SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A Realistic Matthews Trade based on the Tkachuk Trade

Created by: tkecanuck341
Team: 2023-24 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: May 9, 2023
Published: May 9, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Tkachuk (with an 8-year extension) was traded for two quality players in the final year of their contracts, as well as a lottery protected 1st round pick. There's no way LA is sending out Clarke, Byfield, Vilardi, Kempe, or any other quality young player under team control for 2+ years for a guy that they can sign as a UFA next summer.

I know that some of you are going to take issue with the amount of the Gavrikov extension. It's not the point of this ACGM, so this is just a placeholder. If he won't sign that deal, then the Kings will look elsewhere for a LHD.

I'm assuming based on Blake's comments from last week's exit interviews that he intends to let Petersen try to win back the net next season. If he can't then the Kings will address that during the season. Also not the point of this ACGM.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,250,000
2$1,250,000
1$874,125
1$787,500
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
6$4,250,000
Trades
1.
LAK
  1. Matthews, Auston
Additional Details:
Matthews signs 8-year extension
TOR
  1. Kopitar, Anze
  2. Madden, Tyler [RFA Rights]
  3. Roy, Matt
  4. 2024 1st round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
1st is lottery protected
2.
LAK
    Traded for draft picks.
    Termination Fees
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2023
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    2024
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    2025
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    Logo of the LAK
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$82,500,000$82,442,709$0$5,345,000$57,291
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $7,875,000$7,875,000
    RW, LW
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
    $11,640,250$11,640,250
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $4,200,000$4,200,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $4,000,000$4,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
    LW, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    RW, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    RW, LW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $1,675,000$1,675,000
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    C, LW, RW
    RFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $4,125,000$4,125,000
    LD
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $11,000,000$11,000,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $874,125$874,125
    LD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $1,700,000$1,700,000
    LD/RD
    RFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$1,550,000$2M)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $787,500$787,500
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
    $820,000$820,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
    RD
    RFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 9, 2023 at 12:34 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2021
    Posts: 4,269
    Likes: 657
    That's not realistic at all. Leafs have no interest in getting another aging veteran center.
    LosPatos and Mediumyeet liked this.
    May 9, 2023 at 12:34 a.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,651
    Likes: 6,181
    Quoting: KingExLeafs
    That's not realistic at all. Leafs have no interest in getting another aging veteran center.


    And the Kings have no interest in giving up quality young players for a guy they can have for free next summer.
    LosPatos liked this.
    May 9, 2023 at 12:37 a.m.
    #3
    LosPatos
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2019
    Posts: 3,375
    Likes: 1,894
    Jonathan Huberdeau is 29 years old
    Anze Kopitar is 35.

    Mackenzie Weegar was/is much better than Matt Roy (on the time at Florida)

    A more realistic value would be

    Fiala
    Gavrikov (if he weren’t a FA)
    2024 1st

    In all, the Leafs do not do this
    Mediumyeet and mk458 liked this.
    May 9, 2023 at 12:41 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,651
    Likes: 6,181
    Quoting: LosPatos
    Jonathan Huberdeau is 29 years old
    Anze Kopitar is 35.

    Mackenzie Weegar was/is much better than Matt Roy (on the time at Florida)

    A more realistic value would be

    Fiala
    Gavrikov (if he weren’t a FA)
    2024 1st

    In all, the Leafs do not do this


    Fiala has 6 years left on his contract. If Fiala was in the final year of his deal, then sure.

    I think Roy and Weegar are actually pretty close. Roy is defensively superior to Weegar, and he actually scored more goals this season (the first season in a long time that the Kings are actually offensively competent) than Weegar's career high.
    May 9, 2023 at 1:09 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2020
    Posts: 3,620
    Likes: 1,319
    This isn't close to comparable to the tkachuk trade. Kopitar is 36 going into the season. Huberdeau was 29 and coming off a 100+ pt season. Only thing comparable about this is they're pending UFA's.
    GladeBang12 and mk458 liked this.
    May 9, 2023 at 1:42 a.m.
    #6
    MK458
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 2,110
    Likes: 931
    I'm so confused by this... You say you're using the Tkachuk trade as comparable, and then you use 35 year old Anze Kopitar as the center piece of the trade. Huberdeau was 29 years old coming off a season where he was a heart trophy candidate. The kings don't have a forward with the pedigree that Huberdeau had coming off of last season. Huberdeau was considered a top 10, maybe even top 5 winger in the NHL at that time.

    Also Auston Matthews is a heart trophy winner and a 60 goal scorer. I think he would cost more than Tkachuk did if he's signing an extension. Obviously Tkachuk has now cemented himself as being similar caliber to Matthews, but at the time of the trade I don't think he was considered to be as valuable as Matthews.
    May 9, 2023 at 1:47 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,651
    Likes: 6,181
    Quoting: mk458
    I'm so confused by this... You say you're using the Tkachuk trade as comparable, and then you use 35 year old Anze Kopitar as the center piece of the trade. Huberdeau was 29 years old coming off a season where he was a heart trophy candidate. The kings don't have a forward with the pedigree that Huberdeau had coming off of last season. Huberdeau was considered a top 10, maybe even top 5 winger in the NHL at that time.

    Also Auston Matthews is a heart trophy winner and a 60 goal scorer. I think he would cost more than Tkachuk did if he's signing an extension. Obviously Tkachuk has now cemented himself as being similar caliber to Matthews, but at the time of the trade I don't think he was considered to be as valuable as Matthews.


    All fair points, but the main point is that it's still much more reasonable than the trades asking for Byfield, Clarke, and two 1sts.
    May 9, 2023 at 1:51 a.m.
    #8
    MK458
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 2,110
    Likes: 931
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    All fair points, but the main point is that it's still much more reasonable than the trades asking for Byfield, Clarke, and two 1sts.


    It all depends on what Toronto wants really. If they want key pieces to continue to contend, then LA probably isn't where he'll end up getting traded.
    May 9, 2023 at 1:54 a.m.
    #9
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 14,651
    Likes: 6,181
    Quoting: mk458
    It all depends on what Toronto wants really. If they want key pieces to continue to contend, then LA probably isn't where he'll end up getting traded.


    Which is perfectly fine, because then they'll just pursue him in the free agent sweepstakes next summer.
    mk458 liked this.
    May 9, 2023 at 2:02 a.m.
    #10
    MK458
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Dec. 2017
    Posts: 2,110
    Likes: 931
    Quoting: tkecanuck341
    Which is perfectly fine, because then they'll just pursue him in the free agent sweepstakes next summer.


    Exactly. I'm still hoping he goes home to Arizona though. If the NHL is going to keep a team there no matter what, I'd like them to at least have a franchise player to help grow the sport there
    May 9, 2023 at 7:15 a.m.
    #11
    Jimmy Stu
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2016
    Posts: 1,480
    Likes: 542
    This in no was compares to Tkachuk/huberdeau trade lol. I think what you're missing is if (which is a big if) he gets traded before UFA, it's probably to a place he'll sign an extension to maximize leafs return so there will be no free agent bidding war. A team either ponies up and extends him, or you lose out
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll