Why is the cost of offloading Goodrow the same as offloading Campbell?

Orrrrrrr rangers save their assets and buy goodrow out

Drury laughs and says NOPE.

Because he misfired on Soup. Nobody is taking Soup's contract for just a 1st, would likely take (2) 1sts or a 1st and very good prospect

Is there any precedent for that being the cost? Monahan cost the Flames a first to get rid of, but he had a higher cap hit on a flat cap coming off hip surgery, and that first had a ton of conditions on it.

Duration of the remaining cap hit (3 plus this year) and the fact that Soup isn't even playing in the NHL anymore. Monahan had only 1 year remaining on his deal and still is a NHL player was just overpaid

Tanev and maybe Lafferty are the only UFA's from your signings the Hawks might target. No way do they sign Zadorov or 3 new bottom 6 forwards. As for your trades, a single 1st doesn't move Campbell. Especially w/ Mrazak now signed for 2 more years. Oilers add. Rangers won't spend a 1st to move Goodrow. They decline that trade. And Hawks wouldn't trade a late 1st for two 2nd's. They'd be much more likely to do the opposite - trade two of their 2nd's for a 1st.