SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Calgary sells it all

Created by: neo115joe
Team: 2023-24 New Jersey Devils
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 24, 2024
Published: Feb. 24, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
Buyouts
Recapture Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NSH
2025
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
2026
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NJD
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$83,500,000$66,430,000$422,500$5,482,500$17,070,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$3,150,000$3,150,000
C, LW
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
UFA - 7
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$8,800,000$8,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 8
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$775,000$775,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$2,125,000$2,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,500,000$4,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,050,000$1,050,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$850,833$850,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$925,000$925K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$762,500$762,500
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$9,000,000$9,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD/RD, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,400,000$1,400,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$800,000$800,000
RD
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 24 at 6:21 p.m.
#1
Speak of the Devil
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 23,940
Likes: 26,437
This is a very short-sighted trade
neo115joe liked this.
Feb. 24 at 6:21 p.m.
#2
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 6,871
Likes: 1,870
This would be of no interest or help to the Flames
Savebyryder and MoxNix liked this.
Feb. 24 at 6:26 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2023
Posts: 1
Likes: 2
Terrible trade for Calgary
KingofRnR and MoxNix liked this.
Feb. 24 at 6:27 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2022
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 1,208
Bad trade for both sides - Looks too much.
Feb. 24 at 6:30 p.m.
#5
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
laugh Noah Hanifin+Jacob Markstrom 2 x ($1,500,000 retained)+ Christopher Tanev and yet not a single 1st round pick going back to Calgary. Yeah Craig Conroy laugh and blocks Fitzgeralds number.

The trade is a joke anyways As Calgary doesn't need 2 Goaltenders going back to them.
MoxNix liked this.
Feb. 24 at 6:30 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,728
Likes: 19,804
Both teams decline this. Calgary because the value coming back doesn't match their needs at all, and Jersey because while they fix goaltending they trade 2 cost controlled defensemen with term for 2 expiring defensemen that at least 1 will want a big raise
Feb. 24 at 6:31 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Crazyjoe80
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 194
Likes: 6
Quoting: Devil
This is a very short-sighted trade


Not if we get hanifin and tanev to sign long term. Toffoli/Miller/Smith/Nosek all can walk. $8mil in cap space. Sell them on multiple cups 6,500,000 mil a season for Mercer, tanev, and hanifin
Feb. 24 at 6:33 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Crazyjoe80
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 194
Likes: 6
Quoting: MoSeider53
laugh Noah Hanifin+Jacob Markstrom 2 x ($1,500,000 retained)+ Christopher Tanev and yet not a single 1st round pick going back to Calgary. Yeah Craig Conroy laugh and blocks Fitzgeralds number.


After this season is over ain't nobody signing long term with Calgary everybody wants out. All players have term in there contracts hell I'd even throw in haula
Feb. 24 at 6:37 p.m.
#9
Future Norris guy
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 8,625
Quoting: neo115joe
Not if we get hanifin and tanev to sign long term. Toffoli/Miller/Smith/Nosek all can walk. $8mil in cap space. Sell them on multiple cups 6,500,000 mil a season for Mercer, tanev, and hanifin


Craig Conroy isn't retaining on Jacob Markstrom for 2 years.

So you're adding Jacob Markstrom at 2.25 years at $6,000,000. per
Noah Hanifin at 8 years $7,500,000
Chrisopher Tanev at 3 years $3,500,000

So you're basically adding $17,000,000 combined for all 3 players, yeah good luck to that. And not even offering a single 1st round pick. And no deal for all 3 players without Alexander Holtz going back the other way.
Feb. 24 at 6:39 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 230
Likes: 41
NJ gets the 3 best players and Calgary gets junk junk junk and cap dumps no thanks
Feb. 24 at 6:56 p.m.
#11
AdamL188
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 294
Likes: 65
A realistic return for this is Holtz, 2nd and Vanacek for Markstrom, 1st for Tanev, Casey+2nd for Hanafin
In total: 1st,2nd,3rd,Vanacek,Casey,Holtz
(At bare minimum)
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Feb. 24 at 7:00 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,891
Likes: 18,616
I think Calgary has been patient…and it’s looking like it is a sellers market on dmen. If the expectations are roughly…

Markstrom = Holtz
Hanifin = 1st+prospect
Tanev = 2nd+prospect
$1.5m x 2.2 = 3rd

We would probably be taking about something like:

One of - Holtz
One of - Casey, Gritsyuk
One of - Bahl, Clarke, Filmon, Hämeenaho
One of - 2024 1st, 2025 1st (some protection)
One of - 2025 2nd
One of - 2024 3rd, 2025 3rd

And possibly another piece to get over finish line. Maybe including both 1sts instead of 2nd.

Something like…Holtz, Casey, Bahl, 1st, 1st, 3rd

That’s a big ticket, especially if dmen don’t extend.
Dubcity liked this.
Feb. 24 at 7:02 p.m.
#13
Fire J.D. too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 913
Just brutal for the flames here...

I see what your trying to do but man your trade value and pieces included are just not the right ones.
Feb. 24 at 7:04 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,891
Likes: 18,616
Quoting: Dubcity
NJ gets the 3 best players and Calgary gets junk junk junk and cap dumps no thanks


Siegenthaler and Marino aren’t junk. Two solid defensive dmen on good contracts. But this is not an offer a rebuilding team probably opts for.
neo115joe liked this.
Feb. 24 at 7:09 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 230
Likes: 41
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Siegenthaler and Marino aren’t junk. Two solid defensive dmen on good contracts. But this is not an offer a rebuilding team probably opts for.


Sure call Marino and Siegenthaler the cap dumps then if you wish. They may be decent players but used in this application they are included for clearing cap for coming years. Cap dumps
Feb. 24 at 7:12 p.m.
#16
AdamL188
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 294
Likes: 65
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I think Calgary has been patient…and it’s looking like it is a sellers market on dmen. If the expectations are roughly…

Markstrom = Holtz
Hanifin = 1st+prospect
Tanev = 2nd+prospect
$1.5m x 2.2 = 3rd

We would probably be taking about something like:

One of - Holtz
One of - Casey, Gritsyuk
One of - Bahl, Clarke, Filmon, Hämeenaho
One of - 2024 1st, 2025 1st (some protection)
One of - 2025 2nd
One of - 2024 3rd, 2025 3rd

And possibly another piece to get over finish line. Maybe including both 1sts instead of 2nd.

Something like…Holtz, Casey, Bahl, 1st, 1st, 3rd

That’s a big ticket, especially if dmen don’t extend.


thats a rly good analysis, I'd assume Hanafin comes with an extenion (or the possibility of one at minimum), also Vanacek would be pretty much forced to be part of the trade for money reasons
neo115joe and NHLfan10506 liked this.
Feb. 24 at 7:18 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
Crazyjoe80
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2021
Posts: 194
Likes: 6
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Siegenthaler and Marino aren’t junk. Two solid defensive dmen on good contracts. But this is not an offer a rebuilding team probably opts for.


On great contracts, no dman of their quality under 5 mil a season anymore which ups there value, and is perfect for a rebuilding team. The only cap dump is vanecek
NHLfan10506 liked this.
Feb. 24 at 7:21 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,891
Likes: 18,616
Quoting: Dubcity
Sure call Marino and Siegenthaler the cap dumps then if you wish. They may be decent players but used in this application they are included for clearing cap for coming years. Cap dumps


It doesn’t work that way through. A rebuilding Calgary team probably doesn’t ask for them, but they have a ton of value. And I agree that the ask will be different pieces.
Feb. 24 at 7:24 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 40,891
Likes: 18,616
Quoting: AdamL188
thats a rly good analysis, I'd assume Hanafin comes with an extenion (or the possibility of one at minimum), also Vanacek would be pretty much forced to be part of the trade for money reasons


If Calgary doesn’t want Vanecek, I think NJD could keep him and try to build him back…even if he becomes expensive depth piece for us next year. He is on IR now. The real cap crunch comes in two years, after he has expired and in last year of Markstrom’s deal, when Mercer and Luke likely have new deals.
Feb. 24 at 7:28 p.m.
#20
AdamL188
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 294
Likes: 65
Quoting: NHLfan10506
If Calgary doesn’t want Vanecek, I think NJD could keep him and try to build him back…even if he becomes expensive depth piece for us next year. He is on IR now. The real cap crunch comes in two years, after he has expired and in last year of Markstrom’s deal, when Mercer and Luke likely have new deals.


you'd have to move him or Palat (who has an NMC) or maybe Halua (also has NTC) unless Meier was part of the trade instead of some other piece or 2
Feb. 24 at 7:32 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 3,256
Quoting: MoSeider53
Craig Conroy isn't retaining on Jacob Markstrom for 2 years.

So you're adding Jacob Markstrom at 2.25 years at $6,000,000. per
Noah Hanifin at 8 years $7,500,000
Chrisopher Tanev at 3 years $3,500,000

So you're basically adding $17,000,000 combined for all 3 players, yeah good luck to that. And not even offering a single 1st round pick. And no deal for all 3 players without Alexander Holtz going back the other way.


Not Holtz, Mercer. Nemec would be preferable but NJ GM would have to be crazy to trade him unless maybe if Andersson was in the deal too but not likely even then.
MoSeider53 liked this.
Feb. 24 at 7:57 p.m.
#22
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2023
Posts: 12,287
Likes: 3,271
Quoting: MoxNix
Not Holtz, Mercer. Nemec would be preferable but NJ GM would have to be crazy to trade him unless maybe if Andersson was in the deal too but not likely even then.


Deluded yourself all the way up to Nemec lol. Give it a week and you’ll be convince Jack Hughes is in the package
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll