SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2 years out Fantilli and trades

Created by: DH28Hockey
Team: 2024-25 Philadelphia Flyers
Initial Creation Date: Apr. 20, 2023
Published: Apr. 20, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,500,000
5$3,500,000
1$3,500,000
8$7,500,000
7$4,200,000
6$5,500,000
2$1,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$5,250,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Fantilli, Adam
3$950,000
Trades
1.
PHI
  1. 2023 2nd round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
Roslovic
CBJ
  1. Hayes, Kevin ($3,142,857 retained)
Additional Details:
Previous Year
2.
CGY
  1. Brink, Bobby
  2. Sanheim, Travis
Additional Details:
2023 Offseason before both players have NTC kick in
3.
PHI
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (FLA)
ARI
    Jay O'Brien Compensation
    4.
    PHI
    1. Hague, Nicolas
    2. Lehner, Robin
    3. 2023 1st round pick (VGK)
    VGK
    1. Provorov, Ivan
    Additional Details:
    2023 Offseason
    5.
    PHI
    1. 2024 3rd round pick (DAL)
    DAL
      TDA 2024 TDL
      6.
      PHI
      1. 2025 3rd round pick (CAR)
      CAR
        Roslovic 2024 TDL
        Buyouts
        Retained Salary Transactions
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2023
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the VGK
        Logo of the CBJ
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the FLA
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the EDM
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the OTT
        Logo of the PHI
        2024
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the FLA
        Logo of the FLA
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the DAL
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the LAK
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the PHI
        2025
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the CAR
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the PHI
        Logo of the PHI
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        23$87,500,000$87,146,173$245,000$127,500$353,827
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $950,000$950,000
        LW, C
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $3,500,000$3,500,000
        C
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $5,500,000$5,500,000
        RW, LW
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $3,500,000$3,500,000
        C, LW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $7,750,000$7,750,000
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $5,500,000$5,500,000
        RW, LW
        UFA - 8
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $5,000,000$5,000,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 4
        Fantilli, Adam
        $950,000$950,000
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $863,333$863,333
        RW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $3,000,000$3,000,000
        C, LW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$12,500$12K)
        C, LW
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $5,875,000$5,875,000
        RW, LW
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $4,200,000$4,200,000
        LD/RD
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Calgary Flames
        $6,250,000$6,250,000
        LD/RD
        NTC
        UFA - 7
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $7,500,000$7,500,000
        G
        RFA
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $903,333$903,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
        LD
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $5,100,000$5,100,000
        RD
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $1,500,000$1,500,000
        G
        RFA - 2
        Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
        $2,294,150$2,294,150
        LD
        RFA - 1
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $5,250,000$5,250,000
        RD
        UFA
        ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
        Logo of the Vegas Golden Knights
        $5,000,000$5,000,000
        G
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $6,250,000$6,250,000
        RD
        UFA - 3
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $1,750,000$1,750,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 2
        Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
        $797,500$797,500 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
        C
        RFA - 1

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 10:21 a.m.
        #1
        GO FLAMES GO
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 18,291
        Likes: 10,632
        Calgary has no interest in that
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 10:25 a.m.
        #2
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2019
        Posts: 2,214
        Likes: 968
        Quoting: Gmonwy
        Calgary has no interest in that


        I view Sanheim and Weegar as very, very similar players with similar situations. Main reason I'd see Philly trying something like this is due to complete lack of RHD to a point where I think they'd overpay for him
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 10:29 a.m.
        #3
        GO FLAMES GO
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 18,291
        Likes: 10,632
        Quoting: DH28Hockey
        I view Sanheim and Weegar as very, very similar players with similar situations. Main reason I'd see Philly trying something like this is due to complete lack of RHD to a point where I think they'd overpay for him


        And Weegar was amazing for Calgary. I do not see him being available. Only Dmen I see being traded is Kylington(if he is able to come back for next season) Hanifin and Tanev(and only if they refuse to resign). We have many other players that can be moved for cap, and we have no reason to trade Weegar
        DH28Hockey and soooonk liked this.
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 11:13 a.m.
        #4
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2019
        Posts: 8,145
        Likes: 3,634
        They all seem a bit rich on the return to Philly
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 11:34 a.m.
        #5
        No longer a Virgin
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 6,027
        Likes: 2,607
        no one is giving a second round pick for Jay Obrien
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 12:36 p.m.
        #6
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2019
        Posts: 38,334
        Likes: 19,566
        Quoting: DH28Hockey
        I view Sanheim and Weegar as very, very similar players with similar situations. Main reason I'd see Philly trying something like this is due to complete lack of RHD to a point where I think they'd overpay for him


        Then you view them wrong. Sanheim is nowhere near as good as Weegar. Weegar was once again one of the top defensive defensemen in the league this year
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 12:42 p.m.
        #7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2018
        Posts: 1,882
        Likes: 590
        Quoting: stephane_robidas
        no one is giving a second round pick for Jay Obrien


        It's not technically a 2nd from Arizona, Philly will be receiving a compensatory pick for not signing Jay OBrien, so he's just adding a second for aesthetics I believe
        Zubrowka and Clarky11 liked this.
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 12:57 p.m.
        #8
        No longer a Virgin
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 6,027
        Likes: 2,607
        Quoting: sk540
        It's not technically a 2nd from Arizona, Philly will be receiving a compensatory pick for not signing Jay OBrien, so he's just adding a second for aesthetics I believe


        that's a thing? please explain I'm confused lol
        sk540 liked this.
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 2:04 p.m.
        #9
        GO FLAMES GO
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 18,291
        Likes: 10,632
        Quoting: stephane_robidas
        that's a thing? please explain I'm confused lol


        If a NCAA player who was drafted in the 1st round signs with another team, the original team gets a 2nd round pick
        sk540 and Ross_Johnston liked this.
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 2:06 p.m.
        #10
        Thread Starter
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2019
        Posts: 2,214
        Likes: 968
        Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
        Then you view them wrong. Sanheim is nowhere near as good as Weegar. Weegar was once again one of the top defensive defensemen in the league this year


        https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1580678814987755525?lang=en

        https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1550687397985263616

        I agree Weegar is better (hence why I added Brink), but you're being disingenuous if you're really going to claim Sanheim is "nowhere near as good"
        sk540 liked this.
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 2:07 p.m.
        #11
        No longer a Virgin
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Sep. 2020
        Posts: 6,027
        Likes: 2,607
        Quoting: Gmonwy
        If a NCAA player who was drafted in the 1st round signs with another team, the original team gets a 2nd round pick


        oh. i had absolutely no idea that was a thing. thanks
        sk540 liked this.
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 2:10 p.m.
        #12
        Flames Fan
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2017
        Posts: 82
        Likes: 11
        Would Philly have any interest in Hanifin or Zadorov?
        Hanifin would certainly cost (more than the above), but could be a good fit.
        Zadorov is in the Philly mould and would be less expensive than the trade above.
        Both players the Flames would consider moving for offence I would think.
        sk540 liked this.
        Apr. 20, 2023 at 2:23 p.m.
        #13
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2018
        Posts: 1,882
        Likes: 590
        Quoting: nomad
        Would Philly have any interest in Hanifin or Zadorov?
        Hanifin would certainly cost (more than the above), but could be a good fit.
        Zadorov is in the Philly mould and would be less expensive than the trade above.
        Both players the Flames would consider moving for offence I would think.



        Hanifin 100%. The flyers already have Deslauriers and Lemieux and Risto on the back end, so Zadarov would be redundant.

        What would a trade start with in your eyes for Hanifin.

        PS. This is all hypothetically based on if we miraculously land 1 or 2 in the draft and can speed up the process a bit.
        Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:03 p.m.
        #14
        Flames Fan
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2017
        Posts: 82
        Likes: 11
        Quoting: sk540
        Hanifin 100%. The flyers already have Deslauriers and Lemieux and Risto on the back end, so Zadarov would be redundant.

        What would a trade start with in your eyes for Hanifin.

        PS. This is all hypothetically based on if we miraculously land 1 or 2 in the draft and can speed up the process a bit.


        The Flames need a few solid hockey trades right now - not really interested in futures since they are committed to not rebuilding (that's an argument for a different day).

        I would think the target for Calgary would be Konecny, then balance out the trade as needed. Guessing that's not of great appeal to Philly fans though. Calgary needs Top 6 scoring forwards. Looking closer at the Philly roster, I'm not sure there is anyone Calgary would want that Philly would be willing to part with as part of a Hanifin trade.

        If Philly was interested in the inclusion of a B-level prospect of the Flames or Vladar, then maybe the appeal of going a bit younger and building in an area of need (D) using an area of strength (F) might appeal to them.
        sk540 liked this.
        Apr. 21, 2023 at 1:50 p.m.
        #15
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2018
        Posts: 1,882
        Likes: 590
        Quoting: nomad
        The Flames need a few solid hockey trades right now - not really interested in futures since they are committed to not rebuilding (that's an argument for a different day).

        I would think the target for Calgary would be Konecny, then balance out the trade as needed. Guessing that's not of great appeal to Philly fans though. Calgary needs Top 6 scoring forwards. Looking closer at the Philly roster, I'm not sure there is anyone Calgary would want that Philly would be willing to part with as part of a Hanifin trade.

        If Philly was interested in the inclusion of a B-level prospect of the Flames or Vladar, then maybe the appeal of going a bit younger and building in an area of need (D) using an area of strength (F) might appeal to them.


        I know that Torts really likes TK and I would be shocked he was moved. But hypotheticals are always fun.

        So the base is TK and Hanifin. What are the views on Calgary of Sanheim or Provorov? I'm getting at a blockbuster here to also include Lindholm. Would it start at TK, one of the dmen, and a prospect? Draft picks? Another top 6 forward? is it even plausible? Is Farabee of interest? Atkinson? Frost?

        This is fun.
        Apr. 21, 2023 at 6:48 p.m.
        #16
        Flames Fan
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2017
        Posts: 82
        Likes: 11
        Quoting: sk540
        I know that Torts really likes TK and I would be shocked he was moved. But hypotheticals are always fun.

        So the base is TK and Hanifin. What are the views on Calgary of Sanheim or Provorov? I'm getting at a blockbuster here to also include Lindholm. Would it start at TK, one of the dmen, and a prospect? Draft picks? Another top 6 forward? is it even plausible? Is Farabee of interest? Atkinson? Frost?

        This is fun.


        Haha... Agreed! Always fun to play GM.

        If Calgary was moving Hanifin, its because he is going to want a raise after next season and the Flames have too much tied up in other players - Weegar is basically taking Hanifin's $$. In moving him, the thinking would be that Kylington can come back next year and regain his form, but that's no guarantee. So though there could be a hole to fill in the top 4, the contracts of Sanheim and Provorov would be hard to fit in. With some retention on Provorov, maybe, but only if it meant getting the Top 6 forward we covet.

        Adding Lindholm brings in a WHOLE new dimension. He is Calgary's key trade chip - if they decide to trade him. Calgary would need a #1 centre to replace him. Maybe that come come from elsewhere, but hard to include him in a trade without knowing for sure there is a replacement.

        If Lindholm was a target - I suspect the starting ask would be something like Konecny, Forester, Frost, Pick. Lindholm is on a great contract for next year.

        Frost intrigues me, but I wonder what it would look like as part of a Hanifin trade. Anyone else on the Flames that interest you? Mangipane, Toffoli, Vladar, Dube, Kadri, Ruzicka...

        Hanifin ++
        Konecny, Frost, Provorov (included if needing to make salary work)
        Apr. 22, 2023 at 12:32 p.m.
        #17
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Apr. 2018
        Posts: 1,882
        Likes: 590
        Quoting: nomad
        Haha... Agreed! Always fun to play GM.

        If Calgary was moving Hanifin, its because he is going to want a raise after next season and the Flames have too much tied up in other players - Weegar is basically taking Hanifin's $$. In moving him, the thinking would be that Kylington can come back next year and regain his form, but that's no guarantee. So though there could be a hole to fill in the top 4, the contracts of Sanheim and Provorov would be hard to fit in. With some retention on Provorov, maybe, but only if it meant getting the Top 6 forward we covet.

        ::rolls up sleeves::

        Frost took a huge step this year and I would love to see him play a full year as kind of a 2C, with wingers like Tippett or Foerster - his 200 foot game really improved this year under Torts. I would definitely retain on Provy with only 2 years left, that would be fair and add some value to him.

        If i was looking at your roster, without Elias, I would be interested in a guy like Toffoli but I dont think would fit our timeline. Getting younger guys like Hanifin fits into where our current crop of younger players are, the 21-25 range, and Hanifin being only a year older. I've always loved Dube's game as well.

        Without Elias:
        Hanifin, Dube, Toffoli, 4th round pick

        TK, Frost, Provorov (2 mil retained), protected top 5 1st rounder

        With Elias:
        Hanifin, Elias, Dube

        TK, Frost, Farabee, Provorov (2.5 mil retained), A-/B+ prospect, 2024 Fla 1st round pick

        Thoughts? I could be way off, who knows....

        Adding Lindholm brings in a WHOLE new dimension. He is Calgary's key trade chip - if they decide to trade him. Calgary would need a #1 centre to replace him. Maybe that come come from elsewhere, but hard to include him in a trade without knowing for sure there is a replacement.

        If Lindholm was a target - I suspect the starting ask would be something like Konecny, Forester, Frost, Pick. Lindholm is on a great contract for next year.

        Frost intrigues me, but I wonder what it would look like as part of a Hanifin trade. Anyone else on the Flames that interest you? Mangipane, Toffoli, Vladar, Dube, Kadri, Ruzicka...

        Hanifin ++
        Konecny, Frost, Provorov (included if needing to make salary work)
        Apr. 24, 2023 at 1:12 p.m.
        #18
        Flames Fan
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Mar. 2017
        Posts: 82
        Likes: 11
        Quoting: sk540


        Toffoli is a weird one for the Flames too. Do we resign him? Strange to ask that question about the top goal scorer on the team. I think ultimately they do - especially if Sutter is sticking around.

        In both of the trades I feel like Calgary is giving up too much. The argument comes down to TK and Hanifin are valued. Provorov isn't of big interest, but with retained salary it helps. But Hanifin, Dube, Toffoli for TK and Frost + partial cap dump (granted with some value), wouldn't get it done I don't think. I could see it getting closer with Toffoli dropped perhaps.

        Lindholm, on his current deal, would require a big pay. Hard to value a trade with so many big pieces changing teams. Value might be right in your proposal, depending on prospect (Forester would be of interest).

        Hypothetical trade that would never happen:
        Hanifin, Dube, Lindholm

        TK, Frost, Farabee, Forester, 1st (Insert Provorov if needed for Salary, and add a lower pick from Calgary).

        Kind of works out to Lindholm for Frost, Forester, 1st, then Hanifin, Dube, and a pick for TK, Farabee and Provorov (retained)

        I'm sure fans on both sides would pick that apart, but it's fun to try!
        sk540 liked this.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll