You could give us a 2nd to take Hoffman off your hands and we will say no

Because nobody is that nuts, chessnuts.

Unless they clear serious space I don't think Van considers that, but the value isn't far off.

Every team declines

I'd do Garland for Dvorak

Hawks decline. A 2nd for Allen? That pick is on the wrong side of that trade.

Canucks decline. Value is pretty good but they don't have the cap space for Dvorak.

Ducks Say No

You would give up the significantly better player for pretty much no cap savings?

Assuming Garland has little to no value on the trade market like people have speculated. Yes, because it allows you to allocate that money towards a 3C instead of paying to move Garland and then signing a FA like Barbashev (who isn't even really a center anymore).