SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kane is Kawhi

Created by: Stavros99
Team: 2022-23 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 26, 2022
Published: Jun. 27, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,650,000
2$762,500
2$1,400,000
2$1,350,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
1$800,000
2$3,145,000
3$1,125,000
1$950,000
1$1,500,000
Trades
1.
TOR
  1. DiPietro, Michael [RFA Rights]
  2. Garland, Conor
  3. 2022 1st round pick (VAN)
  4. 2023 4th round pick (NYR)
2.
TOR
  1. 2022 4th round pick (CGY)
3.
TOR
  1. 2022 5th round pick (CBJ)
4.
TOR
  1. Kane, Patrick ($5,250,000 retained)
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (TOR)
CHI
  1. Miettinen, Veeti [Reserve List]
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. Rubins, Kristians [RFA Rights]
  4. 2022 1st round pick (TOR)
  5. 2022 3rd round pick (WPG)
  6. 2022 4th round pick (CGY)
  7. 2023 4th round pick (NYR)
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the TOR
2023
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2024
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$74,425,750$212,500$0$8,074,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
-$2,625,000-$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$950,000$950,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
LW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$7,500,000$7,500,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 2
$3,145,000$3,145,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 2
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RD
UFA - 2
$1,125,000$1,125,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
UFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, RW
RFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:10 p.m.
#51
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 3,578
Quoting: GMBL
It's known that the Tavares-Nylander line wasn't great last year 5v5 they were pretty much even for a good stretch. That's going to factor into those stats. If you look at the Gaudreau-Lindholm-Tkachuk lines metrics they probably have some incredible stats last year since there were so amazing on 5v5.

If you are going to compare players though, you can't look at a single year.


Sure. But at the end of the day garland was better last year 5v5 than nylander. Maybe nylander is better next year maybe garland is better again.

Not worth the Canucks adding a 1st and $2 million in cap hit plus losing two years of control for a player who was outperformed this past season at the area Canucks need the most help
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:15 p.m.
#52
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: mv21227
Garland has averaged more P/60 at 5v5 than Kerfoot every season he’s been in the league, despite playing with worse linemates. Garland has great advanced stats metrics. Garland just finished 28th in the league in 5v5 P/60. Stop being a blind homer for once


Keep him then
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:15 p.m.
#53
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,566
Likes: 3,319
Quoting: Demkod
He is right though, and also Garland and Nylander both have the same amount of 5v5 points, only difference is Nylander played pp and Garland didn't. So its not that much of a upgrade considering Garland is cheaper, on a longer contract.


It's obvious that Nylander is elite talent and Garland isn't but at the end of the day you can look at analytics all you want or potential, never really know if someone is going to be an upgrade until you see how they fit in a team's system vs the old guy.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:16 p.m.
#54
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: The_Rocket
Sure. But at the end of the day garland was better last year 5v5 than nylander. Maybe nylander is better next year maybe garland is better again.

Not worth the Canucks adding a 1st and $2 million in cap hit plus losing two years of control for a player who was outperformed this past season at the area Canucks need the most help


Then keep him. Also where is Kerfoot in the 5v5 points per 60? Answer that and then tell me why Garland is better than Kerfoot?
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:18 p.m.
#55
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,566
Likes: 3,319
Quoting: The_Rocket
Sure. But at the end of the day garland was better last year 5v5 than nylander. Maybe nylander is better next year maybe garland is better again.

Not worth the Canucks adding a 1st and $2 million in cap hit plus losing two years of control for a player who was outperformed this past season at the area Canucks need the most help


The move makes no sense for either guy, the only reason he's moving Nylander is his cap hit is needed to bring in Kane and maybe to get a little "tougher", changing a core piece for a rental that is going to cost you a boatload of assets and almost has a 100% chance of walking (if he even considers leaving in the first place for Tor) to play with another new guy to the team is a recipe for chemistry failure.
The_Rocket liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:20 p.m.
#56
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 3,578
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Then keep him. Also where is Kerfoot in the 5v5 points per 60? Answer that and then tell me why Garland is better than Kerfoot?


Sure.

Last year:

Kerfoot 2.45
Nylander 2.13

Garland 2.62

Last three years combined:

Kerfoot 2.04
Nylander 2.23

Garland 2.38

We good now? Garland out paced both last year and outpaced both over the last 3 years
mv21227, Juiceman and Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:22 p.m.
#57
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 3,578
Quoting: GMBL
The move makes no sense for either guy, the only reason he's moving Nylander is his cap hit is needed to bring in Kane and maybe to get a little "tougher", changing a core piece for a rental that is going to cost you a boatload of assets and almost has a 100% chance of walking (if he even considers leaving in the first place for Tor) to play with another new guy to the team is a recipe for chemistry failure.


Yeah agreed actually. Leafs shaking up their core is the wrong move imo. Change for the sake of change is a great way to kill a franchise, plus Nylnder is a super important piece to their PP.

Garland scores better 5v5 but Nylnder fits the leafs better
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:25 p.m.
#58
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: The_Rocket
Sure.

Last year:

Kerfoot 2.45
Nylander 2.13

Garland 2.62

Last three years combined:

Kerfoot 2.04
Nylander 2.23

Garland 2.38

We good now? Garland out paced both last year and outpaced both over the last 3 years


So long as I don't have to have this stupid conversation ever again I'll be good.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:28 p.m.
#59
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 8,566
Likes: 3,319
Quoting: The_Rocket
Yeah agreed actually. Leafs shaking up their core is the wrong move imo. Change for the sake of change is a great way to kill a franchise, plus Nylnder is a super important piece to their PP.

Garland scores better 5v5 but Nylnder fits the leafs better


You never know who is going to crack under the pressure in Toronto, the expectations are high and there's a ton of media coverage.

Might just be me but when I see the Leafs PP, I feel like he's under utilized, almost as if he's not allowed to shoot unless he has an open shot or they are looking for a tip in.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 12:40 p.m.
#60
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 3,578
Quoting: GMBL
You never know who is going to crack under the pressure in Toronto, the expectations are high and there's a ton of media coverage.

Might just be me but when I see the Leafs PP, I feel like he's under utilized, almost as if he's not allowed to shoot unless he has an open shot or they are looking for a tip in.


I think Nylnder does a great job of getting into the soft areas on the PP and finding Tavares in the bumper.

That said, sometimes it feels like the goal of the leafs pp is to get the puck to Matthews, rather than to score.
GMBL and Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 1:54 p.m.
#61
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 17,615
Likes: 17,624
I still don’t understand how these Leafs fans get triggered so easily. Vancouver doesn’t need to upgrade on wing. Not really hard to comprehend lmao
The_Rocket and Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:21 p.m.
#62
AM34 Biggest fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 200
Likes: 35
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Why? Because we don't wilt to the trolls and treat all our players like they are AHLers?


No because you sit here with your fingers in your ears and go lalala everytime someone says a leafs player isn't as good as a player or the that in a team that greatly benefits the leafs you still argue and say the other team should get more, I think we have good players but they haven't proven **** in this league
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:25 p.m.
#63
AM34 Biggest fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 200
Likes: 35
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
/looks at the proposal that literally no one likes and you made
lol, sure thing, tiger


Atleast I don't overvalue leafs players like crazy
Jun. 27, 2022 at 2:29 p.m.
#64
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Mathewsisbetterthenmcdavid
No because you sit here with your fingers in your ears and go lalala everytime someone says a leafs player isn't as good as a player or the that in a team that greatly benefits the leafs you still argue and say the other team should get more, I think we have good players but they haven't proven **** in this league


Not at all true. I chirp back when people talk like Nylander is a 3rd liner, or Kerfoot sucks or Holl sucks or Muzzin is done. Most players in this league haven't proven ****. Yet somehow they are immune to abuse lobbed around on here. McDavid gets not abuse and what has he won apart from some individual awards. A couple rounds? Who cares. Matthews won a bunch of individual awards this year, but what does that matter unless you win the cup.

What's my point here? According to most on here, everyone on the Leafs is either declining massively, an AHL player or a cap dump. Sometimes all 3. I just don't get swayed but that crap or back down from it. JT isn't showing huge decline, neither is Muzzin. Rielly isn't the worst defenceman in the league defensively. Nylander isn't a soft floater who never goes to the net. Kerfoot isn't an AHL player. Holl is a very valuable depth defenceman on a good contract. But when I say that, the haters shout Homer and lob insults. Then some "Leaf fan" call us stupid because we don't just wilt to that bull****.
Jun. 27, 2022 at 3:17 p.m.
#65
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,709
Likes: 7,377
Quoting: Mathewsisbetterthenmcdavid
Atleast I don't overvalue leafs players like crazy


Nice user name champ
Jun. 27, 2022 at 4:25 p.m.
#66
AM34 Biggest fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 200
Likes: 35
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Not at all true. I chirp back when people talk like Nylander is a 3rd liner, or Kerfoot sucks or Holl sucks or Muzzin is done. Most players in this league haven't proven ****. Yet somehow they are immune to abuse lobbed around on here. McDavid gets not abuse and what has he won apart from some individual awards. A couple rounds? Who cares. Matthews won a bunch of individual awards this year, but what does that matter unless you win the cup.

What's my point here? According to most on here, everyone on the Leafs is either declining massively, an AHL player or a cap dump. Sometimes all 3. I just don't get swayed but that crap or back down from it. JT isn't showing huge decline, neither is Muzzin. Rielly isn't the worst defenceman in the league defensively. Nylander isn't a soft floater who never goes to the net. Kerfoot isn't an AHL player. Holl is a very valuable depth defenceman on a good contract. But when I say that, the haters shout Homer and lob insults. Then some "Leaf fan" call us stupid because we don't just wilt to that bull****.


Literally no one here has said Nylander is a 3rd liner, saying Kerfoot a 3rd liner as well isn't disrespectful he really should be it's our LW depth that has him on the 2nd line, Holl is ass like complete under trash so most are right, Muzzin may only have a like a year left in him
Jun. 27, 2022 at 4:26 p.m.
#67
AM34 Biggest fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 200
Likes: 35
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Nice user name champ


Thanks, 60 goals is pretty incredible in this league
Jun. 27, 2022 at 4:44 p.m.
#68
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 19,709
Likes: 7,377
Quoting: Mathewsisbetterthenmcdavid
Thanks, 60 goals is pretty incredible in this league


I think pots commenting on the shades of kettles is pretty amusing
Jun. 27, 2022 at 4:51 p.m.
#69
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Mathewsisbetterthenmcdavid
Literally no one here has said Nylander is a 3rd liner, saying Kerfoot a 3rd liner as well isn't disrespectful he really should be it's our LW depth that has him on the 2nd line, Holl is ass like complete under trash so most are right, Muzzin may only have a like a year left in him


So you are just one of those "listen to troll nation" fans. See ya
Jun. 27, 2022 at 7:49 p.m.
#70
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Garland isn't even better than Kerfoot at 5v5. Lol


Yeah he is
Jun. 27, 2022 at 7:50 p.m.
#71
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
right? someone here said garland was better than nylander at 5v5!


Kerfoot, not Nylander
Jun. 27, 2022 at 7:50 p.m.
#72
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Keep Garland


We will in that case
Jun. 27, 2022 at 7:56 p.m.
#73
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2021
Posts: 12,418
Likes: 2,630
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Good then let's just not talk about his anymore. Garland is a Vancouver problem. Benning signed a depth forward for 1.5 more than he should have. Now enjoy losing Boeser and Miller because your former GM wanted to spend big on plugs like OEL and Myers.


Garland isn't overpaid, and OEL and Myers aren't plugs. Homer confirmed!
Jun. 27, 2022 at 8:04 p.m.
#74
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,939
Likes: 3,578
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Kerfoot, not Nylander


Nylander is the better total player. However, garland is a better 5v5 play driver
Knuckl3s liked this.
Jun. 28, 2022 at 12:00 a.m.
#75
Owly
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,559
Likes: 932
Quoting: Leafs3416
I like this assessment. I think if the leaf's can add a 2LW and maybe some depth wingers that can chip in or even just be that hardnose shot blocking/pain in the a$$ to play against type player they will be very hard to beat. Jared Bednar was literally quoted before the SCF series started saying he watched game tapes of the TB v TOR series based on the similarities between COL and TOR. Above all in my opinion the biggest step the leaf's need to make is that defensive, fight, play thru the pain buy in that teams like Colorado had this year.

Oh also...Vancouver fans suck. Go Leaf's Go.


I think they will add a couple more low risk, high reward signings that could turn into really good depth pieces. I would like a little more sand paper but it has to be someone who can play. Kill penalties, or score a bit more. Another Kampf with a bit more finish would be good.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll