SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2nd round picks

Created by: WangoTangoBardo
Team: 2022-23 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 6, 2022
Published: Jul. 6, 2022
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
taking on bad contracts for 2nd round picks is what capitalism is all about
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,050,000
1$1,050,000
1$925,000
1$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$800,000
Trades
1.
BUF
  1. Foligno, Nick
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (BOS)
BOS
2.
BUF
  1. Jost, Tyson
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (VAN)
MIN
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey
  2. 2022 3rd round pick (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. Ferland, Micheal
  2. 2023 2nd round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Olofsson, Victor [RFA Rights]
4.
BUF
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. 2022 2nd round pick (CAR)
CAR
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2022
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the DAL
2023
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$63,932,501$0$2,687,500$18,567,499
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$825,000$825,000
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$412,500$412K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,800,000$3,800,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$800,000$800,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,200,000$2,200,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,050,000$4,050,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,916,667$4,916,667
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jul. 6, 2022 at 11:51 p.m.
#1
BigMeech
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 350
canucks decline
The_Rocket liked this.
Jul. 6, 2022 at 11:52 p.m.
#2
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2019
Posts: 6,960
Likes: 3,581
Canucks have a lot of wingers and not very many 2nd round picks. Think we’ll sit this one out
audiodave and Knuckl3s liked this.
Jul. 6, 2022 at 11:52 p.m.
#3
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Canes just give up gards and a 2023 third to AZ, they undercut the sabres every day of the week. Also if you are acquiring gards and playing him on the first line shouldn’t the sabres be paying, not a second, but maybe a 6th or 7th
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:00 a.m.
#4
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,255
Likes: 9,043
Yikes. That Canucks trade is atrocious for Buffalo, this roster is terrible. They aren't taking other teams cap dumps, all of those cap dumps won't make the roster (let alone be on the Sabres top pair with Dahlin)
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:01 a.m.
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,255
Likes: 9,043
Quoting: Hurricanes73
Canes just give up gards and a 2023 third to AZ, they undercut the sabres every day of the week. Also if you are acquiring gards and playing him on the first line shouldn’t the sabres be paying, not a second, but maybe a 6th or 7th


Gardiner is maybe a 7th dman in Buffalo and that's a hard maybe
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:10 a.m.
#6
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Quoting: Shibbal18
Gardiner is maybe a 7th dman in Buffalo and that's a hard maybe


The only reason I am saying he is a top line d man is that the creator of this post lined him up there. I think gards is a solid 5d on buffalo behind power, dahlia, jokiharju, and maybe and that’s a big maybe in Bryson. To suggest he is a 7 d is like to suggest he is a first line d. Gards is a bottom 4 d man in the league imo, bottom pair on a good team, middle pair on a bad team.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:20 a.m.
#7
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,255
Likes: 9,043
Edited Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:44 a.m.
Quoting: Hurricanes73
The only reason I am saying he is a top line d man is that the creator of this post lined him up there. I think gards is a solid 5d on buffalo behind power, dahlia, jokiharju, and maybe and that’s a big maybe in Bryson. To suggest he is a 7 d is like to suggest he is a first line d. Gards is a bottom 4 d man in the league imo, bottom pair on a good team, middle pair on a bad team.


I know why you asked the question, but gardiner wouldnt be in the Sabres top 6 without injury
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:20 a.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 66
Likes: 7
Quoting: Hurricanes73
The only reason I am saying he is a top line d man is that the creator of this post lined him up there. I think gards is a solid 5d on buffalo behind power, dahlia, jokiharju, and maybe and that’s a big maybe in Bryson. To suggest he is a 7 d is like to suggest he is a first line d. Gards is a bottom 4 d man in the league imo, bottom pair on a good team, middle pair on a bad team.


i gotta put someone in the top spot
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:24 a.m.
#9
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Quoting: WangoTangoBardo
i gotta put someone in the top spot


Power is a much better option
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:26 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 66
Likes: 7
Quoting: Hurricanes73
Power is a much better option


they play power with jokiharju on the 2nd pair, dahlin plays with a mishmash of d partners
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:35 a.m.
#11
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Quoting: Shibbal18
I know why hou asked the question, but gardiner wouldnt be in the Sabres top 6 without injury


Do you really believe that? The three i see who are better than him without doubt is power dahlin and jokiharju. Before gards injury he had a higher point avg than Bryson, Samuelson, and Fitzgerald who are all on this team. The UFAs the sabres have are pysyk, miller, and butcher. Gards had a higher projected point total than pysyk and butcher. I know points aren’t everything but gards had evolved into a solid defensive player as well. Gards is a top 4 d man on the sabres if they don’t resign miller and is a 5d if they do.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:36 a.m.
#12
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Quoting: WangoTangoBardo
they play power with jokiharju on the 2nd pair, dahlin plays with a mishmash of d partners


I mean if u see what I just posted, if the sabres don’t resign miller gards is the best option to be that man up there
WangoTangoBardo liked this.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:44 a.m.
#13
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,255
Likes: 9,043
Quoting: Hurricanes73
Do you really believe that? The three i see who are better than him without doubt is power dahlin and jokiharju. Before gards injury he had a higher point avg than Bryson, Samuelson, and Fitzgerald who are all on this team. The UFAs the sabres have are pysyk, miller, and butcher. Gards had a higher projected point total than pysyk and butcher. I know points aren’t everything but gards had evolved into a solid defensive player as well. Gards is a top 4 d man on the sabres if they don’t resign miller and is a 5d if they do.


Quoting: Hurricanes73
I mean if u see what I just posted, if the sabres don’t resign miller gards is the best option to be that man up there


??? Samuelsson Dahlin was their best pair last year, and universally it's expected they start the year together. The Sabres aren't resigning Miller or Butcher for the same reason Gardiner isn't in their top 6, they don't need them. They're looking for a solid vet RD partner for Power. Bryson, Samuelsson, and Fitzgerald are not offensive dmen, and are not expected to put up a ton of points. Jokiharju and Power are automatically getting priority over Gardiner, and Bryson, Fitzgerald and possibly Pysyk have been fine for the bottom pair.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:51 a.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 66
Likes: 7
Quoting: Shibbal18
??? Samuelsson Dahlin was their best pair last year, and universally it's expected they start the year together. The Sabres aren't resigning Miller or Butcher for the same reason Gardiner isn't in their top 6, they don't need them. They're looking for a solid vet RD partner for Power. Bryson, Samuelsson, and Fitzgerald are not offensive dmen, and are not expected to put up a ton of points. Jokiharju and Power are automatically getting priority over Gardiner, and Bryson, Fitzgerald and possibly Pysyk have been fine for the bottom pair.


i agree but you cant expect everyone to be healthy, and buffalo needs to spend money to get to the cap floor, and if you give a guy like gardiner a chance and he performs you could flip him at the deadline
Jul. 7, 2022 at 12:52 a.m.
#15
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Quoting: Shibbal18
??? Samuelsson Dahlin was their best pair last year, and universally it's expected they start the year together. The Sabres aren't resigning Miller or Butcher for the same reason Gardiner isn't in their top 6, they don't need them. They're looking for a solid vet RD partner for Power. Bryson, Samuelsson, and Fitzgerald are not offensive dmen, and are not expected to put up a ton of points. Jokiharju and Power are automatically getting priority over Gardiner, and Bryson, Fitzgerald and possibly Pysyk have been fine for the bottom pair.


I follow the league pretty well I’d say. I have never heard of Samuelson before today. Ur the sabres fan so I’ll take your word on it. Looking into it rn Samuelson seems ok, not who u want as a top pair d man but ok overall. Tbh I’d rather have gards on that d core than Fitzgerald but that’s just me. I would imagine the reasons I don’t know Samuelson is because he is a defensive d man, doesn’t have insane advanced analytics, and plays for buffalo. That’s why I treated him as a bottom pair d man as opposed to a top pair like u said.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 1:02 a.m.
#16
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,255
Likes: 9,043
Quoting: WangoTangoBardo
i agree but you cant expect everyone to be healthy, and buffalo needs to spend money to get to the cap floor, and if you give a guy like gardiner a chance and he performs you could flip him at the deadline


They'll be able to get to the cap floor by filling out their roster, and the GM said many times he's not trading for players that will block their youth
Jul. 7, 2022 at 1:07 a.m.
#17
Shibbal18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 25,255
Likes: 9,043
Quoting: Hurricanes73
I follow the league pretty well I’d say. I have never heard of Samuelson before today. Ur the sabres fan so I’ll take your word on it. Looking into it rn Samuelson seems ok, not who u want as a top pair d man but ok overall. Tbh I’d rather have gards on that d core than Fitzgerald but that’s just me. I would imagine the reasons I don’t know Samuelson is because he is a defensive d man, doesn’t have insane advanced analytics, and plays for buffalo. That’s why I treated him as a bottom pair d man as opposed to a top pair like u said.


Fitzgerald is their 8th dman. Samuelsson was also a rookie, who played half the season. Advanced stats with no context and not watching the player means pretty much nothing, especially when it's just lumping his entire half season into one number, when he came up as a sheltered rookie and won a spot on the top pair with his play further into the season. Completely different situations from when he came up to where he ended
Jul. 7, 2022 at 1:30 a.m.
#18
Glep
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 911
Quoting: Shibbal18
Fitzgerald is their 8th dman. Samuelsson was also a rookie, who played half the season. Advanced stats with no context and not watching the player means pretty much nothing, especially when it's just lumping his entire half season into one number, when he came up as a sheltered rookie and won a spot on the top pair with his play further into the season. Completely different situations from when he came up to where he ended


We will see how this season goes and if Samuelson makes a name for himself. His advanced stats r ok but it’s probably based on his situation. End of the day, I still believe gards is a solid 5d on the sabres and we will agree to disagree on his value to the sabres organization. You know the players, I know the guy coming in. We shall see what happens
Jul. 7, 2022 at 3:46 a.m.
#19
Minnesota Wild
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 994
Likes: 335
I see zero upside in this deal for Minnesota. We have $4 million in cap room to sign a backup goalie, a depth forward, and leave room for injuries. Making this trade doesn't fill either of those holes, but it cuts out $500k for us to work with and it drops us back almost a full round. Add on to that the fact that Mittelstadt hasn't played close to a full season in 3 years and we now we definitely need the extra forward to compensate for his injuries. From our perspective, we're taking on the worse contract and paying for the right to do so which makes this an easy pass.
Jul. 7, 2022 at 8:54 a.m.
#20
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 479
Quoting: futurehofer
I see zero upside in this deal for Minnesota. We have $4 million in cap room to sign a backup goalie, a depth forward, and leave room for injuries. Making this trade doesn't fill either of those holes, but it cuts out $500k for us to work with and it drops us back almost a full round. Add on to that the fact that Mittelstadt hasn't played close to a full season in 3 years and we now we definitely need the extra forward to compensate for his injuries. From our perspective, we're taking on the worse contract and paying for the right to do so which makes this an easy pass.


I wouldn’t say zero upside. I’d say Casey is a better player than Jost is. He still has the potential to be a top 6C. I’d accept this deal if I was BG. His injuries have held him back, but he’s young enough where as he understands the game better that could change. This feels like a minimal ask for a potential top 6 C.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll