Canucks decline. Savard has just as bad, if not a worse contract than Garland. I’d be hesitant to swap them straight up, definitely not adding a 1st to Garland.

Garland >> Savard
1st >>>> 3rd

Zero reason for the Canucks to do that

Canucks say no chance.

I mean someone will pay you for Savard 50% retained at the deadline next year. Until then he's a negative asset. That's a hard no from the Canucks.

Garland isnt a pure cap dump, but Savard is. Easy no from VAN

As a hardcore Habs fan, all these trades are way too tilted in Montreal's favour.

I mean, that's the norm on this site. Everybody pulls the bed sheets their way, but this is a bit much though.

I based the Savard one on a post made by a VAN fan earlier. The Garland-Mantha swap has been proposed by both teams fans for a month. How is the EDM one lopsided in MTLs favor? Campbells deal is probably the worst in the league. Teams have been paying a 1st for moving one year of players making similar money… Soup has got 3 more years after this season! Definitely would cost them the equivalent of 2 first to move (Holloway being equivalent to a first imo). Then theres the 2024 first/2024 second swap which is made equivalent by adding Allen and Kovacevic which IMO is even lopsided in EDMs favor.