SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sabres will be dangerous

Created by: BigDog91
Team: 2024-25 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 16, 2023
Published: Aug. 16, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$7,000,000
8$10,000,000
3$3,000,000
Trades
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NSH
2026
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$83,500,000$74,842,736$0$3,500,000$8,657,264
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,142,857$7,142,857
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$855,833$855,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,100,000$7,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$918,333$918,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,285,714$4,285,714
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$10,000,000$10,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,100,000$4,100,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,333,333$3,333,333
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 16, 2023 at 10:47 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,808
Likes: 14,531
Boston isn't doing that
Aug. 16, 2023 at 10:55 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2,012
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Boston isn't doing that


If Levi comes in as advertised, Buffalo isn't doing that.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 11:01 a.m.
#3
BostonBoy17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 628
Likes: 192
I disagree with the above, if nothing materializes in the Bruins center market, converting Mittelstadt is worth moving Ullmark. Carlo move is tough and UPL isn't really of interest to the Bruins because of Swayman, but if it's swapped for a good prospect or a 1st round pick, it may be worth it for the Bs, but the trade of Mittelstadt for Ullmark can be built around.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 11:56 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 99
Likes: 30
Quoting: beantownboy17
I disagree with the above, if nothing materializes in the Bruins center market, converting Mittelstadt is worth moving Ullmark. Carlo move is tough and UPL isn't really of interest to the Bruins because of Swayman, but if it's swapped for a good prospect or a 1st round pick, it may be worth it for the Bs, but the trade of Mittelstadt for Ullmark can be built around.


agreed, but maybe Krebs instead of Middlestadt too? might not be any additional return, but i think works better for Bs.
Ullmark under good contract at his current level of play (IF) he waives, carries them in to Levi end of next year. Let's them take the Ullmark/Swayman 1a/1b type route
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 12:01 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 2,012
Quoting: beantownboy17
I disagree with the above, if nothing materializes in the Bruins center market, converting Mittelstadt is worth moving Ullmark. Carlo move is tough and UPL isn't really of interest to the Bruins because of Swayman, but if it's swapped for a good prospect or a 1st round pick, it may be worth it for the Bs, but the trade of Mittelstadt for Ullmark can be built around.


Possibly. But if Levi comes in and does what we think he can do, why would the Sabres take on Ullmark? If thatvis the case, even of for just one year, that is money better spent elsewhere imo. Carlo everyone gets. One of the best stay-at-home D in the NHL. Even this fit depends on Jokiharju imo..... this is the make it or break it year for him in Buffalo.

Just a deal that works if a certain set of circumstances fall in place I think.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 12:12 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
This looks A LOT like a deal i proposed on here not too long ago

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4491353

Sabres get
-Ullmark
-Carlo

Bruins get
-Mittelstadt
-Ostlund
-Jokiharju
-UPL


@BigDog91
@beantownboy17
@JMB423
Aug. 16, 2023 at 12:27 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,800
Likes: 8,840
They would be. But Boston does not even consider that,

Take out everything but Mitts and Ullmark, then build around it. You are not getting Carlo.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 2:12 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Gofnut999
They would be. But Boston does not even consider that,

Take out everything but Mitts and Ullmark, then build around it. You are not getting Carlo.


We aren’t gonna trade u a center for a goalie though
Aug. 16, 2023 at 2:28 p.m.
#9
BostonBoy17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 628
Likes: 192
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
This looks A LOT like a deal i proposed on here not too long ago

https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4491353

Sabres get
-Ullmark
-Carlo

Bruins get
-Mittelstadt
-Ostlund
-Jokiharju
-UPL


BigDog91
beantownboy17
JMB423


I think I remember seeing this too. Yeah this makes for a better package, but UPL is still superfluous. We could take if we thought we could flip him but I would think Buffalo just shops him elsewhere. If Carlo is involved there's gotta be a high value prospect or pick going back, and Ostlund is borderline for that designation. Kulich is obviously a done deal, if Carlo is involved, but I figure he's not up for trade. Rousek would be appealing too.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 2:41 p.m.
#10
BostonBoy17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 628
Likes: 192
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
We aren’t gonna trade u a center for a goalie though


Why not? Position of strength for a position of need on both sides, it makes perfect sense. Thompson and Cozens are locked in at 1 and 2 C and eventually, they'll have prospects who have too much potential to leave out of the lineup.

Savoie, Kulich, and Krebs are not 4Cs by skillset so they need spots. And using this lineup as an example, the glaring problem for Buffalo is they have zero veteran depth, it's not a balanced team unless you bring in some maturity.
gretzkyghosts liked this.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 3:10 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: beantownboy17
Why not? Position of strength for a position of need on both sides, it makes perfect sense. Thompson and Cozens are locked in at 1 and 2 C and eventually, they'll have prospects who have too much potential to leave out of the lineup.

Savoie, Kulich, and Krebs are not 4Cs by skillset so they need spots. And using this lineup as an example, the glaring problem for Buffalo is they have zero veteran depth, it's not a balanced team unless you bring in some maturity.


Bc even though Ullmark won the Vezina, we had him here in Buffalo & we know that he’s not actually a stud- he’s a slightly above average goalie who benefited from having a great team in front of him

Carlo would be the main piece we are after,
Ullmark would be secondary

Maybe that’s just the way i see it though??
Aug. 16, 2023 at 3:16 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: beantownboy17
I think I remember seeing this too. Yeah this makes for a better package, but UPL is still superfluous. We could take if we thought we could flip him but I would think Buffalo just shops him elsewhere. If Carlo is involved there's gotta be a high value prospect or pick going back, and Ostlund is borderline for that designation. Kulich is obviously a done deal, if Carlo is involved, but I figure he's not up for trade. Rousek would be appealing too.


I included UPL in the trade to be a backup to Swayman

As far as the trade goes,
Rousek could be available, but if u guys wanted him over Ostlund i think you’d be nuts. Ostlund was picked in the mid1st for a reason. I actually chose him bc i figured his 2way play would fit in with what u we’re looking for.
Regardless, we have plenty of prospects to make the deal work out.


I think the biggest roadblock to a deal would be that our 2 teams probably wouldn’t wanna help each other out, being that we are rivals & all

A deal between us 2 would make a lot of sense though
Aug. 16, 2023 at 3:36 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 19,800
Likes: 8,840
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
We aren’t gonna trade u a center for a goalie though



Cool, don’t. We are not trading Carlo.

Mitts is better off at wing anyway and not all that interested in him. 🤷🏻‍♂️

It’s also why i said build a package around it.
Aug. 16, 2023 at 3:55 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 3,744
Quoting: Gofnut999
Cool, don’t. We are not trading Carlo.

Mitts is better off at wing anyway and not all that interested in him. 🤷🏻‍♂️

It’s also why i said build a package around it.


Yeah, yeah, yeah….
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll