SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Do or die

Created by: kawhislaugh
Team: 2023-24 Edmonton Oilers
Initial Creation Date: Nov. 22, 2023
Published: Nov. 24, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
2.
EDM
  1. Peeke, Andrew ($1,375,000 retained)
CBJ
  1. Desharnais, Vincent
  2. Foegele, Warren
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (EDM)
3.
EDM
  1. Bjugstad, Nick ($1,050,000 retained)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
2026
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the EDM
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$79,666,667$850,000$4,200,000$3,833,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$12,500,000$12,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000 (Performance Bonus$3,225,000$3M)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,125,000$5,125,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,500,000$5,500,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
-$1,225,000-$1,225,000 (Performance Bonus$325,000$325K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,050,000$1,050,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$9,250,000$9,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,600,000$2,600,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$1,375,000$1,375,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,800,000$3,800,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$775,000$775,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:31 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 748
Likes: 813
Jackets decline. We arent retaining that amount on Peeke. We also have no interest in 2 rentals.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:33 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: BoomerTheHero
Jackets decline. We arent retaining that amount on Peeke. We also have no interest in 2 rentals.

Oilers have no interest in a cap dump defensemen that has no idea how to play defence
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:35 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Oilers aren’t trading the 2024 1st that’s just not realistic also they aren’t giving up Broberg to receive Bjugstad also not realistic at all
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:38 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 403
Likes: 521
Edited Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:44 p.m.
I think the Hawks don't even consider this deal, even with NOTHING going back to EDM. Taking on Campbell's and Ceci's contracts by themselves will cost a LOT more than a single 1st round pick. But with the Hawks adding Mrazek, Murphy, and Perry (with retention, no less!) to EDM's return, it'd take a LOT more in high picks and top prospects; likely, much more than the EDM would consider.
Snowhawk18 and Garak liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:50 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 834
AZ pass Bjug is on 56pt pace and only veteran C on the team. funny thing you had him end of last year didnt resign
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:51 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 748
Likes: 813
Quoting: Oilers_29
Oilers have no interest in a cap dump defensemen that has no idea how to play defence


lol ok
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:54 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: LivingAnew
I think the Hawks don't even consider this deal, even with NOTHING going back to EDM. Taking on Campbell's and Ceci's contracts by themselves will cost a LOT more than a single 1st round pick. But with the Hawks adding Mrazek, Murphy, and Perry (with retention, no less!) to EDM's return, it'd take a LOT more in high picks and top prospects; likely, much more than the EDM would consider.


I’m sorry but you have no idea what ur talking about about ceci isn’t a cap dump
Nov. 24, 2023 at 1:55 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 163
Likes: 79
The oilers didn’t pay for the dump of Campbell let alone everything the hawks are giving up as well. Not even close to the hawks accepting
Snowhawk18 and Garak liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 2:04 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 403
Likes: 521
Quoting: Oilers_29
I’m sorry but you have no idea what ur talking about about ceci isn’t a cap dump


Okay... Good luck!
Garak liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 2:10 p.m.
#10
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 3,376
Quoting: Oilers_29
I’m sorry but you have no idea what ur talking about about ceci isn’t a cap dump


Where did he say Ceci was a cap dump? You put words in someone’s mouth and then claim the person making statement has no idea what they are talking about, so in fact it is you who has no idea what you are talking about.
LivingAnew and Garak liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 2:29 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 403
Likes: 521
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Where did he say Ceci was a cap dump? You put words in someone’s mouth and then claim the person making statement has no idea what they are talking about, so in fact it is you who has no idea what you are talking about.


Thanks, Snowhawk. I didn't even want to get into it with him, so just let it go.... I liked your succinct response, tho!

Ceci might be a cap casualty vs a camp dump, but to the Hawks it's all about his AVV. They aren't in the "win now" business, so it's his cap hit that's most relevant to them, IMO... He's gonna be LONG GONE by the time the Hawks are relevant again.

Cheers
Snowhawk18 and Garak liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 2:32 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 768
Likes: 502
Quoting: bwhsocal
AZ pass Bjug is on 56pt pace and only veteran C on the team. funny thing you had him end of last year didnt resign


Agree with this. Value is good. I'd be tempted just because I still have hopes for Broberg and they need NHL-ready D, but they are even thinner at C right now with injuries.
Would strongly reconsider something like this closer to the deadline if/when they drop down the standings with the injuries, but they need what Bjugstad is bringing right now. They don't need to win this season, but they can't go back to being uncompetitive everynight.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 2:33 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Where did he say Ceci was a cap dump? You put words in someone’s mouth and then claim the person making statement has no idea what they are talking about, so in fact it is you who has no idea what you are talking about.


Idk if u can read or not but he said “taking on campbells and ceci contracts will cost a lot” that is pretty much insisting that ceci is a cap dump but ok man maybe try reading.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 2:49 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 834
Quoting: Pompadour_de_Armstrong
Agree with this. Value is good. I'd be tempted just because I still have hopes for Broberg and they need NHL-ready D, but they are even thinner at C right now with injuries.
Would strongly reconsider something like this closer to the deadline if/when they drop down the standings with the injuries, but they need what Bjugstad is bringing right now. They don't need to win this season, but they can't go back to being uncompetitive everynight.

unless AZ goes out and gets top 6 C, next year is 24yo hayton and mcbain and 20yo cooley in the middle still going to need bjug next year. geekie cant see as ready (20yo next year) and i dont see a top 6 C in prospect pool. I wouldnt mind GMBA kick around on CAL Lindholm he would be a solid top 6 C turning 29yo if could get on 5 yr deal.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 3:23 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 768
Likes: 502
Quoting: bwhsocal
unless AZ goes out and gets top 6 C, next year is 24yo hayton and mcbain and 20yo cooley in the middle still going to need bjug next year. geekie cant see as ready (20yo next year) and i dont see a top 6 C in prospect pool.


I'd be fine with Hayton, Cooley, McBain as the top three centers next year, to be honest. But doing it now while they are all banged up and trying to hold on to their position in the Central would be dumb.
They should be giving Jenik and Smith some time at center in the NHL while the injury bug is here, and see what they've got depthwise. Kerfoot and Boyd are emergency options for now, but neither is ideal. Things are so bad In the top six they tried Schmaltz at center again. Not a good time to trade Bjugstad. Closer to the deadline if they fold, I'd be happy to deal him for the right return.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 3:39 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 834
Quoting: Pompadour_de_Armstrong
I'd be fine with Hayton, Cooley, McBain as the top three centers next year, to be honest. But doing it now while they are all banged up and trying to hold on to their position in the Central would be dumb.
They should be giving Jenik and Smith some time at center in the NHL while the injury bug is here, and see what they've got depthwise. Kerfoot and Boyd are emergency options for now, but neither is ideal. Things are so bad In the top six they tried Schmaltz at center again. Not a good time to trade Bjugstad. Closer to the deadline if they fold, I'd be happy to deal him for the right return.


completely agree now now can trade any C. C is weakest position and in the pool is Geekie (not close to NHL ready) and jenik/smith (I dont see as top 6 C), for this trade bromberg is nice on the cusp D but we are not lacking in D prospects - kesselring, koly, soda, duda, szuber, mavrik and simashev - most wont be top 4 but someone should jump up.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 4:24 p.m.
#17
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 3,376
Quoting: Oilers_29
Idk if u can read or not but he said “taking on campbells and ceci contracts will cost a lot” that is pretty much insisting that ceci is a cap dump but ok man maybe try reading.


So then by your definition every trade is a cap dump because the acquiring team takes on a players contract.

I can read just fine, you on the other hand lack comprehension skills.
Garak and LivingAnew liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 4:55 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Edited Nov. 24, 2023 at 5:02 p.m.
Quoting: Snowhawk18
So then by your definition every trade is a cap dump because the acquiring team takes on a players contract.

I can read just fine, you on the other hand lack comprehension skills.

“So taking on campbell and ceci contract will cost a 1st”

Please tell me what that means please cause apparently I don’t know what that means and can’t comprehend maybe you can tell me
Nov. 24, 2023 at 4:59 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: Snowhawk18
So then by your definition every trade is a cap dump because the acquiring team takes on a players contract.

I can read just fine, you on the other hand lack comprehension skills.

Are you sure you can read just fine?
Nov. 24, 2023 at 5:24 p.m.
#20
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 3,376
Quoting: Oilers_29
“So taking on campbell and ceci contract will cost a 1st”

Please tell me what that means please cause apparently I don’t know what that means and can’t comprehend maybe you can tell me


It could mean the person who posted this believes that by adding Ceci it reduces the draft compensation required to be paid the Oilers to move Campbell’s contract.

So for example maybe the creator of this post believes it would cost a 1st and 2nd round pick to trade Campbell’s contract but if they add Ceci now only a 1st round pick is required. In this scenario that would mean Ceci has a 2nd round value and IS NOT a cap dump… understand? Read slow, you will figure it out.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 5:50 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Edited Nov. 24, 2023 at 5:55 p.m.
Quoting: Snowhawk18
It could mean the person who posted this believes that by adding Ceci it reduces the draft compensation required to be paid the Oilers to move Campbell’s contract.

So for example maybe the creator of this post believes it would cost a 1st and 2nd round pick to trade Campbell’s contract but if they add Ceci now only a 1st round pick is required. In this scenario that would mean Ceci has a 2nd round value and IS NOT a cap dump… understand? Read slow, you will figure it out.

Yeah you definitely don’t know how to read LMAO

“Taking on ceci and campbells contract will take a lot more than just a single 1st”

So the creator of this post is insisting that they are cap dumps and will cost more than just one first to take on both contracts glad we cleared this confusion or maybe you are still confused with those terrific Comprehension skills you have.

If he said for example “taking on campbells contract will cost a lot more than ceci and single 1st” then maybe it could mean exactly what you are saying but hey not everyone knows how to comprehend I guess
Nov. 24, 2023 at 6:23 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,814
Likes: 10,570
Edited Nov. 24, 2023 at 6:28 p.m.
Quoting: Snowhawk18
It could mean the person who posted this believes that by adding Ceci it reduces the draft compensation required to be paid the Oilers to move Campbell’s contract.

So for example maybe the creator of this post believes it would cost a 1st and 2nd round pick to trade Campbell’s contract but if they add Ceci now only a 1st round pick is required. In this scenario that would mean Ceci has a 2nd round value and IS NOT a cap dump… understand? Read slow, you will figure it out.


Quoting: Oilers_29
Yeah you definitely don’t know how to read LMAO

“Taking on ceci and campbells contract will take a lot more than just a single 1st”

So the creator of this post is insisting that they are cap dumps and will cost more than just one first to take on both contracts glad we cleared this confusion or maybe you are still confused with those terrific Comprehension skills you have.

If he said for example “taking on campbells contract will cost a lot more than ceci and single 1st” then maybe it could mean exactly what you are saying but hey not everyone knows how to comprehend I guess


I'm gonna go ahead and call a spade a spade here. Ceci is a cap dump, IMO. If EDM needs cap space to make moves work and he is the expendable one that no other team is paying for, he is a dump. He has no value to CHI. He is not a long term piece. We don't want him outside of being paid to take his salary. That is a dump. BUT if you can find another team to take him, go for it. This proposal still needs to pay for dumping Campbell AND all the pieces EDM is getting back. And that isn't even NEARLY enough to dump Campbell without all those pieces CHI is sending.
Oilers_29 liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 6:28 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2023
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 357
Quoting: Garak
I'm gonna go ahead and call a spade a spade here. Ceci is a cap dump. If EDM needs cap space to make moves work and he is the expendable one that no other team is paying for, he is a dump. He has no value to CHI. He is not a long term piece. We don't want him outside of being paid to take his salary. That is a dump. BUT if you can find another team to take him, go for it. This proposal still needs to pay for dumping Campbell AND all the pieces EDM is getting back. And that isn't even NEARLY enough to dump Campbell without all those pieces CHI is sending.


I don’t think he is a cap dump and is a solid top 4RD but I can u derstand why he would have no value to CHI
Garak liked this.
Nov. 24, 2023 at 6:34 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 10,814
Likes: 10,570
Quoting: Oilers_29
I don’t think he is a cap dump and is a solid top 4RD but I can u derstand why he would have no value to CHI


For sure. It has more to do with the fact that CHI is currently in the business of collecting draft capital, young players, and luck of the draw cap dumps. Dickinson, for example, he was going nowhere fast with VAN. They paid us to take on his salary. We had zero expectations for him and were just happy to get the picks and creating some roster space at LHD by moving Stillman. Low and behold Dickinson bounced back in a Hawks sweater and we are likely gonna get to double dip moving him at the TDL and getting more assets. And that is the kind of stuff KD is looking to do at this point in the rebuild. Although, anyones guess is as good as mine when the pivot away from those tactics is going to come and he starts paying for assets to build our roster up.
Oilers_29 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll