SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Toronto Blockbuster for Tanev

Created by: KingofRnR
Team: 2023-24 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 6, 2023
Published: Nov. 7, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$79,375,699$0$212,500$4,124,301
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW, C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$825,000$825,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,200,000$2,200,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Taxi Squad
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$775,000$775,000 ($0$0$0$0)
LW, C
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 7, 2023 at 12:16 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,407
Likes: 19,604
Gross, he's not worth 10M
KingofRnR liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 12:16 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
No one is packaging all their trade chips. Leafs also aren't moving Nylander while pushing for the playoffs and cups, similarly how Calgary didn't trade Gaudreau the year they won the Pacific. If the Leafs want Tanev then they can pay a good prospect or their first round pick, Neimala or their pick. If they want to dump Klingberg then they can add a 2nd or put a prospect like Voit or Steeves because taking on Klingberg is strictly a favour move for cap reasons so Toronto can continue to add.

Tanev @ 50% for Neimala OR a 1st
Tanev for Klingberg, 1st, Voit
KingofRnR liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 12:22 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 1,845
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Gross, he's not worth 10M

That’s probably the minimum Nylander wants, but what do you think and is he a good target or no!? I personally think Reinhart might be the better target, since he’ll be cheaper and already has history with Huberdeau
Nov. 7, 2023 at 1:09 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 666
Quoting: KingofRnR
That’s probably the minimum Nylander wants, but what do you think and is he a good target or no!? I personally think Reinhart might be the better target, since he’ll be cheaper and already has history with Huberdeau


Any elite talent coming in would have to get 10.5 to match Huby wouldn't they? I believe that's what his ask was rumored to be. I would be terrified that it doesn't work or he takes his money and turns into a punkin.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 1:51 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Edited Nov. 7, 2023 at 2:05 a.m.
Leafs decline in a heartbeat, way too much for 0 purpose, wasting Lindholm at 2RW or 3C cause he isn’t playing higher in the line-up or probably doesn’t match Willy’s current rate of production, Dubé takes Robby’s spot-on the 3rd line at best which he doesn’t need to, We Tried Hunt didn’t like him & don’t need him, Tanev is the only piece here the Leafs would actually look at, Also Lilly & Willy aren’t being moved at all but you already know this
Nov. 7, 2023 at 1:54 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,605
Likes: 915
Quoting: yycofred
No one is packaging all their trade chips. Leafs also aren't moving Nylander while pushing for the playoffs and cups, similarly how Calgary didn't trade Gaudreau the year they won the Pacific. If the Leafs want Tanev then they can pay a good prospect or their first round pick, Neimala or their pick. If they want to dump Klingberg then they can add a 2nd or put a prospect like Voit or Steeves because taking on Klingberg is strictly a favour move for cap reasons so Toronto can continue to add.

Tanev 50% for Neimala OR a 1st
Tanev for Klingberg, 1st, Voit


How about this, say 2024 1st + 2026 3rd, Voit, Timmins & Klingberg for Tanev 50%?
Nov. 7, 2023 at 3:02 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,407
Likes: 19,604
Quoting: KingofRnR
That’s probably the minimum Nylander wants, but what do you think and is he a good target or no!? I personally think Reinhart might be the better target, since he’ll be cheaper and already has history with Huberdeau


Not with the loss of Lindholm, its counterproductive
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:01 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 3,180
Nylander only makes sense for Calgary if he comes with an extension AND we have Lindholm extended long term. Trading Lindholm for Nylander makes absolutely no sense at all.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 7:58 a.m.
#9
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2023
Posts: 2,981
Likes: 590
Leafs decline quickly
T0R liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 1:04 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 1,845
Quoting: MoxNix
Nylander only makes sense for Calgary if he comes with an extension AND we have Lindholm extended long term. Trading Lindholm for Nylander makes absolutely no sense at all.

Agreed, I was just tired of the constant & daily + extremely weak TOR AGM's for Tanev, so made this one to get their reactions lol

Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Not with the loss of Lindholm, its counterproductive

Is it just me or does Lindholm seem completely checked out of Calgary already!? Watching his facial expressions on the ice, bench and walking on to the ice or back to the locker room, he just doesn't seem very happy or interested right now
Nov. 7, 2023 at 1:12 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 1,845
Quoting: yycofred
No one is packaging all their trade chips. Leafs also aren't moving Nylander while pushing for the playoffs and cups, similarly how Calgary didn't trade Gaudreau the year they won the Pacific. If the Leafs want Tanev then they can pay a good prospect or their first round pick, Neimala or their pick. If they want to dump Klingberg then they can add a 2nd or put a prospect like Voit or Steeves because taking on Klingberg is strictly a favour move for cap reasons so Toronto can continue to add.

Tanev 50% for Neimala OR a 1st
Tanev for Klingberg, 1st, Voit

What are your thoughts on Niemela!? He's undersized for the NHL and doesn't really fit our identity, no!? Same goes for Voit. What do we need another Left Winger for and a scrawny one at that!?

I think we get a better 1st Round Pick and/or Prospect from another Team for Tanev. Liljegren is more intriguing, but some guys aren't sold on him becoming the player he was projected too either. He hasn't been able to step up and face stiffer competition like they need him too. He's obviously not trusted by the coaching staff to play certain situations
MoxNix liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 1:29 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Quoting: KingofRnR
What are your thoughts on Niemela!? He's undersized for the NHL and doesn't really fit our identity, no!? Same goes for Voit. What do we need another Left Winger for and a scrawny one at that!?

I think we get a better 1st Round Pick and/or Prospect from another Team for Tanev. Liljegren is more intriguing, but some guys aren't sold on him becoming the player he was projected too either. He hasn't been able to step up and face stiffer competition like they need him too. He's obviously not trusted by the coaching staff to play certain situations


He's the same size as 26 year old Kylington while maybe giving up 5 pounds. Kylington's draft profile has him as the same height and lighter than Niemala and they fit a very similar profile, I think getting a good skating puck moving D man on the right side as opposed to the left is a bit of an albatross. You can fill out the LD through free agency and the draft fairly easily but Neimala would be a really nice fit in the pipeline and the roster in the window that the Flames would need him more than Liljegren.

Agreed they can get a better pick and they should be doing everything the can to acquire Edmonton's right now. If you are getting the Leafs 1st then the prospect will be a lottery ticket. He has very similar numbers in junior as Phillips did, he's got a bigger frame and can get bigger than Phillips though. Not much but at least add some muscle. Voit could become something but likely a good AHL piece with some offensive upside that pushes for a spot in a pinch.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 2:01 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 1,845
Quoting: yycofred
He's the same size as 26 year old Kylington while maybe giving up 5 pounds. Kylington's draft profile has him as the same height and lighter than Niemala and they fit a very similar profile, I think getting a good skating puck moving D man on the right side as opposed to the left is a bit of an albatross. You can fill out the LD through free agency and the draft fairly easily but Neimala would be a really nice fit in the pipeline and the roster in the window that the Flames would need him more than Liljegren.

Agreed they can get a better pick and they should be doing everything the can to acquire Edmonton's right now. If you are getting the Leafs 1st then the prospect will be a lottery ticket. He has very similar numbers in junior as Phillips did, he's got a bigger frame and can get bigger than Phillips though. Not much but at least add some muscle. Voit could become something but likely a good AHL piece with some offensive upside that pushes for a spot in a pinch.

Yeah, European Players, especially D-Men and especially of the Finnish Variety (remember Valimaki) make me nervous. Kylington was skilled, could skate and stick check, but his transitions and overall strength were brutal. I prefer North American D-Men who are used to playing the smaller ice surface and more physical game of hockey personally. That said, we are lacking depth at RD, so any addition there would be nice.

Obviously there's room in the game for skilled smaller guys and Gaudreau proved that, but after the whole Matthew Phillips fiasco, I feel like you can draft someone with Height who will eventually bulk up, but we should stay away from Drafting or Bringing in Small Guys. We already declined to qualify Jack beck and Rory Kerins who was similarly successful offensively to Voit in the OHL isn't really doing much in the AHL either, so Voit's just not a guy that really peaks my interest. Abruzzese would be better imo

Yes, I definitely see value in Trading Tanev to EDM who's 1st Round Pick will for sure be more valuable than TOR's. I'm not ready to give up on our season just yet, but I do see the value in moving Tanev now while he's Healthy instead of waiting and something happening that brings his value down. At least we should be able to get Ceci back as a replacement player to keep going, with the ability to Trade him in the off-season or flip him next season. Liljegren would have been a replacement player too, but TOR Fans are balking at moving him and now he's injured, so he's not as appealing
Nov. 7, 2023 at 2:17 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yeah, European Players, especially D-Men and especially of the Finnish Variety (remember Valimaki) make me nervous. Kylington was skilled, could skate and stick check, but his transitions and overall strength were brutal. I prefer North American D-Men who are used to playing the smaller ice surface and more physical game of hockey personally. That said, we are lacking depth at RD, so any addition there would be nice.

Obviously there's room in the game for skilled smaller guys and Gaudreau proved that, but after the whole Matthew Phillips fiasco, I feel like you can draft someone with Height who will eventually bulk up, but we should stay away from Drafting or Bringing in Small Guys. We already declined to qualify Jack beck and Rory Kerins who was similarly successful offensively to Voit in the OHL isn't really doing much in the AHL either, so Voit's just not a guy that really peaks my interest. Abruzzese would be better imo

Yes, I definitely see value in Trading Tanev to EDM who's 1st Round Pick will for sure be more valuable than TOR's. I'm not ready to give up on our season just yet, but I do see the value in moving Tanev now while he's Healthy instead of waiting and something happening that brings his value down. At least we should be able to get Ceci back as a replacement player to keep going, with the ability to Trade him in the off-season or flip him next season. Liljegren would have been a replacement player too, but TOR Fans are balking at moving him and now he's injured, so he's not as appealing


Small sample size but it looks like Niemala is transitioning to the NA game really well in the AHL already, perhaps better than Kylington. I think the ceiling there is higher than either Valimaki or Kylington.

I don't think the Flames have given up on the season, in reality they're 4 points out of a wild card with 75+ games to play and a goaltender that's giving them a shot every night. I do think they should look at what Nashville did last season with the Ekholm, Jeannot, Nino trades. They acquired futures while keeping a team on the ice that was competitive to the end of the year. Calgary has enough pieces that they can turn this around very very quick, ideally when the new rink is opening.
KingofRnR liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 2:49 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 3,180
Quoting: yycofred
Small sample size but it looks like Niemala is transitioning to the NA game really well in the AHL already, perhaps better than Kylington. I think the ceiling there is higher than either Valimaki or Kylington.

I don't think the Flames have given up on the season, in reality they're 4 points out of a wild card with 75+ games to play and a goaltender that's giving them a shot every night. I do think they should look at what Nashville did last season with the Ekholm, Jeannot, Nino trades. They acquired futures while keeping a team on the ice that was competitive to the end of the year. Calgary has enough pieces that they can turn this around very very quick, ideally when the new rink is opening.


Kylington has very high end speed and will take a hit to make a play. He gets knocked down a bit too easily but no matter how many times he gets knocked down he always gets back up and doesn't shy away from getting hit again. Also we have Poirier in the system bigger and more skilled than than Kylington / Niemela. Behind Poirier is 2023 draft pick Morin another excellent offensive defenseman prospect.
KingofRnR liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 2:57 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2021
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 903
Quoting: MoxNix
Kylington has very high end speed and will take a hit to make a play. He gets knocked down a bit too easily but no matter how many times he gets knocked down he always gets back up and doesn't shy away from getting hit again. Also we have Poirier in the system bigger and more skilled than than Kylington / Niemela. Behind Poirier is 2023 draft pick Morin another excellent offensive defenseman prospect.


All on the left side. It would be a good problem to have to have too much depth with mobile d man that transition well. I hope we see Poirier in the NHL this season.
KingofRnR liked this.
Nov. 7, 2023 at 3:27 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,820
Likes: 1,845
Quoting: yycofred
All on the left side. It would be a good problem to have to have too much depth with mobile d man that transition well. I hope we see Poirier in the NHL this season.

If Hanifin's looking for $7mil/yr+, I'd like to move him and keep Zadorov, which would open up a space to acquire Jake Bean to compete with Poirier (I'd say Kylington as well, but I doubt we see him play for the Flames ever again at this point)

Another Guy I'd like to Trade Hanifin for is Ryan Graves + a Pick/Prospect if possible, he might make Zadorov expendable too. Maybe Zadorov signs long-term for $2.75-3.75 x 3-6yrs!?

Then it'd become a competition between Gilbert & Solovyov for that last Roster spot
MoxNix liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll