thats a ton.

Arizona has no room or interest in foegele unless they’re getting multiple 2nds, just like nemeth

State your source

Ben Chariot went for a first, fourth and prospect and is a significantly worse player than Severson and I don't see Barrie adding a ton of value in this case since NJ probably doesn't want his final year on the books. But I would gladly keep the first just don't think it's realistic

Me, looking at their already full forward depth chart, while listening to bill Armstrong say and Craig Morgan report that they want to bring some of the prospects up this year. Foegele gets a 4th line roll in Arizona, they can fill that with organizational depth that needs nhl reps. If the oilers want to overpay like they did with kassian, then sure, but otherwise no, there’s no need for foegele

State your source that they are interested.

I wouldn't trade back a 4th. The difference in picks may be 8-10 spots.

that ben chariot trade was god awful and everyone knows it. Just look at bill Zito's trades, he's given up a ton for nothing. this would be fine if puljuj wasn't in it, that's why I'm saying its a ton.

I don’t think Barrie would be much of a need for New Jersey. And we haven’t normally taken cap dumps (last one was 2016 and we have had some rotten teams with a lot of cap space since).

If it were a trade before the season, Puljujarvi would seem to fit more. But I’d guess at deadline, Severson would be moved in more futures-oriented trade.

I don't know they are interested. I am merely putting together hypothetical rosters based on my opinion. I do not pretend to know a single thing that any NHL team's management actually would or wouldn't do.

Fair enough but that causes a bit of an issue cap-wise swapping Pool in for Phil where suddenly Benson or Shore need to be regulars instead of adding a Milano/ ZAR. So you could think of it as Severson, Kessel and Milano for that deal as the 3 mill from Pool gets used to sign those two. In this hypothetical situation at least.