SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Does this get it done

Created by: Kevo
Team: 2023-24 Winnipeg Jets
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 21, 2024
Published: Jan. 21, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MTL
  1. Kupari, Rasmus
  2. 2024 2nd round pick (MTL)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2025
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
2026
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the WPG
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$81,717,858$0$865,000$1,782,142
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$7,142,857$7,142,857
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,125,000$6,125,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,437,500$3,437,500
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,985,000$1,985,000 (Performance Bonus$15,000$15K)
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$2,166,667$2,166,667
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$6,166,667$6,166,667
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$3,900,000$3,900,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,875,000$5,875,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,750,000$1,750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$5,950,000$5,950,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$775,000$775,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Winnipeg Jets
$775,000$775,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 21 at 1:01 p.m.
#1
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 466
No thanks!!
Joblow liked this.
Jan. 21 at 1:11 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,816
Likes: 7,032
Winnipeg says no. Far too much for an unneeded player in Monahan.
Jonesy204 and WheEhlers liked this.
Jan. 21 at 1:36 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,933
Likes: 3,256
When the extremists are done screaming from the opposing rooftops about too much or too little etc etc, it's realistic. I've been saying all along he's a late 1st or 2nd + prospect, the reports have been aligned with that as well. Imo this would cover it (unless there becomes a bidding war) without retention, add more for using the retention slot. Seems a little too poetic with it being MTL's 2nd. I also don't think it's a trade that happens until the TDL unless it's a huge offer (ie: a 1st + prospect/2nd/more/etc) since what you've proposed would honestly be around the minimum required.
Jay27 liked this.
Jan. 21 at 1:55 p.m.
#4
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,091
I had high hopes for Kupari since he was drafted, but he's been unremarkable and I haven't seen anything to suggest that will change.
That said, I would still be willing to give him a chance as a reclamation. It's close enough to consider at least.
Our regular Jets fans will not appreciate the cost of the 2nd to upgrade from Kupari to Monahan, but it's not at all unreasonable.
Jan. 21 at 2:03 p.m.
#5
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 1,142
No thanks, Jets will keep Kupari and the pick
Jonesy204 liked this.
Jan. 21 at 2:07 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Kevo
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 335
Likes: 42
Quoting: ricochetii
I had high hopes for Kupari since he was drafted, but he's been unremarkable and I haven't seen anything to suggest that will change.
That said, I would still be willing to give him a chance as a reclamation. It's close enough to consider at least.
Our regular Jets fans will not appreciate the cost of the 2nd to upgrade from Kupari to Monahan, but it's not at all unreasonable.
I know this isn’t what Kupari was supposed to be but like he could be a perfect 4th liner for a line time
ricochetii liked this.
Jan. 21 at 2:14 p.m.
#7
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,091
Quoting: Kevo
I know this isn’t what Kupari was supposed to be but like he could be a perfect 4th liner for a line time


I don't see it. If anything he'd be more likely as a tertiary scorer on a sheltered 3rd line. He's unimpressive defensively so any hope of him rebounding to establish himself as an NHLer lies in his ability to outproduce his matchups consistently, which is going to require being deployed offensively against weaker competition.
Jan. 21 at 2:54 p.m.
#8
Pitter Patter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 182
Likes: 70
Quoting: ricochetii
I don't see it. If anything he'd be more likely as a tertiary scorer on a sheltered 3rd line. He's unimpressive defensively so any hope of him rebounding to establish himself as an NHLer lies in his ability to outproduce his matchups consistently, which is going to require being deployed offensively against weaker competition.


This is ill-informed. Rasmus is quite adept defensively and has been unlucky around the net this year. He will never be a big point producer but he is solid on pk and can play all positions up and down the lineup with speed. Add 3 years of RFA control and I don't even give you Kupari for Monahan straight up let alone adding a top 40 pick.
Windjammer and WheEhlers liked this.
Jan. 21 at 2:57 p.m.
#9
Pitter Patter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 182
Likes: 70
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
When the extremists are done screaming from the opposing rooftops about too much or too little etc etc, it's realistic. I've been saying all along he's a late 1st or 2nd + prospect, the reports have been aligned with that as well. Imo this would cover it (unless there becomes a bidding war) without retention, add more for using the retention slot. Seems a little too poetic with it being MTL's 2nd. I also don't think it's a trade that happens until the TDL unless it's a huge offer (ie: a 1st + prospect/2nd/more/etc) since what you've proposed would honestly be around the minimum required.


I feel like the return for Monahan will be disappointing for Habs fans.
WheEhlers liked this.
Jan. 21 at 3:13 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Kevo
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 335
Likes: 42
Quoting: Jonesy204
This is ill-informed. Rasmus is quite adept defensively and has been unlucky around the net this year. He will never be a big point producer but he is solid on pk and can play all positions up and down the lineup with speed. Add 3 years of RFA control and I don't even give you Kupari for Monahan straight up let alone adding a top 40 pick.
that’s a wild take man Kupari doesn’t even have a goal, I think he will be a great 4th liner just not for the jets. Monahan would also most likely resign with the jets and be a great linemate with lambert next year
Just_A_Guess liked this.
Jan. 21 at 3:40 p.m.
#11
Go Habs Go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 10,667
Likes: 4,091
Quoting: Jonesy204
This is ill-informed. Rasmus is quite adept defensively and has been unlucky around the net this year. He will never be a big point producer but he is solid on pk and can play all positions up and down the lineup with speed. Add 3 years of RFA control and I don't even give you Kupari for Monahan straight up let alone adding a top 40 pick.


I wouldn't say adept. He's got it pretty easy for a 4th liner considering he's playing limited minutes without heavy defensive deployment, yet still has negative differentials.

Like I said, I expected him to be more, it simply hasn't happened yet. I don't particularly want him, but I'd give him a chance to play to his strengths just in case there's still something there.
Just_A_Guess liked this.
Jan. 21 at 4:54 p.m.
#12
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
When the extremists are done screaming from the opposing rooftops about too much or too little etc etc, it's realistic. I've been saying all along he's a late 1st or 2nd + prospect, the reports have been aligned with that as well. Imo this would cover it (unless there becomes a bidding war) without retention, add more for using the retention slot. Seems a little too poetic with it being MTL's 2nd. I also don't think it's a trade that happens until the TDL unless it's a huge offer (ie: a 1st + prospect/2nd/more/etc) since what you've proposed would honestly be around the minimum required.


I think the most realistic trade comp out there is Andrew Copp. Almost identical offence (Monahan has a better pace), Monahan has better defensive analytics and he has a better history of putting more than 40 pts
Just_A_Guess liked this.
Jan. 21 at 5:52 p.m.
#13
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
I think the most realistic trade comp out there is Andrew Copp. Almost identical offence (Monahan has a better pace), Monahan has better defensive analytics and he has a better history of putting more than 40 pts


What? Lol. Copps defence is miles ahead of Monahan’s and Copp has a much better and overall rounded game. Monahan is good at faceoffs and is a essentially a power play specialist. He’s a poor skater and is not good 5v5 or defensively.
I think you guys will get a valuable piece for Monahan as GMs kind of go blind come TDL, but I think that you should temper your expectations thinking Montreal would get a Copp type return.
Jan. 21 at 5:57 p.m.
#14
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: jgimp69
What? Lol. Copps defence is miles ahead of Monahan’s and Copp has a much better and overall rounded game. Monahan is good at faceoffs and is a essentially a power play specialist. He’s a poor skater and is not good 5v5 or defensively.
I think you guys will get a valuable piece for Monahan as GMs kind of go blind come TDL, but I think that you should temper your expectations thinking Montreal would get a Copp type return.


According to JFresh hockey, Monahan’s defence was way better than Copp’s. Copp was actually quite awful analytically. Monahan also has more pts on 5v5 than on pp. He hasn’t scored a pp goal in a long time. On top of that, he plays with ****ty linemates
Just_A_Guess liked this.
Jan. 21 at 6:05 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 4,933
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
I think the most realistic trade comp out there is Andrew Copp. Almost identical offence (Monahan has a better pace), Monahan has better defensive analytics and he has a better history of putting more than 40 pts


I'm not opposed to holding out for a haul, just maintaining a mid-line of what I would look to pay to acquire a player like that if we were buying.
Jan. 21 at 6:22 p.m.
#16
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
According to JFresh hockey, Monahan’s defence was way better than Copp’s. Copp was actually quite awful analytically. Monahan also has more pts on 5v5 than on pp. He hasn’t scored a pp goal in a long time. On top of that, he plays with ****ty linemates


Way better? Come on! Seriously? Plus, if using JFresh, let’s use all the metrics then and not ignore all the other negative metrics then eh? There’s a lot of ****ty red all over Monahan’s card while Copps card looks quite respectable actually, lots of nice blue.
Monahan is a nice complimentary player, but he would have a very limited role on a contender. Would a GM overpay for him? Sure, it’s TDL mania and GMs get stupid. Hell, Montreal got a haul for a terrible D in Chiarot. Anything’s possible, but those deals are the rarity rather than the norm.
Windjammer liked this.
Jan. 21 at 6:43 p.m.
#17
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: jgimp69
Way better? Come on! Seriously? Plus, if using JFresh, let’s use all the metrics then and not ignore all the other negative metrics then eh? There’s a lot of ****ty red all over Monahan’s card while Copps card looks quite respectable actually, lots of nice blue.
Monahan is a nice complimentary player, but he would have a very limited role on a contender. Would a GM overpay for him? Sure, it’s TDL mania and GMs get stupid. Hell, Montreal got a haul for a terrible D in Chiarot. Anything’s possible, but those deals are the rarity rather than the norm.


40% more defense is huge. Yes, monahan has bad stats, but Copp ain’t really that much better. We also can’t ignore that the card was made after the season, and his offence stats are inflated by a lot cuz of his 18 pts in 16 games with New York
Jan. 21 at 7:13 p.m.
#18
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
40% more defense is huge. Yes, monahan has bad stats, but Copp ain’t really that much better. We also can’t ignore that the card was made after the season, and his offence stats are inflated by a lot cuz of his 18 pts in 16 games with New York


Cherry picking stats doesn’t increase Monahan’s trade value and valuing Monahan’s trade value that of Copps is just a bad take. 2 completely different players with Copp having better overall adavanced stats as well as better defensive and overall play. I’m looking at the player cards side by side and Copp is well and above better than Monahan, both by metrics and the eye test.
Windjammer liked this.
Jan. 21 at 7:28 p.m.
#19
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: jgimp69
Cherry picking stats doesn’t increase Monahan’s trade value and valuing Monahan’s trade value that of Copps is just a bad take. 2 completely different players with Copp having better overall adavanced stats as well as better defensive and overall play. I’m looking at the player cards side by side and Copp is well and above better than Monahan, both by metrics and the eye test.


I’m looking at both player side by side and I see than Monahan has a higher pts pace despite playing with bottom six players, that he has better 5v5 defensive stats by quite a lot, even if Copp’s stats are inflated. Also, Copp never hitted 40 pts before.

Copp is a pk specialist that is awful defensively at 5v5. A Copp return is right what Monahan should get
Jan. 21 at 7:37 p.m.
#20
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
I’m looking at both player side by side and I see than Monahan has a higher pts pace despite playing with bottom six players, that he has better 5v5 defensive stats by quite a lot, even if Copp’s stats are inflated. Also, Copp never hitted 40 pts before.

Copp is a pk specialist that is awful defensively at 5v5. A Copp return is right what Monahan should get


Monahan, WAR 13%(Copp63%) , ev DEF 55%(Copp52%) ev OFF 36%(Copp77%), PP 63%(Copp77%), PK 43%(Copp100%), G/60 16%(Copp47%)
Directly from JFresh
Keep beating this dead horse
Windjammer liked this.
Jan. 21 at 8:04 p.m.
#21
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: jgimp69
Monahan, WAR 13%(Copp63%) , ev DEF 55%(Copp52%) ev OFF 36%(Copp77%), PP 63%(Copp77%), PK 43%(Copp100%), G/60 16%(Copp47%)
Directly from JFresh
Keep beating this dead horse


You’ve got the wrong Copp card my friend

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1505980327910588420

WAR : 44 (13) - greatly inflated by 18 in 16
Evd : 17 (55)
Evo : 81 (36) - greatly inflated by 18 in 16
Rest is pretty much the same you said
Jan. 21 at 8:28 p.m.
#22
Jet69
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
You’ve got the wrong Copp card my friend

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1505980327910588420

WAR : 44 (13) - greatly inflated by 18 in 16
Evd : 17 (55)
Evo : 81 (36) - greatly inflated by 18 in 16
Rest is pretty much the same you said


Yours predates the one I’m using my friend. March 21/22 vs July 13/22.
If there are JFresh cards for each player this current year, I would love to see them.
Jan. 22 at 7:27 a.m.
#23
Prime Primeau
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2023
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 2,169
Quoting: jgimp69
Yours predates the one I’m using my friend. March 21/22 vs July 13/22.
If there are JFresh cards for each player this current year, I would love to see them.

I’m taking the one about the year he was traded, cuz it’s that year we are comparing him to Monahan this year
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll