SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline

Created by: Wingsfannn9191
Team: 2023-24 Detroit Red Wings
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 6, 2024
Published: Mar. 6, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
DET
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (MTL)
Additional Details:
Wings get rid or a body so they can add someone else or bring up berggren
WPG
  1. Fabbri, Robby ($1,000,000 retained)
Additional Details:
Jets add further depth by adding a 20 goal score in fabbri and have him for next season as well at 3 mill
2.
ARI
  1. Berggren, Jonatan
  2. 2024 1st round pick (DET)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (DET)
3.
ANA
  1. Holl, Justin ($500,000 retained)
  2. Viro, Eemil
  3. 2026 3rd round pick (DET)
Additional Details:
Ducks receive holl to replace gudas on the right side and hope he can bounce back after clearly not fitting in with the wings.

Aside from the pick they also get prospect viro
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
2025
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the STL
2026
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
Logo of the DET
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$83,500,000$83,575,140$0$4,200,000-$75,140
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$7,875,000$7,875,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,100,000$5,100,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,460,000$1,460,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C, LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$825,000$825,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,125,000$1,125,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,400,000$3,400,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,750,000$4,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,125,000$4,125,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$900,000$900,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$2,343,750$2,343,750
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 6 at 4:23 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2022
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 1,451
Jets decline he's not worth a 4th he's also not scored 20 goals ever!
Mar. 6 at 4:24 p.m.
#2
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,309
Likes: 4,300
I don't think Verbeek signed Gudas in UFA just to trade him less than a year later.

Good luck attracting future UFA's to sign with you.
GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 6 at 4:25 p.m.
#3
Tank it baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 6,309
Likes: 4,300
Quoting: Howie
Jets decline he's not worth a 4th he's also not scored 20 goals ever!


Rubbish

Not saying Fabbri is a star or anything but he's worth at least a 4th. LOL
Mar. 6 at 4:26 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1,358
The last time Fabbri had 20 goals was 2014-2015.....when he played in the OHL.
Mar. 6 at 4:27 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,576
Likes: 11,958
Gudas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holl

Just a hilarious proposal, you think Verbeek is just gifting Gudas to you?! laugh laugh
Jded and OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 4:33 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Gudas is entirely unavailable. He’s our best Dman, and the perfect RD pair for our developing LD. He’s also our only RD under contract next year

We have zero, and I mean zero, interest in adding a LD. He will quite honestly never play a hockey game for ANA with Fowler, Montyukov, Lacombe, Vaakanainen, and Zellweger already there.

It would take a biiiig overpayment to reel in Gudas, who is almost certainly the least likely ‘veteran’ to be moved in ANA. This is not remotely close
GeneralLandro and OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 4:38 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 492
Likes: 134
that WPG trade looks like it could be a hit if wings retain some cap
Mar. 6 at 4:44 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,576
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: Jded
Gudas is entirely unavailable. He’s our best Dman, and the perfect RD pair for our developing LD. He’s also our only RD under contract next year

We have zero, and I mean zero, interest in adding a LD. He will quite honestly never play a hockey game for ANA with Fowler, Montyukov, Lacombe, Vaakanainen, and Zellweger already there.

It would take a biiiig overpayment to reel in Gudas, who is almost certainly the least likely ‘veteran’ to be moved in ANA. This is not remotely close


I think they’re all in tonight alone with Gudas and Lindstrom

I’d be interested to see Zelly and Lacombe try a couple reps at forward honestly
Mar. 6 at 4:47 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I think they’re all in tonight alone with Gudas and Lindstrom

I’d be interested to see Zelly and Lacombe try a couple reps at forward honestly


Are you being serious? Lacombe is not actually a big offensive presence, there’s no way he makes sense anywhere but LD. Zellweger has played surprisingly good defense (as in what he does in his own zone off the puck), there’s no way I’d risk his development right now.

If we need forwards that’s what the Gulls are for. Nesterenko, Regenda etc can get some reps
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 4:48 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 71
Likes: 18
Gudas would be a nice add to the Wings but he signed a full NMC knowing he wasn't going to the playoffs so I don't think he has any interest in moving. Either way not enough for the Ducks consider moving him.

Idk why people love to hate on Fabbri, he gets injured but he is a good 3rd line scorer who plays aggressively for being under 6', can fill in at C. Can make the overpay argument but per this trade $3Mx2 is fair value.

Seems like a fair offer for Crouse, I think Arizona wants prospects over picks but they do seem to love picks so who knows.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 4:52 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2020
Posts: 15,923
Likes: 7,077
Low end depth like Fabbri shouldn't cost a high 2nd. The Jets also likely would not want Fabbri's contract next year.
Mar. 6 at 5:10 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,576
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: Jded
Are you being serious? Lacombe is not actually a big offensive presence, there’s no way he makes sense anywhere but LD. Zellweger has played surprisingly good defense (as in what he does in his own zone off the puck), there’s no way I’d risk his development right now.

If we need forwards that’s what the Gulls are for. Nesterenko, Regenda etc can get some reps


Saw on Twitter we were going 11F & 7D — called up Regenda and Gawdin I think as well

Threw Jackson in there since he used to be a forward
Mar. 6 at 5:11 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 10,613
Likes: 8,227
Probably need to retain 50% to get a second for Fabbri.
Anaheim has zero interest in trading Guess, especially for that garbage proposal.
Arizona likely prefer to keep Crouse.
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 5:13 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Saw on Twitter we were going 11F & 7D — called up Regenda and Gawdin I think as well

Threw Jackson in there since he used to be a forward


Imo it makes more sense to trade Lacombe than try to transition him to FWD. As for our next game, I’d put the priority on the development of our young players over a balanced lineup. We’re almost certainly going to lose either way and the points don’t help us. I wouldn’t mess with Zell’s development in any way shape or form. If there isn’t room on the roster for him right now that’s not a problem. He’s a smaller guy, let him keep developing in the AHL
GeneralLandro and OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 5:22 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,576
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: Jded
Imo it makes more sense to trade Lacombe than try to transition him to FWD. As for our next game, I’d put the priority on the development of our young players over a balanced lineup. We’re almost certainly going to lose either way and the points don’t help us. I wouldn’t mess with Zell’s development in any way shape or form. If there isn’t room on the roster for him right now that’s not a problem. He’s a smaller guy, let him keep developing in the AHL


No I think we look to trade him this summer honestly

I wasn’t meaning transition either of them, just like 2-3 shifts each possibly with 2 other forwards since there would be the mismatch lines
Mar. 6 at 5:35 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Quoting: GeneralLandro
No I think we look to trade him this summer honestly

I wasn’t meaning transition either of them, just like 2-3 shifts each possibly with 2 other forwards since there would be the mismatch lines


Ah gotcha. Yeah that wouldn’t surprise me either. I’d rather see Fowler go, personally. Just not sure how they accomplish that. If they can’t, I’d even rather Fowler keep being an inept RD for us so we can keep the LD talent

Mintyukov - Gudas
Zellweger - Big new RD acquisition (Pesce? smile)
Lacombe - Lindstrom
Vaak
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 5:52 p.m.
#17
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,550
Likes: 25,420
Quoting: Jded
Ah gotcha. Yeah that wouldn’t surprise me either. I’d rather see Fowler go, personally. Just not sure how they accomplish that. If they can’t, I’d even rather Fowler keep being an inept RD for us so we can keep the LD talent

Mintyukov - Gudas
Zellweger - Big new RD acquisition (Pesce? smile)
Lacombe - Lindstrom
Vaak

Hidden in your lineup there is one of the reasons why I think it would be a mistake to trade Frankie Vatrano: are we going to be able to sign the needed big-ticket free-agent RhD if in the back of everybody's mind is the thought that Pat Verbeek might just trade him before the contract is up?
Mar. 6 at 6:03 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 57
Likes: 5
Quoting: Jded
Gudas is entirely unavailable. He’s our best Dman, and the perfect RD pair for our developing LD. He’s also our only RD under contract next year

We have zero, and I mean zero, interest in adding a LD. He will quite honestly never play a hockey game for ANA with Fowler, Montyukov, Lacombe, Vaakanainen, and Zellweger already there.

It would take a biiiig overpayment to reel in Gudas, who is almost certainly the least likely ‘veteran’ to be moved in ANA. This is not remotely close


15 in 47 and a few years back 17 in 56 games. I'd say hes a 20 goal scorer but if you want to be "technical " yes hes "technically" not hit 20
Mar. 6 at 6:03 p.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,576
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: Jded
Ah gotcha. Yeah that wouldn’t surprise me either. I’d rather see Fowler go, personally. Just not sure how they accomplish that. If they can’t, I’d even rather Fowler keep being an inept RD for us so we can keep the LD talent

Mintyukov - Gudas
Zellweger - Big new RD acquisition (Pesce? smile)
Lacombe - Lindstrom
Vaak


You will never catch me getting rid of Cam, I love him to much

Mintyukov Fowler Zellweger Vaakanainen left side imo

I still think if we could steal Trouba to pair with Minty, that would be awesome — Gudas with Zellweger and then Helleson time with Cam?
Mar. 6 at 6:05 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 57
Likes: 5
For the people saying ducks wouldnt trade gudas cause they just signed him his name has been out there
Mar. 6 at 7:08 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Hidden in your lineup there is one of the reasons why I think it would be a mistake to trade Frankie Vatrano: are we going to be able to sign the needed big-ticket free-agent RhD if in the back of everybody's mind is the thought that Pat Verbeek might just trade him before the contract is up?


Imo that’s what trade protections are for. And we don’t at all have a reputation for moving UFAs with term. This would be a rare exception, and one where there’s only one year left. I don’t see that impacting anyone’s decision. That said, I still don’t expect Vatrano to get traded
OldNYIfan liked this.
Mar. 6 at 7:10 p.m.
#22
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Quoting: GeneralLandro
You will never catch me getting rid of Cam, I love him to much

Mintyukov Fowler Zellweger Vaakanainen left side imo

I still think if we could steal Trouba to pair with Minty, that would be awesome — Gudas with Zellweger and then Helleson time with Cam?


How the hell are we gonna steal Trouba? He’s their captain. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for it, but I don’t see any way we pull that.
Love Cam, but he isn’t going to be re-signed, and now he’s blocking guys who development time that are ready for the NHL. And frankly I don’t know that I’ve seen him play worse hockey than this year. I’m cool with letting him find a new home a bit early. And I like Lacombe for a 3LD. He plays the role decently now, wait until he’s in his prime
Mar. 6 at 7:12 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Quoting: Wingsfannn9191
15 in 47 and a few years back 17 in 56 games. I'd say hes a 20 goal scorer but if you want to be "technical " yes hes "technically" not hit 20


Huh? Send that to the wrong person? 🤔
Mar. 6 at 7:13 p.m.
#24
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 1,793
Quoting: Wingsfannn9191
For the people saying ducks wouldnt trade gudas cause they just signed him his name has been out there


No, not by anybody serious it hasn’t
OldNYIfan and GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 6 at 7:48 p.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 15,576
Likes: 11,958
Quoting: Jded
How the hell are we gonna steal Trouba? He’s their captain. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for it, but I don’t see any way we pull that.
Love Cam, but he isn’t going to be re-signed, and now he’s blocking guys who development time that are ready for the NHL. And frankly I don’t know that I’ve seen him play worse hockey than this year. I’m cool with letting him find a new home a bit early. And I like Lacombe for a 3LD. He plays the role decently now, wait until he’s in his prime


What would you offer LaCombe?

I’ve messed with something like a Strome for Trouba swap or like a 3 way selling Strome and then trading for Trouba — 99.1% not happening but a fun thought I think
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll