SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Yotes Are A Playoff Team

Created by: edeangel84
Team: 2023-24 Arizona Coyotes
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 18, 2023
Published: Dec. 18, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
These moves cost very little and make them better.
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. Brown, Joshua
  2. Smith, Nathan
  3. 2024 3rd round pick (ARI)
  4. 2025 4th round pick (ARI)
2.
SJS
  1. 2024 1st round pick (ARI)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the BOS
2025
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
2026
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the ARI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$73,404,167$0$3,582,500$10,095,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$7,150,000$7,150,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,850,000$5,850,000
RW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$3,425,000$3,425,000
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,775,000$1,775,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,599,999$1,599,999
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$886,667$886,667
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$2,725,000$2,725,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,700,000$1,700,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,950,000$1,950,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,100,000$1,100,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$800,000$800,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$8,250,000$8,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$7,857,143$7,857,143
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$1,750,000$1,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$5,291,667$5,291,667
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$800,000$800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Dec. 18, 2023 at 1:55 p.m.
#1
pens1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,955
Likes: 1,093
uhhh Why are the penguins including Broz in this?

Remove Broz and you have a deal.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 1:56 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: pens1991
uhhh Why are the penguins including Broz in this?

Remove Broz and you have a deal.


It is an extra incentive to take Rakell’s contract. Broz is nothing special.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:00 p.m.
#3
pens1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,955
Likes: 1,093
Quoting: edeangel84
It is an extra incentive to take Rakell’s contract. Broz is nothing special.


You literally have zero clue whether he'll be anything special or not. His career so far looks a bit similar to one Bryan Rust... i'd be okay keeping him around and seeing what you have given the fact the penguins have quite literally nothing in the cupboard.

Not to mention in this ACGM example the creator is acting as the yotes are going to playoffs, that means they're viewing Rakell as a piece to help, if they want to buy they aren't getting incentive to take Rakell's contract. Remove smith for "incentive".
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:00 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,541
Likes: 4,176
Yotes are a very good team. I would highly recommend they not take on Rakells contract though. He has 4 more years left on his contract AFTER this year.

They already have great forward depth.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:02 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: pens1991
You literally have zero clue whether he'll be anything special or not. His career so far looks a bit similar to one Bryan Rust... i'd be okay keeping him around and seeing what you have given the fact the penguins have quite literally nothing in the cupboard.

Not to mention in this ACGM example the creator is acting as the yotes are going to playoffs, that means they're viewing Rakell as a piece to help, if they want to buy they aren't getting incentive to take Rakell's contract. Remove smith for "incentive".


He’s 7th in scoring on his own college team. He is not projecting well. I doubt he will be a full time NHLer. We need cap space and it’s either Rakell or Rust who would go. I would much rather keep Rust and go for a better winger in the summer like Sam Rinehart.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:02 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,541
Likes: 4,176
Quoting: pens1991
You literally have zero clue whether he'll be anything special or not. His career so far looks a bit similar to one Bryan Rust... i'd be okay keeping him around and seeing what you have given the fact the penguins have quite literally nothing in the cupboard.

Not to mention in this ACGM example the creator is acting as the yotes are going to playoffs, that means they're viewing Rakell as a piece to help, if they want to buy they aren't getting incentive to take Rakell's contract. Remove smith for "incentive".


The Coyotes have a very good chance at making the playoffs. I had them in a playoff spot in my pre-season playoff predictions. They still have work to do, but it wouldn't be crazy if they made it.

They have made some sneaky good moves over the past 2 years.

But I don't think they should make this trade at all.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:02 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Yotes are a very good team. I would highly recommend they not take on Rakells contract though. He has 4 more years left on his contract AFTER this year.

They already have great forward depth.


He has a very easy contract to move or buyout. It’s not a big risk for them.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:05 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 569
Likes: 176
I would take this
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:05 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 9,541
Likes: 4,176
Quoting: edeangel84
He has a very easy contract to move or buyout. It’s not a big risk for them.


5m x 4 more years. He is owed 6m next year also. He is already 30 years old. Coyotes are already a cash strapped team.

It doesn't make sense at all in my mind.

I strongly believe it would cost Pittsburgh a 1st round pick to get off Rakells contract at the moment. They may as well keep him at this point and see if he can get back to the player he was last year. I would sell him the moment his value comes back to anything resembling neutral.
pens1991 liked this.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:15 p.m.
#10
pens1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,955
Likes: 1,093
Quoting: edeangel84
He’s 7th in scoring on his own college team. He is not projecting well. I doubt he will be a full time NHLer. We need cap space and it’s either Rakell or Rust who would go. I would much rather keep Rust and go for a better winger in the summer like Sam Rinehart.


Again, I'd much rather wait and see what he shows at a professional level and trust the pro scouts that drafted him in the 2nd round.

Bryan Rust won't get traded and I highly doubt that Rakell would be traded given his contract not to mention he has an 8 team NTC and lets be honest... AZ is most likely on that list. Now idk if he had to submit a list at the start of each season or start of contract (everyone's tend to be different) but pretty comfortable saying Chicago/Arizona/Philly/Columbus/San Jose are 5 of the 8 teams on that list.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:20 p.m.
#11
pens1991
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,955
Likes: 1,093
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
5m x 4 more years. He is owed 6m next year also. He is already 30 years old. Coyotes are already a cash strapped team.

It doesn't make sense at all in my mind.

I strongly believe it would cost Pittsburgh a 1st round pick to get off Rakells contract at the moment. They may as well keep him at this point and see if he can get back to the player he was last year. I would sell him the moment his value comes back to anything resembling neutral.


I don't think a 1st is the price to move him...

He had a cold start scoring wise to this season and then got hurt but was still playing very sound hockey. He also his second best season of his career in year one of the contract.

Completely agree with you on term/aav making things difficult to move, not sure what the market would look like for him if he comes back from injury and starts scoring again.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:25 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 184
Likes: 72
Edited Dec. 18, 2023 at 4:12 p.m.
Sharks should accept this. A 1st in the 14-20 range is too enticing.
edeangel84 liked this.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:27 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: pens1991
Again, I'd much rather wait and see what he shows at a professional level and trust the pro scouts that drafted him in the 2nd round.

Bryan Rust won't get traded and I highly doubt that Rakell would be traded given his contract not to mention he has an 8 team NTC and lets be honest... AZ is most likely on that list. Now idk if he had to submit a list at the start of each season or start of contract (everyone's tend to be different) but pretty comfortable saying Chicago/Arizona/Philly/Columbus/San Jose are 5 of the 8 teams on that list.


I have no clue what the kid will be but based on the evidence available to me at this point I don’t think he looks like a worthy 2nd rounder. He’s being out scored by guys who went in the 7th round. Regardless of Broz, Rakell is a good candidate for a trade. That 8 team No Trade list is submitted to the team and it is based on his wishes. He came from Anaheim and I’m guessing a return out west to a team on the rise isn’t that unattractive. I don’t think the players care nearly as much about the arena stuff as fans do. Even if they end up in Houston in 2-3 years that’s hardly a bad landing spot. He has a baby and will probably want to be somewhere long term. A young team on the rise whether in Arizona or Houston is not a bad fit. I can see him not wanting any Canadian teams or a SJ though.

Even if a deal took place in the summer, he’s a much more ideal trade candidate than Rust. For one Rust is the better player and he’s been a part of our cup teams. He’s very much at the top of that secondary tier of core Pens players. Rakell was the one good trade of the previous regime’s reign of terror but he isn’t someone I view as a key cog. I think we need to be aggressive for a top 6 winger in the offseason and he’s the guy I’d like to see move to clear more cap space.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:29 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
5m x 4 more years. He is owed 6m next year also. He is already 30 years old. Coyotes are already a cash strapped team.

It doesn't make sense at all in my mind.

I strongly believe it would cost Pittsburgh a 1st round pick to get off Rakells contract at the moment. They may as well keep him at this point and see if he can get back to the player he was last year. I would sell him the moment his value comes back to anything resembling neutral.


17 games of mediocre play doesn’t mean a cap dump. He’s going to have value to someone even if we don’t get much of anything back. You attach 1sts to move real garbage. Think of something like the Kassian dump.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:35 p.m.
#15
Sabres are elite
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,995
Likes: 3,305
I think the Yotes could make better additions to their team than those players. Rakell's contract length is too much and Ferraro is good but I think giving up their 2024 1st is a highly questionable move
Dec. 18, 2023 at 2:37 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,960
Likes: 1,181
Quoting: Skyraider112
I think the Yotes could make better additions to their team than those players. Rakell's contract length is too much and Ferraro is good but I think giving up their 2024 1st is a highly questionable move


They could make major additions if they wanted to part with really valuable futures but that’s a bad idea. You don’t win cups by trading major building blocks. These two trades are low risk trades.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 5:51 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 795
Likes: 300
Sharks do this. Also what the hell, does Arizona really have 10 2nd round picks in the next 3 years?
edeangel84 liked this.
Dec. 18, 2023 at 6:55 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 509
Likes: 202
Ferraro is not worth a 1st, change it to a 2nd (dealers choice) and it is a better deal.

Rakell is a decent player, but his contract is not worth the risk for what he brings, he is already in his decline. Broz, B- prospect is just that, something to have in the barn as a trade chip or maybe something worthwhile in the future but, meh. Honestly would rather keep Smith as a B- prospect that could become a depth center in a couple years. They are always valuable.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll