Lol why would the rangers do that

Goodrow at 50% retention would be worth a 1st minimum league wide. Also if he is bought out, the buyout is negative 600k or so this year and next year. So New York actually saves cape for the first 2 years.

If Goodrow is bought out, which is possible, I would be very happy to sign him on the Leafs for 2m a year.

LA has no interest in moving Vilardi, regardless of what Winnipeg's reporter at The Athletic says.

Why would we want Hildeby when we have Portillo?

Why would we want Minten when we have Turcotte, Pinelli, Helenius and Hughes?

Why would we want to give up Gabe Vilardi when he's proven that we were right to be patient with him, when the return is two prospects we don't need and a chance to draft a player who probably has no shot at having Vilardi's potential?

Rangers would rather just buy Goodrow out. There's zero benefit to them retaining salary for 4 years when their cap is so tight, on top of having to give up a 3rd.

I wouldn’t pay that price for Gabriel.

of all the Murray to AZ proposals this maybe the worst, AZ moves up maybe 10-12 spots to take that awful contract PASS

Leaf fans with another useless trade to LA. Non of that gets Vilardi. LA passes quickly.

You want a trade from LA...Iafallo, Durzi +25 1st for Nylander. That's the best LA can do with their cap situation.

Oh so exactly what Chicago did to take 2 years of Mrazek at 4 million. You’re dumb

Ok youre right it is such a great trade AZ should do it, or how about see if CHI do it gain. AZ PASS