SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tearing it down

Created by: DirtyDangles
Team: 2023-24 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 14, 2023
Published: Mar. 14, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Take Michkov with the Flyers 1st and 1 of Barlow, Yager or top D man available.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
2$2,000,000
3$3,250,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
2$900,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. 2023 1st round pick (LAK)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Hayes, Kevin ($2,642,857 retained)
2.
PHI
  1. 2023 3rd round pick (ANA)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
Any Team
ANA
  1. Deangelo, Anthony ($2,500,000 retained)
3.
PHI
  1. 2023 1st round pick (CAR)
  2. 2024 1st round pick (CAR)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (PHI)
4.
PHI
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. 2023 1st round pick (DET)
  3. 2024 1st round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the DET
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PHI
2024
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
2025
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the PHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$72,196,024$1,187,500$495,000$11,303,976
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$7,750,000$7,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$863,333$863,333
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$37,500$38K)
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$785,000$785,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$762,500$762,500
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$3,979,000$3,979,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$5,100,000$5,100,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$859,167$859,167 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$900,000$900,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$900,000$900,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$900,000$900,000
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$1,750,000$1,750,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 14, 2023 at 8:49 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 2,390
Detroit declines. One more year of double the price Provorov and a fringe NHL back up doesn’t get you a top 15 pick +
aedoran liked this.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 8:50 a.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: CoachCoach
Detroit declines. One more year of double the price Provorov and a fringe NHL back up doesn’t get you a top 15 pick +


The thought would be to re-sign Provorov
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:07 a.m.
#3
Pro
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 352
Likes: 89
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The thought would be to re-sign Provorov


Still too expensive
aedoran liked this.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:13 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 2,390
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The thought would be to re-sign Provorov


LD is the last position that Detroit is worried about. Chiarot while not the greatest is still around for 3 more years. Maata and Walman extended, and there are several prospects near NHL ready including Edvinsson. Detroit needs a 2C and RHD.
Billy316 and aedoran liked this.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:19 a.m.
#5
RetireFedorov
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2017
Posts: 976
Likes: 745
Wings pass, you traded the 1 area to them that's not a need
aedoran liked this.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:20 a.m.
#6
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 749
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The thought would be to re-sign Provorov


Your Target is LAK
They got a Provorov size hole on LD
That said PHI would have to RS of atleast 2m x 2 years to get them in the mix

He's still young but he's overpaid
I mean Petry's better and makes less but we had to trade him at a loss taking on term as no one else would offer picks or prospects.
Lucky for us Matheson has thrived here but similar to the Tatar trade he wasnt included because of that logic but because he wasnt earning his contract on his old team.


When he was 22-23 with those numbers people expected he'd hit another level so they were willing to pay
But at 26 its becoming clear he's not a #1 Defensman but more of a 2nd pair 3rd or 4th D being paid as a top guy.

My point is for LAK to get Value RS is a must .
The more you retain the higher the value.
Provorov at 50% RS brings everyone in the fold even cash strapped teams and teams looking to skate players then flip them like ANA did with Klingberg.



That said i think its more like

Provorov at 50% RS to LAK

For
Jordan Spence
Akil Thomas
Conditional 2nd that becomes a 1st if LAK makes WCF with Provorov playing half in 2022-23
Conditional 2nd that becomes a 1st if LAK makes WCF with Provorov playing half in 2023-24

Top RD Prospect outside Brandt Clarke who is not available.
Thomas who needs a system change and his speed based style is more appreciated in the East
Likely atleast 1/2 picks in the 2nd round turning into a 1st if not both (late 1st is like upgrading from the back of the line in the 2nd round to the front)
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:24 a.m.
#7
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 749
Quoting: CoachCoach
LD is the last position that Detroit is worried about. Chiarot while not the greatest is still around for 3 more years. Maata and Walman extended, and there are several prospects near NHL ready including Edvinsson. Detroit needs a 2C and RHD.


I miss Chiarot.
I know Jake Allen more then anyone does after last night.
He's not a leader on any pair, but put him beside a Leader on any pair and he'll play up to their level.

If i could make a deal work i would
MTL has a cluster of LD though and while i'd give up Savard or Kovacevic next year after the TDL
That would be for a profit and to clear room.

Only way i see Chiarot coming back is if he learns to play back up goalie lol
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:25 a.m.
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 60,130
Likes: 23,046
"Tearing it down" usually means trading high cap players and only expecting good picks in return. Teams can spend that cap on UFAs, and keep their picks. Yea, I don't see team that would want to give up so much for either so much cap or so little term.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:34 a.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: palhal
"Tearing it down" usually means trading high cap players and only expecting good picks in return. Teams can spend that cap on UFAs, and keep their picks. Yea, I don't see team that would want to give up so much for either so much cap or so little term.


Yes, you are right...teams never trade good picks for good players.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:40 a.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: CoachCoach
LD is the last position that Detroit is worried about. Chiarot while not the greatest is still around for 3 more years. Maata and Walman extended, and there are several prospects near NHL ready including Edvinsson. Detroit needs a 2C and RHD.


So you want to wait another 3-4 years before being a contender? Think Yzerman has had enough of the 10 year rebuild. Chiarot is not a top pairing guy. Also, Provy has played the right side in his career.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 9:58 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,735
Likes: 8,301
Quoting: DirtyDangles
So you want to wait another 3-4 years before being a contender? Think Yzerman has had enough of the 10 year rebuild. Chiarot is not a top pairing guy. Also, Provy has played the right side in his career.


Unfortunately provorov would not make this team a contender. Also it will probably be another 3-4 years until we are contenders and that's the reality of it unless alot of players take massive strides in their play. Chiarot also doesn't play top pair, Walman plays top pair with Seider and from what I've seen they have been a top 5 pairing in the league. Provorov would be an upgrade over Maatta but the cost is drastically too great for the slight upgrade it would be. Not too mention he makes double what Maatta does. Those picks are more likely to have a greater impact on the team in comparison to what the difference of impact from Maatta to provorov would be.
For the rest of the trades, I don't think Columbus wants to move any firsts, they might be in on Hayes after the draft if they don't get one of the top players available but not at the cost of a first round pick.
I doubt Konecny pulls two firsts and a second as well, pretty expensive winger who is only a ppg player in this league now.
aedoran liked this.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 10:10 a.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Lancebmx
Unfortunately provorov would not make this team a contender. Also it will probably be another 3-4 years until we are contenders and that's the reality of it unless alot of players take massive strides in their play. Chiarot also doesn't play top pair, Walman plays top pair with Seider and from what I've seen they have been a top 5 pairing in the league. Provorov would be an upgrade over Maatta but the cost is drastically too great for the slight upgrade it would be. Not too mention he makes double what Maatta does. Those picks are more likely to have a greater impact on the team in comparison to what the difference of impact from Maatta to provorov would be.
For the rest of the trades, I don't think Columbus wants to move any firsts, they might be in on Hayes after the draft if they don't get one of the top players available but not at the cost of a first round pick.
I doubt Konecny pulls two firsts and a second as well, pretty expensive winger who is only a ppg player in this league now.


Did you say "only a ppg" player and $5.5 mil is expensive? Canes 1sts are gonna be late 1sts so ya, I think a ppg player is worth that. Hayes with that kind of retention is definitely worth a later 1st but would take the CBJ 2nd as well since it should be at the top of the round.

As for your Wings assessment, sure you might be right but Provy would be your best LHD. Maatta is not very good and Chiarot is meh. Walman is not as good as you Wings fans like to claim he is. But ya, DET seems to be in a perpetual rebuild with no end in sight.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 10:54 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 2,390
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Did you say "only a ppg" player and $5.5 mil is expensive? Canes 1sts are gonna be late 1sts so ya, I think a ppg player is worth that. Hayes with that kind of retention is definitely worth a later 1st but would take the CBJ 2nd as well since it should be at the top of the round.

As for your Wings assessment, sure you might be right but Provy would be your best LHD. Maatta is not very good and Chiarot is meh. Walman is not as good as you Wings fans like to claim he is. But ya, DET seems to be in a perpetual rebuild with no end in sight.


Walman is the number 1 LD right now and you are correct in saying that he wouldn’t be if the Wings were contenders. He and Seider have been great, and with Edvinsson/AJ/Wallinder/Buium on the way hopefully one of them proves they can be top 4.

Provorov would be the number 1LD, however two mid 1sts is way too expensive when it won’t change the team. Maata has been just fine and is meant to be a 1-2 year stop gap until the kids are ready.

In two to three years the D core will be completely different.
aedoran liked this.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 11:38 a.m.
#14
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 3,607
Not too many players go for multiple 1st and a high 2nd. I like TK, but he’s not Timo Meier
Mar. 14, 2023 at 11:42 a.m.
#15
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
Not too many players go for multiple 1st and a high 2nd. I like TK, but he’s not Timo Meier


Controlled vs rental
Mar. 14, 2023 at 12:05 p.m.
#16
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 3,607
Go ahead and let me know the examples of controlled players who have been traded for 2x1st and a perceived high second.

Thanks for your comment, but it doesn’t really add much to the discussion. Timo Meier is not a rental

Quoting: DirtyDangles
Controlled vs rental
Mar. 14, 2023 at 12:28 p.m.
#17
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 3,607
Yes…I’m quoting myself. I was curious so I looked for myself.

I stopped at 2009, and the only player traded in a deal similar to this was Phil Kessel back in 2009. You could make an argument with conditional picks included that players like Meier, Chychrun, and Seth Jones too…there just isn’t as much precedent for 2x1st and a 2nd rounder for a single player.

Quoting: Caniac555
Go ahead and let me know the examples of controlled players who have been traded for 2x1st and a perceived high second.

Thanks for your comment, but it doesn’t really add much to the discussion. Timo Meier is not a rental


Quoting: DirtyDangles
Controlled vs rental
Mar. 14, 2023 at 1:19 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
Yes…I’m quoting myself. I was curious so I looked for myself.

I stopped at 2009, and the only player traded in a deal similar to this was Phil Kessel back in 2009. You could make an argument with conditional picks included that players like Meier, Chychrun, and Seth Jones too…there just isn’t as much precedent for 2x1st and a 2nd rounder for a single player.


Mattias Ekholm just got traded for a 1st + Reid Schaffer (1st last year) + Barrie that could net a 2nd.
Claude Giroux (expiring contract) got traded for a 1st + Tippett (former early first) + 3rd
Brandon Hagle traded for 2 1sts + 2 NHLers
I won't use the Eichel trade even though I could
Blake Coleman garnered 2 1sts
Taylor Hall (expiring) for 1 st, a former 1st, a 3rd +

That's just back to 2019
Mar. 14, 2023 at 1:25 p.m.
#19
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 3,607
You’ve stretched it a bit. But let’s go with it…let’s use Hagle and Coleman as examples. Using your logic, you’d accept 2023 1st + Ryan Suzuki (former 1st)?

Quoting: DirtyDangles
Mattias Ekholm just got traded for a 1st + Reid Schaffer (1st last year) + Barrie that could net a 2nd.
Claude Giroux (expiring contract) got traded for a 1st + Tippett (former early first) + 3rd
Brandon Hagle traded for 2 1sts + 2 NHLers
I won't use the Eichel trade even though I could
Blake Coleman garnered 2 1sts
Taylor Hall (expiring) for 1 st, a former 1st, a 3rd +

That's just back to 2019
Mar. 14, 2023 at 1:28 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
You’ve stretched it a bit. But let’s go with it…let’s use Hagle and Coleman as examples. Using your logic, you’d accept 2023 1st + Ryan Suzuki (former 1st)?


No because TK is better than both those guys.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 1:28 p.m.
#21
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 3,607
He’s also more expensive (AAV)

Quoting: DirtyDangles
No because TK is better than both those guys.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 1:31 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2016
Posts: 13,508
Likes: 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
He’s also more expensive (AAV)


A ppg player at $5.5 is not expensive. It's actually below market value so "more expensive" isn't relevant.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 1:42 p.m.
#23
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 8,756
Likes: 3,607
It’s relevant when you use comps for two players who the lightning over paid for because they had low AAVs.

You’re twisting words, I said TK was ‘more expensive (AAV)’ not that his was expensive.

You are commenting as if I’ve said I don’t want or like TK, you don’t have to sell me on the player. The comment I made was on the return.

You won’t get 2x1st and a 2nd from the Canes for TK, find a different team.

Quoting: DirtyDangles
A ppg player at $5.5 is not expensive. It's actually below market value so "more expensive" isn't relevant.
Mar. 14, 2023 at 2:00 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 21,816
Likes: 12,109
Quoting: Billy316
I miss Chiarot.
I know Jake Allen more then anyone does after last night.
He's not a leader on any pair, but put him beside a Leader on any pair and he'll play up to their level.

If i could make a deal work i would
MTL has a cluster of LD though and while i'd give up Savard or Kovacevic next year after the TDL
That would be for a profit and to clear room.

Only way i see Chiarot coming back is if he learns to play back up goalie lol


Why does Allen miss Chiarot doesn't he have anyone to blame bad goals on?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll