Vancouver declines. We're not giving up picks for rentals and don't have the cap space to do that either.

Keep your crap dumps .

Ottawa declines.

Could be any team tbf just put Vancouver because I think they need 1 or 2 more depth pieces and I'm not really familiar with their cap situation

You’d think if either a.leafs wanted to move kerfoot or b.anyone wanted him it would’ve happened by now

we don't need more wingers

Canucks also dumped Ferland in the deal. Helps TOR become cap compliant. Canucks add a draft pick in a deep draft, get a decent 3rd line C and a young RHD. Doubt were getting abetter return than this but if you want to live in a delusional fairy tale land, be my guest.

Only included him to keep Toronto under the cap. He's a UFA anyways so low risk.

Maybe you haven't heard of Bo Horvat? He is a pretty decent 2 C . Ferland does not need to be moved he is not coming back . I don't know how many times I have to say this on here Canucks DO NOT CARE ABOUT TORONTO"S CAP ISSUE. This has absolutely no chance of coming true .

How does Toronto's poor cap management become Canucks problem?

you're not getting a 2nd rounder for Holl, even if the 3rd comes back. Leafs will be lucky to get a 4th for him

Philly declines

Nucks don't want kerfoot. Ottawa doesn't want Holl. Flyers would probably rather keep Frost but idk. Holl is a 3rd/7th defensemen and kerfoot isn't really centre material, more of a winger, and the league is chalk full of wingers. Both of those guys are cap dumps for the leafs anyways so the return will be very small. For reference, Bjorkstrand just got a 3rd and 4th after putting up 28 goals, which means a third is kerfoot absolute max return at the moment.

? is do the leafs put Kerfoot or Muzzin on waivers. They might to get under the cap. Dubas waited way too long to make any kind of a move. He even gave Kerfoot and Holl, M-NTC contracts, which was plan stupidity.