SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Taking advantage of cap

Created by: BluesReport18
Team: 2023-24 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 13, 2023
Published: Oct. 13, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. 2024 1st round pick (EDM)
  4. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Entwistle, Mackenzie
  2. Mrázek, Petr ($1,900,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
Recapture Fees
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$79,790,957$0$7,455,000$3,709,043
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,950,000$4,950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$505,000$505K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$758,333$758,333
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,200,000$1,200,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 2
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000 ($4,850,000$5M$4,850,000$5M)
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 13, 2023 at 10:11 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2022
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 1,061
Canucks decline. They aren’t in the market to be moving a 1st, especially in a cap dump. They aren’t paying to dump Garland or Myers either, if that’s truly how other teams view them then they’ll just keep them instead.
palhal liked this.
Oct. 13, 2023 at 10:11 p.m.
#2
CustomVan92
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 177
Likes: 58
I dont think edmonton wants Mrazek. I think they would rather have mrazek just not be in the trade so they can fully save the cap
Garak liked this.
Oct. 13, 2023 at 10:30 p.m.
#3
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 7,728
Likes: 2,226
Hell yeah do it up
Oct. 13, 2023 at 11:35 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 605
Likes: 211
Canucks say no but I could see Edmonton saying yes to that
Oct. 14, 2023 at 1:08 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 357
Quoting: Canuckfan98
Canucks say no but I could see Edmonton saying yes to that

Yeah ur a troll if u actually think edmonton would do that
Oct. 14, 2023 at 1:19 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 316
Edmonton could almost get Bedard for that package
Oct. 14, 2023 at 2:28 a.m.
#7
Bulklav Jr.Star 03
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 261
The draft picks going to Chicago doesn't make sense

I could see Myers playing in Chicago but if Vancouver stays healthy and is winning they're probably keeping the group they have for the rest of the year

Katchouk is looking pretty good right now .... And don't help Edmonton let them have their goalie issue

Soderblom looked good in the loss to Boston the net is ok for the Hawks right now.
Oct. 14, 2023 at 3:27 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1,595
EDM says no.
Oct. 14, 2023 at 8:16 a.m.
#9
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 3,430
Quoting: Canuckfan98
Canucks say no but I could see Edmonton saying yes to that


That’s funny because I thought the Hawks would say no to the Vancouver proposal and yes to the Edmonton deal.
Garak liked this.
Oct. 14, 2023 at 6:36 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 605
Likes: 211
Quoting: Oilers_29
Yeah ur a troll if u actually think edmonton would do that


well what do you think it would cost to drop a 4 year cap dump at 5 million dollars per yer?
Oct. 14, 2023 at 6:39 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 605
Likes: 211
Quoting: Snowhawk18
That’s funny because I thought the Hawks would say no to the Vancouver proposal and yes to the Edmonton deal.


the Canucks aren't going to start trading their own first round pick unless they get a young cost controlled player back, it makes no sense for them to dump Myers with a 1st when he only has one year left. garland isn't a that much of a negative where he would cost a 1st to dump, it would be better off if they just retained on him and got some value in return.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll