Edited Oct. 4, 2023 at 1:54 p.m.
Quoting: MoxNix
The only one missing the point and going off on a tangent is you. Zary wouldn't be stealing a spot he'd be replacing Pinto... For less money and since he's a year younger he'd be all 3 of under team control, waiver exempt and not eligible for arbitration longer.
He's also better and more valuable than Kastelic, McEwen, Joseph (IOW your entire 4th line according to Daily Faceoff) and Kubalic.
So a player with ZERO NHL games is better than players with a lot of NHL experience?
Greig, Giroux and even Jarventie could be playing Center if Pinto is not there. They don't really need Zary as they have their own prospects that are NHL ready. Without Pinto, I would go :
Tkachuk - Stutzle - Tarasenko
Jarventie - Norris - Batherson
Kubalik- Greig - Giroux
Smejkal - Kastelic - Joseph
MacEwen
Jarventie and Batherson look fantastic together and Norris and Batherson were deadly together last time Norris was there.
Joseph is one of the best skaters in the league, pretty good defensively (elite on PK) and scores about 30 ES pts per 82 games.
Kubalik is a consistent 20 goals 40 pts guy
Greig is a blue chip prospect
Kastelic was top-12 in FO% last season. He's also a fitness freak in a big man's body, pretty intimidating. He also holds his own defensively and has even a bit of a scoring touch. He is the 4th line Center going forward.
Smejkal has looked great in preseason but also unproven at the NHL level, however he's older and has pro experience. Yes I would take Zary over him but trading Pinto to have Zary on the 4th line? Doesn't seem super smart
MacEwen is unfortunately signed on a 1-way for 3 years, kinda stuck with him as it's doubtful they'd send him to the AHL right away but if possible I'd have Zary over him
All that said, you still missed the point, which I will tell as it seems necessary, it was a slight at Dorion and him waiving players that were Zary's age last season. The value you proposed isn't bad at all. I didn't even intend to comment on that. You just forced me into this debate by missing the point twice.