SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks outlier roster moves

Created by: Boldirev
Team: 2022-23 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 24, 2022
Published: Jun. 26, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
1. Seattle improves their middle six, Vancouver adds annual AAV, reduces term and gets a pick for the discrepancy in ability of the players involved.
2. Inexpensive energy forward for a late pick, could go to any team looking to fill out the bottom of their roster.
3. Flyers are a bit of a dark horse for JT, however the fit is there as no rebuild is apparently on the horizon. JT extends and thrives under Torts. Vancouver gets a young roster player who has plateaued, a young RD and the 1st that brings them Hughes future partner.
4. Vegas gets significant cap relief and a young cost controlled forward. Vancouver adds Roy (who fits nicely in their bottom 6) and picks. Brossoit can be kept to compete for the backup or added in another trade.
5. NJ adds a big RD to improve now, with little long term financial risk. Could go FA route, but $$ and term will be an issue for a similar/better D in a weak RD class. Dipietro gives them a young goalie that should be backing up next year, Brossoit backs up (Campbell?) this year, if they move on from Blackwood. Zacha seems to be on the outs in NJ, not really sure on his value as his numbers seem unremarkable, but he has been connected to Vancouver.
6. Boston has expressed interest in Garland previously and the Canucks have had some interest in DeBrusk. Boston gets arguably the better player and gets rid of a headache, Vancouver gets a decent pick and a bit of a reclamation project who may do well under Boudreau.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$6,500,000
1$1,000,000
1$850,000
1$850,000
1$850,000
3$2,950,000
3$3,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. Donskoi, Joonas
  2. 2022 4th round pick (WSH)
2.
VAN
  1. 2022 7th round pick (DAL)
BUF
  1. Highmore, Matthew [RFA Rights]
3.
4.
VAN
  1. Brossoit, Laurent
  2. Roy, Nicolas [RFA Rights]
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (VGK)
  4. 2023 3rd round pick (BUF)
VGK
  1. Ferland, Micheal
  2. Höglander, Nils
  3. 2022 4th round pick (WSH)
5.
6.
VAN
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the DAL
2023
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$75,618,750$1,250,000$2,550,000$6,881,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$2,950,000$2,950,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Seattle Kraken
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$850,000$850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,260,000$7,260,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$883,750$883,750 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 26, 2022 at 4:19 p.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Pearson isn't a cap dump, Donskoi is. That is selling way too low on Pearson

Highmore isn't being traded

Not sure Philly does that deal, but I'd be cool with it if they accepted

Don't mind the Vegas trade

Not sure the Devils do that, value is pretty close I'd say

Bruins trade looks fair, but I still wouldn't deal away Garland like that
majormoose007 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 4:24 p.m.
#2
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 5,920
Likes: 2,574
Devils could just trade Zacha for Vanecek and not deal with the Myers contract
Levig01 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 4:27 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 2,213
Likes: 967
Every time a Canucks fan suggests Philly trade 5OA for Miller, Gritty clips an angels wings with garden shears.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 4:28 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 1,276
That's an easy no from the Devils even if Zacha was removed from it. I'm glad that Myers had a better season for you guys last year, he'd still be a 6m, 3rd pairing Dman in NJ. Brossoit isn't a capable backup even if he was cheaper. And DiPietro would be lucky to play in Utica next year, as it's unlikely he beats out Daws and Schmid. This is all just bad cap and a prospect that the Devils don't need.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 4:55 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 449
Likes: 208
Really good idea with the Pearson/Donskoi swap. That's exactly the type of trade Vancouver should be looking for imo - get rid of Pearson, Dickinson, and Poolman by looking for guys on worse AAV but 1 year term remaining.
Boldirev liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:05 p.m.
#6
MajorMoose
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 2,602
Highmore is worth more than a 7th
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:14 p.m.
#7
Pain
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 224
Likes: 78
Quoting: hairyberry
Really good idea with the Pearson/Donskoi swap. That's exactly the type of trade Vancouver should be looking for imo - get rid of Pearson, Dickinson, and Poolman by looking for guys on worse AAV but 1 year term remaining.


Lol. That trade is beyond awful for Vancouver. Pearson has value and he’s on a fair contract, Donskoi is not
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:14 p.m.
#8
VGKNation702
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,050
Likes: 1,617
easy no from vegas. Were giving up the more productive player and a 2nd and 3rd. I can see us giving the third for Brossoit but this is entirely too homer
Knights20 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:25 p.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: VGKNation702
easy no from vegas. Were giving up the more productive player and a 2nd and 3rd. I can see us giving the third for Brossoit but this is entirely too homer


WTF? Hoglander has more upside than Roy
Boldirev liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:26 p.m.
#10
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Pain
Lol. That trade is beyond awful for Vancouver. Pearson has value and he’s on a fair contract, Donskoi is not


Indeed
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:28 p.m.
#11
VGKNation702
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,050
Likes: 1,617
Quoting: Knuckl3s
WTF? Hoglander has more upside than Roy


Did I say upside? Upside is great until it isn’t realized.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:29 p.m.
#12
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: VGKNation702
Did I say upside? Upside is great until it isn’t realized.


So with that logic, Roy is more valuable than Quinton Byfield
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:57 p.m.
#13
VGKNation702
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,050
Likes: 1,617
Quoting: Knuckl3s
So with that logic, Roy is more valuable than Quinton Byfield

Byfield hasn’t played over 100 nhl games and a top 3 pick lol. Great comparison
Jun. 26, 2022 at 5:59 p.m.
#14
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: VGKNation702
Byfield hasn’t played over 100 nhl games and a top 3 pick lol. Great comparison


Still doesn't excuse your logic about not meriting any value for untapped potential and upside
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:15 p.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 605
Likes: 200
Quoting: VGKNation702
easy no from vegas. Were giving up the more productive player and a 2nd and 3rd. I can see us giving the third for Brossoit but this is entirely too homer


You're giving up a guy you probably can't afford to sign and a cap dump with picks for a young cost controlled prospect that can play plus a LTIR contract to play your cap games with. Pretty fair IMO.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:22 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 605
Likes: 200
Quoting: majormoose007
Highmore is worth more than a 7th


I'm not so sure about that.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:24 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 605
Likes: 200
Quoting: Pain
Lol. That trade is beyond awful for Vancouver. Pearson has value and he’s on a fair contract, Donskoi is not


Donskoi had a very bad year, but has been very useful before. The goal here is eliminating the term and acquiring an asset. If Donskoi rebounds that is another asset at the TDL.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:29 p.m.
#18
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Boldirev
Donskoi had a very bad year, but has been very useful before. The goal here is eliminating the term and acquiring an asset. If Donskoi rebounds that is another asset at the TDL.


Nah, don't move Pearson just for the sake of eliminating the term left on his deal, he's more valuable than that
majormoose007 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:29 p.m.
#19
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Boldirev
I'm not so sure about that.


To the Canucks, Highmore is worth more than a 7th. More like a 4th/5th
majormoose007 liked this.
Jun. 26, 2022 at 7:33 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 605
Likes: 200
Quoting: MellowK
That's an easy no from the Devils even if Zacha was removed from it. I'm glad that Myers had a better season for you guys last year, he'd still be a 6m, 3rd pairing Dman in NJ. Brossoit isn't a capable backup even if he was cheaper. And DiPietro would be lucky to play in Utica next year, as it's unlikely he beats out Daws and Schmid. This is all just bad cap and a prospect that the Devils don't need.


Probably. I DID indicate these were "outlier" trade proposals. Myers would actually fit well on the Devils IMO for many reasons. Dipietro is much better than you are suggesting and Brossoit is probably better than Blackwood. Blackwood was horrendous last year, looks like he is regressing significantly. Daws is pretty good and the competition won't hurt him, but Schmid is nothing special.
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 9:16 a.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 78
Likes: 18
Quoting: Knuckl3s
WTF? Hoglander has more upside than Roy

That is true but Vegas is still giving up way too much. Remove the 2nd and Vegas considers.
Brossoit >/= Ferland
Roy + 3rd >/= Hoglander
2nd >>> 4th
Jun. 27, 2022 at 3:52 p.m.
#22
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Knights20
That is true but Vegas is still giving up way too much. Remove the 2nd and Vegas considers.
Brossoit >/= Ferland
Roy + 3rd >/= Hoglander
2nd >>> 4th


Broissoit < Ferland

There you go
Jun. 28, 2022 at 12:27 a.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 78
Likes: 18
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Broissoit < Ferland

There you go

Meh. You can keep your 4th but we still keep our 2nd.
Jun. 28, 2022 at 1:54 a.m.
#24
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Knights20
Meh. You can keep your 4th but we still keep our 2nd.


Fine by me
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll