ROUND 1 | TEAM | ORIGINAL | PLAYER | DETAILS |
---|
1 | - | No words are needed here... | ||
2 | - | Adam Fantilli (+1 ) | Leo is a great player and a very similar guy to Sundin on the ice, but Fantilli could mark CLB hockey in a way that no one else ever did... | |
3 | - | Leo Carlsson (-1 ) | Leo still goes 3rd and may end up being a player that is impactful like Getzlaf was a couple years ago for ANA | |
4 | - | Smith stays at 4, nothing else to say | ||
5 | - | I still prefer Leonard, however, I have been seeing more and more stuff on how many teams had Reinbacher higher than Michkov, such as NSH trying to trade up to 5th OA for him, Zona obviously, WSH, and even Philly we rumored to be very hesitant between David and Michkov if both players were on the table for him. I like Leonard's ceiling a little bit more, but it proves that I'm no scout and that Reinbacher might legitimately have potential to be a top 10 D in the league | ||
6 | - | Matvei Michkov (+1 ) | For the sake of the talent, Michkov goes here | |
7 | - | Ryan Leonard (+1 ) | Leonard is an easy choice here. As I have said for a long time, he is the 3rd Tkachuk brother and I love that. I think WSH are big winners by getting him at 8 | |
8 | - | Zach Benson (+5 ) | I do really like Benson's potential, however, I don't know how much % he got to reach it... | |
9 | - | Dalibor Dvorsky (+1 ) | Personally, Dvorsky over Danielson, but they are both really similar, just Dvorsky has a better ceiling in my eyes. | |
10 | - | Dmitri Simashev (-4 ) | Not a huge fan of Simashev overall, but he is a good shutdown guy who could put 35 pts in his prime, so decent player | |
11 | - | Axel Sandin Pellikka (+6 ) | I really like ASP, I hope that defending won't be too much of a problem since his offense is so interesting | |
12 | Colby Barlow (+6 ) | Barlow's goal scoring is very good, and I think he should've gone higher | ||
13 | - | Matthew Wood (+2 ) | The "next Tage Thompson" to Buffalo? That would've been cool! | |
14 | - | Oliver Moore (+5 ) | Decent player in Moore. He won't be as dominant as many people think he might be, but with Bedard on his pp, it could help him put flashy numbers. | |
15 | - | Nate Danielson (-6 ) | Not an awful pick, its just a bit high as of now... | |
16 | - | Gabe Perreault (+7 ) | Perreault might be great. He has pure talent if he can figure it all out | |
17 | ||||
18 | - | |||
19 | ||||
20 | - | |||
21 | - | |||
22 | ||||
23 | - | |||
24 | ||||
25 | ||||
26 | ||||
27 | - | |||
28 | ||||
29 | ||||
30 | - | |||
31 | ||||
32 | - |