Penguins better.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:41 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Haymaker26
I think they do. Garland doesn't have the same value as Marino for Pittsburgh. Marino is on a really good long-term deal for a young RHD, which is a position of weak depth for the Pens. Garland is a good 2nd line winger, but a 1-for-1 between the two players, which this basically is, does not make the Penguins better.


Not everyone agrees that Marino is on a good contract based on what he's done the past two seasons, and Pittsburgh could be in need of some more secondary scoring this summer, so don't say try to downplay the value Garland would bring to them
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:55 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 938
Likes: 405
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Not everyone agrees that Marino is on a good contract based on what he's done the past two seasons, and Pittsburgh could be in need of some more secondary scoring this summer, so don't say try to downplay the value Garland would bring to them


I don't think I am. Yes, Marino's offensive production has not been what it was when he was a rookie. However, he's a great puck-mover and his defense has improved in the past few seasons. Garland is ~$500k more expensive when the Pens essentially need more cap space than they have. I think it's a good contract, but I think Marino's is better for Pittsburgh's needs now, and could end up being much better in the future. As far as secondary scoring goes, we can find options in free agency that don't cost a top 4 defenseman. And I can't stress this enough. Letang is a UFA right now. If Marino is moved, our only nhl-caliber RHD are Chad Ruhwedel and Mark Friedman. Both are bottom pairing guys at best. My point isn't that Marino has higher value than Garland in general. He has much more value to the Penguins specifically than Garland. Garland is an excellent player, but he would not bring enough value to make giving away Marino worth it.
Jun. 25, 2022 at 6:57 p.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Haymaker26
I don't think I am. Yes, Marino's offensive production has not been what it was when he was a rookie. However, he's a great puck-mover and his defense has improved in the past few seasons. Garland is ~$500k more expensive when the Pens essentially need more cap space than they have. I think it's a good contract, but I think Marino's is better for Pittsburgh's needs now, and could end up being much better in the future. As far as secondary scoring goes, we can find options in free agency that don't cost a top 4 defenseman. And I can't stress this enough. Letang is a UFA right now. If Marino is moved, our only nhl-caliber RHD are Chad Ruhwedel and Mark Friedman. Both are bottom pairing guys at best. My point isn't that Marino has higher value than Garland in general. He has much more value to the Penguins specifically than Garland. Garland is an excellent player, but he would not bring enough value to make giving away Marino worth it.


Obviously this is all assuming Letang gets re-signed
Jun. 25, 2022 at 7:04 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 938
Likes: 405
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Obviously this is all assuming Letang gets re-signed


And contract talks have made little progress over the past year. Even still, I think Marino moves the Pens' needle more than Garland no matter how the Letang situation turns out.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll