SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would Mtl do this

Created by: SlimTJ100
Team: 2023-24 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 3, 2024
Published: Jan. 3, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Figuring Mtl could use some leadership for a few years

Rangers intend on buying out Armia after the season. Gets RW depth for this year
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
2026
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$78,992,416$610,892$882,500$4,507,584
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New York Rangers
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$11,642,857$11,642,857
LW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,325,000$2,325,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$828,333$828,333 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$846,667$846,667
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$800,000$800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
UFA - 6
Logo of the New York Rangers
$5,666,667$5,666,667
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,872,000$3,872,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Rangers
$8,000,000$8,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$825,000$825,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New York Rangers
$787,500$787,500
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$4,437,500$4,437,500
C, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the New York Rangers
$812,500$812,500
LD
RFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 3 at 1:09 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 2,462
Likes: 1,597
I'm an outsider, but you'd have to add at least a 2nd to dump Goodrow's contract. The extra 2 years overlap with exactly when MTL will start to need that space, so it may just be completely untenable.
jpsnow13 liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:10 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 2,306
Unfortunately the organization values goodrow for whatever reason

Drury needs to man up, admit the signing was a mistake and buy-him out in the off-season. He already did it with Nemeth
Jan. 3 at 1:11 p.m.
#3
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,998
Likes: 1,454
Goodrow is a very good 4th liner, Armia is not an nhler.
Jan. 3 at 1:11 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 1,701
Ya just add 2 1st rounders and the habs will take it.

Goodrow is just as bad as armia but with 2 extra years.
Campabee liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:11 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: SupremeBone
I'm an outsider, but you'd have to add at least a 2nd to dump Goodrow's contract. The extra 2 years overlap with exactly when MTL will start to need that space, so it may just be completely untenable.


Quoting: SupremeBone
I'm an outsider, but you'd have to add at least a 2nd to dump Goodrow's contract. The extra 2 years overlap with exactly when MTL will start to need that space, so it may just be completely untenable.

Yea figured. Armias contract isn’t as bad of a buyout. I’d consider adding the pick tho
Jan. 3 at 1:12 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 1,701
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Goodrow is a very good 4th liner, Armia is not an nhler.


If armia isnt a nhler goodrow isnt either he has been worse than armia this year
Burnout and Campabee liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:13 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: Black61
Ya just add 2 1st rounders and the habs will take it.

Goodrow is just as bad as armia but with 2 extra years.


Alright let’s not get crazy. I’ll give you a better prospect and a second
Jan. 3 at 1:14 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: Black61
If armia isnt a nhler goodrow isnt either he has been worse than armia this year


Niether are very good. My idea is pay for a shorter and less penal of a buyout
Jan. 3 at 1:15 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 1,701
Quoting: SlimTJ100
Alright let’s not get crazy. I’ll give you a better prospect and a second


Not remotely close.

Goodrow has worse metrics than armia and is signed 2 years longer. He also has a worse buyout structure
jpsnow13 liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:16 p.m.
#10
LBS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 559
I think if MTL thought they could eat Goodrow extra 2 yrs, swapping in a 2nd rounder for Berard should be more than enough
Jan. 3 at 1:18 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 1,701
Quoting: SlimTJ100
Niether are very good. My idea is pay for a shorter and less penal of a buyout


The cost for adding two extra years at 3+ million on a bad buyout contract is 2 1sts
Campabee liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:22 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 1,015
Absolutely not.

Its not hard to find "leadership" in free agency for cheap if that's your only consideration and they don't even need that kind of leadership. Montreal has also been managing their cap with a view on the 2025 offseason, so this just hurts them. And as bad as Armia's contract is and has been and as flawed a player he is, based on this season I'd rather have him on the ice than Goodrow.

Montreal may be willing to make a swap, but If you think adding a Bedard or a 2nd (or even a late 1st) makes it worthwhile for Montreal then you're wrong.
Black61, jpsnow13 and Campabee liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:30 p.m.
#13
You know nothing JS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 7,055
Likes: 4,440
k
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Goodrow is a very good 4th liner, Armia is not an nhler.


Goodrow is a gritty blue collar guy. Armia is an irregular powerfoward.

If you took the time to look at their playoffs stats:

Armia: 10 goals/15 points in 44 games
Goodrow: 6 goals/16 points in 81 games

That's double the production. Let that sinks in.


So both teams would benefit from the new guy's style right now, but there is just no way MTL takes on Goodrow's last 2 years. Unless NY pays for a $7M dump.
Jan. 3 at 1:30 p.m.
#14
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: Black61
The cost for adding two extra years at 3+ million on a bad buyout contract is 2 1sts

Nah that’s too much then. Goodrow buyout is just longer, it’s not overly expensive
Jan. 3 at 1:36 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 1,701
Quoting: SlimTJ100
Nah that’s too much then. Goodrow buyout is just longer, it’s not overly expensive


Its longer and more cap when the habs need it.

The habs arent likely buying out armia he will be in laval next year. Years 2-6 is when they need cap and goodrows buyout is over 3 million in year 3 alone.

Arizona got more than a 1st in value for taking on kassian with 2 years left . Goodrow costs much more for the extra year
Jan. 3 at 1:38 p.m.
#16
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: Black61
Its longer and more cap when the habs need it.

The habs arent likely buying out armia he will be in laval next year. Years 2-6 is when they need cap and goodrows buyout is over 3 million in year 3 alone.

Arizona got more than a 1st in value for taking on kassian with 2 years left . Goodrow costs much more for the extra year

I gotcha. I was just throwing it out there. I get what you all are saying. Rangers are screwed 😂
Jan. 3 at 1:44 p.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,556
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: SlimTJ100
I gotcha. I was just throwing it out there. I get what you all are saying. Rangers are screwed 😂


Frankly, if you switched Armia with a higher cap hit like Dvorak and added a player like Chytil or the Rags 2024 1st, I could see the Habs doing that
Jan. 3 at 1:45 p.m.
#18
SlafDaddy
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 451
Likes: 187
I think it just makes more sense to buy out Armia this summer.
Jan. 3 at 1:46 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: Campabee
Frankly, if you switched Armia with a higher cap hit like Dvorak and added a player like Chytil or the Rags 2024 1st, I could see the Habs doing that

Well fil is hurt so I doubt they would. He legit may never play again. I think the max I would do is Berard and a first rder. I’d definitely attach a first to dump goodrow on someone, but not two and a great prospect
Jan. 3 at 1:47 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: Big_Papa20
I think it just makes more sense to buy out Armia this summer.


That’s fair. I think the Rangers could use Armia this year tho which is part of the reason I asked for him, and then buy him out
Big_Papa20 liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:50 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,556
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: SlimTJ100
Well fil is hurt so I doubt they would. He legit may never play again. I think the max I would do is Berard and a first rder. I’d definitely attach a first to dump goodrow on someone, but not two and a great prospect


That sucks about Chytil

I never said 2 1sts and a great prospect, I suggested one 1st + Goodrow for Dvorak
Jan. 3 at 1:56 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Quoting: Campabee
That sucks about Chytil

I never said 2 1sts and a great prospect, I suggested one 1st + Goodrow for Dvorak
I know…someone else did lol it’s turning into a long thread

I’ll have to look at Dvorak… That may actually make more sense for the rangers anyway
Campabee liked this.
Jan. 3 at 1:57 p.m.
#23
Mr.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 1,253
You're not serious, are you ?!?!
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Jan. 3 at 2:00 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
Milolaborino
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 317
Edited Jan. 3 at 2:15 p.m.
Quoting: SMH
You're not serious, are you ?!?!


It was just an idea, calm yourself Cranjis McBasketball

Smh 🤦
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll