SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Petey

Created by: Christian17
Team: 2023-24 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 27, 2024
Published: Feb. 27, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
If VAN can’t sign Pettersson by the draft I see them trading him and the asset comparables are Eichel, Meier, and Tkachuk.
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. Kakko, Kaapo
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NYR)
  3. 2025 5th round pick (NYR)
NYR
  1. Henrique, Adam ($2,912,500 retained)
  2. Vatrano, Frank ($1,825,000 retained)
2.
ANA
  1. 2024 5th round pick (EDM)
  2. 2024 6th round pick (NSH)
3.
ANA
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
4.
ANA
  1. Guentzel, Jake ($3,000,000 retained)
PIT
5.
ANA
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. 2025 1st round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
Ducks are in a position where they can just buy out Campbell since they’re not pinching pennies in win now mode
EDM
  1. Guentzel, Jake ($1,500,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Ducks are a middle man in three way between PIT and EDM. In this scenario EDM probably loses two firsts Broberg, Foegele + to get Guentzal and have enough cap to re-sign him by offloading the Campbell contract in full. A 1st in 2025 top 10 protected is probably the lowest price they could have without taking back salary
6.
VAN
  1. Jones, Max
  2. LaCombe, Jackson
  3. McTavish, Mason
  4. 2024 1st round pick (NYR)
  5. 2025 1st round pick (ANA)
Additional Details:
The Anaheim pick is top 5 protected

This trade would happen at the draft.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
2025
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2026
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$76,875,834$0$3,962,500$6,624,166
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$7,350,000$7,350,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,250,000$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo of the New York Rangers
$2,100,000$2,100,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$925,000$925,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$775,000$775,000
RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$896,667$896,667 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$550,000$550K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$812,500$812,500
G
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$844,167$844,167 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW
UFA - 3

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Feb. 27 at 6:40 p.m.
#26
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 472
Likes: 72
Quoting: Jah1722
The ducks actually aren’t in a spot to take on Campbell in this scenario. EP will need a big extension in the offseason and then all of the kids will need raises in 2-3 years too. They will be tight to the cap and the Campbell dead money could be a hindrance.


1.5M for 6 seasons ain’t that bad with the cap going up as much as it will. Having a first in 2025 would be worth more asset-wise than 6 years of 1.5M
Feb. 27 at 6:56 p.m.
#27
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 472
Likes: 72
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Here's why I think ANA shouldn't do a deal like this... McTavish. This team has a bevy of young developing players, so slated to be top NHL talent.

To me what happens here is you get Pettersson to accelerate the rebuild and you in essence almost waste some years of him being here because you're still waiting on everyone else to develop, so then you have to go out and start spending money you don't need to surround them with more vets.

Ducks should stay the course.


At some point you have to make a big move. Disgruntled superstars don’t come on the market too often. They already have their set future roster in

Gauthier-Z-Terry
McT-Leo-top 5 2024 pick
Killorn-Lundy-Strome

Fowler-Gudas
Mintyukov-Luneau
Zel-Lindstrom/Vaks/Helleson/FA

They have an abundance of assets but not all of em are gonna be able to make the roster so they need to package some of em together for a game changer, this is the type of trade they need to make.
Feb. 27 at 7:01 p.m.
#28
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,958
Likes: 1,446
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
LOLOLOL Isn't much more than a productive Kakko? What a weird comment to make. Like hey, player A isn't anything more than player B other than the fact he actually scores. Who wants that? No Rangers fans apparently. Who needs players who score?!? LOL

Do you realize how silly that sounds? Vatrano has 26 goals with around what, 30 games to go? Kakko doesn't even have 26 points LOL. Get outta here lol


Zero chance we give away Kakko's career for Vat, zero. He's very solid and will improve. Vat is getting good minutes, but like you said we saw him, he's Grabner 2.0.
Feb. 27 at 7:19 p.m.
#29
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 406
Likes: 176
Quoting: Christian17
I doubt it. Drury runs the risk of Kakko going the way of Puljujarvi with a real shot at a Cup this year. I think they take this deal running the risk of Kakko figuring it out on another team.


You have no idea what you're talking about.
Feb. 27 at 7:23 p.m.
#30
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Zero chance we give away Kakko's career for Vat, zero. He's very solid and will improve. Vat is getting good minutes, but like you said we saw him, he's Grabner 2.0.


The Rangers are in a win-now mode. Now, I'm not comparing you to the Pens, but Arty and Kreider are 32. They're not old, but the clock is ticking. Mika and Trocheck are 30. The time is now. You have the defense, the goaltending and Arty is having a crazy year, but your depth is an issue and will catch up with you in the playoffs. It's why a lot of good teams fall short in the playoffs. Adding Vatrano and Henrique, at least to me, probably make you guys the favorite in the East.

There's absolutely no guarantee Kakko's production will improve, none. Yes, he's excellent defensively, but the league is full of good defensive forwards who don't produce. We had ZAR. He some of the top defensive metrics of forwards in the league for a couple of years, but dude couldn't hit an open net if he was standing right in front of it.

Your time is NOW and shouldn't be hindered by waiting out one player.
Feb. 27 at 7:23 p.m.
#31
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Cornbreadnhl
You have no idea what you're talking about.


So this is just what you say to people you disagree with? He's got a completely valid point.
Christian17 liked this.
Feb. 27 at 7:30 p.m.
#32
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Christian17
I doubt it. Drury runs the risk of Kakko going the way of Puljujarvi with a real shot at a Cup this year. I think they take this deal running the risk of Kakko figuring it out on another team.


Agreed and Puljujarvi is a very good example. Even when looking at his season-by-season stats he also has a recent blip of 36 points in 65 games, but could never really put it all together.
Christian17 liked this.
Feb. 27 at 7:32 p.m.
#33
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 406
Likes: 176
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
So this is just what you say to people you disagree with? He's got a completely valid point.


I tell the truth, you should try it sometime. He has no clue, much like you.
Feb. 27 at 7:34 p.m.
#34
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Cornbreadnhl
I tell the truth, you should try it sometime. He has no clue, much like you.


You literally say nothing of weight. You just spout stuff off without any real substance behind it. Clearly you don't know anything about Puljujarvi. There are many parallels with him and Kakko.
Christian17 liked this.
Feb. 27 at 7:41 p.m.
#35
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Cornbreadnhl
You're opinion and it is meaningless.


Compelling argument.
Feb. 27 at 7:57 p.m.
#36
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,958
Likes: 1,446
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
The Rangers are in a win-now mode. Now, I'm not comparing you to the Pens, but Arty and Kreider are 32. They're not old, but the clock is ticking. Mika and Trocheck are 30. The time is now. You have the defense, the goaltending and Arty is having a crazy year, but your depth is an issue and will catch up with you in the playoffs. It's why a lot of good teams fall short in the playoffs. Adding Vatrano and Henrique, at least to me, probably make you guys the favorite in the East.

There's absolutely no guarantee Kakko's production will improve, none. Yes, he's excellent defensively, but the league is full of good defensive forwards who don't produce. We had ZAR. He some of the top defensive metrics of forwards in the league for a couple of years, but dude couldn't hit an open net if he was standing right in front of it.

Your time is NOW and shouldn't be hindered by waiting out one player.


This time of year is crazy sure. But A+ prospects or ready made youngins with big potential don't get thrown around for fill ins. Kakko improves every line he plays with, stats schmats really. He needs to grow some and get involved, then he'll get noticed. Laf was bad last year also, same thing.
Feb. 27 at 8:00 p.m.
#37
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,958
Likes: 1,446
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Agreed and Puljujarvi is a very good example. Even when looking at his season-by-season stats he also has a recent blip of 36 points in 65 games, but could never really put it all together.


Coaches love Kakko. Totally different animal
Feb. 27 at 8:24 p.m.
#38
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
This time of year is crazy sure. But A+ prospects or ready made youngins with big potential don't get thrown around for fill ins. Kakko improves every line he plays with, stats schmats really. He needs to grow some and get involved, then he'll get noticed. Laf was bad last year also, same thing.


Dude, I'm really not trying to talk trash here, but Kakko is no longer an A+ prospect. I mean, he's not a prospect anymore.
Christian17 liked this.
Feb. 27 at 8:25 p.m.
#39
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Coaches love Kakko. Totally different animal


Not a different animal at all. JP was a 4th overall pick with very similar attributes and expectations. Are they apples to apples? No, but they have far more in common than not.
Christian17 liked this.
Feb. 27 at 8:26 p.m.
#40
Jah1722
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 2,896
Quoting: Christian17
1.5M for 6 seasons ain’t that bad with the cap going up as much as it will. Having a first in 2025 would be worth more asset-wise than 6 years of 1.5M


It’s not a flat rate. 1.1, 2.3, 2.6 and then 1.5 for the next 3 years. 6 seasons of dead money isnt a good thing. And when the kids are up they’ll all be due raises plus the EP40 contract. The ducks would be a cap team team in 2-3 years. It’s an issue.
Feb. 27 at 8:29 p.m.
#41
Canucks Fan... Help
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 526
Likes: 328
Make it the 2024 ANA 1st assuming it's not top 5, and you've got a deal. Can even keep Lacombe and Jones if you want, they don't really carry any weight.
Feb. 27 at 8:31 p.m.
#42
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,958
Likes: 1,446
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Not a different animal at all. JP was a 4th overall pick with very similar attributes and expectations. Are they apples to apples? No, but they have far more in common than not.


Apples & oranges. Coaches & linemates love Kakko. Stat watch all you want, he's going to have a good career
Feb. 27 at 8:32 p.m.
#43
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Apples & oranges. Coaches & linemates love Kakko. Stat watch all you want, he's going to have a good career


LOL Dude, what are you talking about? I'm talking about their styles of play and skillset.
Feb. 27 at 8:33 p.m.
#44
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,958
Likes: 1,446
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
LOL Dude, what are you talking about? I'm talking about their styles of play and skillset.


Ya, one is good, one is not
Feb. 27 at 8:40 p.m.
#45
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 9,687
Likes: 4,536
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Ya, one is good, one is not


LOL Ok, homer.
Fox_Czar_Cup and Christian17 liked this.
Feb. 27 at 9:29 p.m.
#46
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 472
Likes: 72
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
Ya, one is good, one is not


Literally had these exact same discussion with Oilers fans about Puljujarvi a couple years ago. A savvy management will realize that regardless of whether Kakko turns into a serviceable top 6 forward it probably won’t lineup with this cores window so best to get players that can help in that window with what mitigated value he still has.
Feb. 27 at 9:33 p.m.
#47
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 472
Likes: 72
Quoting: YesThisIsFlo
Make it the 2024 ANA 1st assuming it's not top 5, and you've got a deal. Can even keep Lacombe and Jones if you want, they don't really carry any weight.


Lacombe definitely moves the needle you just don’t know who he is, but other GMs definitely do, and he looks like he’ll be bonafide top 4 dman with offensive upside.

The trade was the Ducks pick top 5 protected and the rangers 1st. Along with the other pieces. It’s pretty much same value as the panthers Tkachuck trade just different age groups and expanded team control on the assets.
Feb. 28 at 12:44 a.m.
#48
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2020
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 1,535
Rangers probably accept
Feb. 28 at 1:19 a.m.
#49
Canucks Fan... Help
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 526
Likes: 328
Quoting: Christian17
Lacombe definitely moves the needle you just don’t know who he is, but other GMs definitely do, and he looks like he’ll be bonafide top 4 dman with offensive upside.

The trade was the Ducks pick top 5 protected and the rangers 1st. Along with the other pieces. It’s pretty much same value as the panthers Tkachuck trade just different age groups and expanded team control on the assets.


Oh no, I know who he is.

He's a dman with solid defensive accumen, but almost zero offensive or puck moving ability. He's playing 2nd pair minutes on Anaheim because the team is awful, and he's getting absolutely buried in it. But he's also 23, and will improve and stabilize, but I see him as a future defensive 3rd pairing dman on a good team or top 4 on a bad one.

Anyways, that doesnt move the needle for EP40.

Anyways 2.0, the trade was the 2025 Anaheim 1st. I wrote that it needs to be the 2024 Anaheim 1st.
Feb. 28 at 12:50 p.m.
#50
Mac1010
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2018
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 723
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Wrong, not happening, keep dreaming


Right, would never be that many first, go look at everyone else trades and read an article or two which are all saying the same thing.
and doesnt matter oilers arent going to waste assets they need to go on a cup run anyways. they will just buy him out in the summer and not pay anyone a dime. ( exceot campbell of course)
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll