SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Does lindholm extended work

Created by: Friendly_Cannon
Team: 2024-25 Columbus Blue Jackets
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 15, 2023
Published: Jun. 16, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Here’s the outlook on the team if we move for lindholm.

We have around 13 million in space after his 8.5 million dollar extension kicks in. If these other contracts are around what they will be making on their next deals, we may need to offload a few more players to make the cap work.

I would move peeke this summer and not resign bean after his deal is up (preferably trade him at the deadline or flip his rights)
Buying out/ moving gudbranson would be the most idea outcome but I can’t see jarmo buying him out only 2 years removed from signing him.

This is missing some smaller guys like blankenburg and foudy but the money they have earned shouldn’t impact too much.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,750,000
6$6,000,000
2$1,875,000
1$1,150,000
2$2,000,000
1$2,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$8,500,000
CREATEDYEARSCAP HIT
Carlsson, Leo
2$950,000
Trades
CBJ
CGY
  1. Boqvist, Adam
  2. Sillinger, Cole [RFA Rights]
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (CBJ)
  4. 2024 1st round pick (CBJ)
Additional Details:
RETURN DOES NOT MATTER. I would assume this package will be something like this but not purpose of this acgm
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CBJ
2024
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
2025
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the VGK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$84,500,000$88,243,333$0$1,082,500-$3,743,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,750,000$9,750,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, RW
UFA
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C, RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW, C
RFA
Carlsson, Leo
$950,000$950,000
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
RFA
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$3,750,000$3,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,875,000$1,875,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$925,000$925,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,500,000$2,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$9,583,333$9,583,333
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,725,000$4,725,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,050,000$1,050,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 16, 2023 at 1:37 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 994
Likes: 227
Imo Flames accept
Jun. 16, 2023 at 1:45 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 9,711
Likes: 4,628
If the Flames go into full sell off and rebuild mode I could see that being accepted, but I'd expect with a new coach etc they'll try and keep it all together for at least this season and go for it, and maybe sell off at the TDL if it's a fail.
Jun. 16, 2023 at 1:59 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,924
Likes: 19,955
I'm assuming Jiricek is getting another year in the AHL here right?

I would suggest selling Peeke this summer personally and run Blankenberg. It's also probably a safe bet that Bean is not a long term option on the team either.

As for your contracts, I don't think Marchenko has done remotely enough to earn that kind of deal, if anything Johnson is more likely to get something like that
Civil_Eng_PE and SK101 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2023 at 2:29 p.m.
#4
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 783
Likes: 948
I think CBJ are going to try and get Lindholm after hearing that the deal with Hayes is now less likely to happen. HOWEVER, I think that Boqvist isn't going to be traded this off season. Jiricek is not ready yet and Boqvist is a good player if he can stay healthy. I think if you take Boqvist out of that trade, CBJ accept. Calgary also do not need RD. I hope Jarmo can pull it off. I think he fits the team perfectly and already has a great chemistry with Johnny. Peeke and Bean def need to go though. We have RD already so Peeke is redundant and I honestly like Svozil so Bean becomes obsolete. Cut both of those players and we sign Lindholm long term to be 1C for the next 2-3 years and then hopefully Carlsson after. Its a perfect fit
SK101 liked this.
Jun. 16, 2023 at 2:40 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,924
Likes: 19,955
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE
I think CBJ are going to try and get Lindholm after hearing that the deal with Hayes is now less likely to happen. HOWEVER, I think that Boqvist isn't going to be traded this off season. Jiricek is not ready yet and Boqvist is a good player if he can stay healthy. I think if you take Boqvist out of that trade, CBJ accept. Calgary also do not need RD. I hope Jarmo can pull it off. I think he fits the team perfectly and already has a great chemistry with Johnny. Peeke and Bean def need to go though. We have RD already so Peeke is redundant and I honestly like Svozil so Bean becomes obsolete. Cut both of those players and we sign Lindholm long term to be 1C for the next 2-3 years and then hopefully Carlsson after. Its a perfect fit


Calgary would not accept if Boqvist (or similar in value) is not there
Civil_Eng_PE liked this.
Jun. 16, 2023 at 2:47 p.m.
#6
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 783
Likes: 948
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Calgary would not accept if Boqvist (or similar in value) is not there


Makes sense. What about Ceulemans instead of Boqvist?
Jun. 16, 2023 at 2:52 p.m.
#7
not a he )
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 4,691
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I'm assuming Jiricek is getting another year in the AHL here right?

I would suggest selling Peeke this summer personally and run Blankenberg. It's also probably a safe bet that Bean is not a long term option on the team either.

As for your contracts, I don't think Marchenko has done remotely enough to earn that kind of deal, if anything Johnson is more likely to get something like that


Definitely agree on the KJ vs. Marchenko point, but Marchenko is several years older and coming from the KHL. There is the element of "he's earned a payday now rather than after a bridge" to his next contract that you can't really argue for Johnson. A bridge for KJ is more likely, but probably also closer to 5 than what this shows.

I'm perfectly fine with the return above for Lindholm. I have no issue with including Boqvist. Also no issue with an even higher cost than that provided that the obvious 3OA/KJ/Jiricek are not included. There's no way both Boqvist and Peeke are here next season, possibly even both are gone. The element of risk is still undeniable since Lindholm can't be extended til the first of July. If they trade for Lindholm and he won't extend with Columbus, that's a massive failure. I trust them to do their due dilligence, much like they did with Severson, but I can't just ignore the risk. That's what makes me hesitate on the deal more than anything.
Civil_Eng_PE liked this.
Jun. 16, 2023 at 3:09 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,924
Likes: 19,955
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE
Makes sense. What about Ceulemans instead of Boqvist?


I would be interested in Ceulemans and Dumais instead of Boqvist and the 2nd
Civil_Eng_PE liked this.
Jun. 16, 2023 at 3:13 p.m.
#9
Yegor bomb
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2022
Posts: 783
Likes: 948
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I would be interested in Ceulemans and Dumais instead of Boqvist and the 2nd


We'll see what happens. A trade would have to go down in the next two weeks so it gets done before the draft. I definitely think Jarmo has been asking and Lindholm has been asked if he's resigning or not. Going to be another crazy off season
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll