SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Operation Soft Rebuild Is On

Created by: edeangel84
Team: 2024-25 Pittsburgh Penguins
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 10, 2024
Published: Mar. 10, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
My hopes are that this is a transformative offseason. There is no way FSG will take on a full rebuild and get rid of the legends on this team, especially 87. However, you can do a soft rebuild. Put some of the valuable pieces that we have left on the market. Pettersson leads that list and he should have plenty of suitors who would love to have him in their lineup for opening night. He would fetch a solid return unless we hold onto him and end up selling him off as a rental. We all know how that goes, so capitalize on him this summer. I think Rakell can be moved albeit the return would require some kind of cap coming back and a team that sees itself as on the rise. That’s why I think Arizona will look to use their cap space to cheaply acquire veterans. They can’t keep being the way they are and expect to generate a shred of interest in that franchise. Rust should be on the market but I think Sid will want him on his line next year. Therefore, I doubt he goes anywhere. I don’t think anyone will offer up a trade for Jarry but if it’s decent we should take it. I think this season is as good as it gets for him. I don’t see him heading upward from here. Guys like Eller, Acciari, Nieto, and of course Smith should all be available. I don’t think there’s a market for Smith and I think he will be on the team for opening night. I can see a cheap rental trade near next year’s deadline.

As far the coaching goes, Sully should want a new younger team near contention. We need to part ways and send a message of change but not too much. Keep a familiar face around for our veterans, so I say Vellucci gets the job for next season. He has a solid resume and I’d say let him pick his assistants and take the wheel. I also am predicting a front office role for Jeff Carter. Dubas loves the Soo guys.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$950,000
2$950,000
1$950,000
1$900,000
1$900,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$825,000
2$925,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,000,000
1$950,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
1$825,000
Offer Sheets
Offer sheet annual average (AAV) is calculated by dividing the contract value by the lower of: 1. The contract length, or 2. Five years
PLAYERAAVCOMPENSATION
Petman, Ville$825,000No Compensation
Lind, Kole$925,000No Compensation
Trades
1.
PIT
  1. 2024 1st round pick (PIT)
SJS
  1. 2025 1st round pick (PIT)
2.
PIT
  1. 2024 1st round pick (VAN)
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (VGK)
  3. 2025 1st round pick (FLA)
CGY
  1. 2024 1st round pick (PIT)
  2. 2025 4th round pick (PIT)
Additional Details:
Draft trade. We move back and more importantly get a 1st back in next year’s deeper draft.
3.
PIT
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. 2024 3rd round pick (ARI)
  3. 2025 3rd round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Another pre draft trade. Rakell goes back west to a team that looks like it may finally be heading up the standings. They get to add a shooter for a 1.5M cap differential next year.
ARI
4.
PIT
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (MIN)
MIN
  1. Eller, Lars
Additional Details:
Post draft trade
5.
PIT
  1. Holtz, Alexander
  2. 2025 1st round pick (NJD)
Additional Details:
Top 10 protected pick
NJD
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
Additional Details:
The big trade of the offseason.
6.
PIT
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (DET)
DET
  1. 2026 3rd round pick (PIT)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the ARI
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYR
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the DET
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the FLA
2026
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,700,000$78,880,001$0$927,500$8,819,999
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$8,700,000$8,700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,125,000$5,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the New Jersey Devils
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
UFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$925,000$925,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$5,375,000$5,375,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$6,100,000$6,100,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$886,667$886,667 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
G
RFA - 2
$950,000$950,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Detroit Red Wings
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$950,000$950,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
$900,000$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 10 at 9:12 p.m.
#1
CANUCK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 15
Likes: 3
Flames decline, if they accept their gm would be awarded the dunce cap
Mar. 10 at 9:14 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: NUCKHEAD3000
Flames decline, if they accept their gm would be awarded the dunce cap


??? They’d be moving up probably 12 to 15 picks.
Mar. 10 at 9:15 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 1,184
Hard to see CGY doing that. They move up a bunch, but I doubt they wanna risk not having any 2025 1sts a year ahead. That FLA pick is also in the conditions of the Monahan MTL trade, so not sure they can move it.
Rakell seems like a tough move this summer.
Eller trade seems fine.
Moving MP28 makes us weaker, I dont see the point.
Take out the 3rd for Holl.
NUCKHEAD3000 liked this.
Mar. 10 at 9:16 p.m.
#4
CANUCK
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 15
Likes: 3
Quoting: edeangel84
??? They’d be moving up probably 12 to 15 picks.


Giving up an extra first round pick to move up 12-15 spots? idk how much that brings to the table, because theyd now miss out on their first round pick next year
Mar. 10 at 9:24 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 1,000
Considering the fact that Kerfoot fits our bottom 6 far better than Rakell does, and the fact that Rakell is vastly overpaid, Arizona will be declining
Mar. 10 at 9:58 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 350
The florida pick in 2025 will most likely be Calgarys own pick which would then be a top 10. I could possibly see Calgary and Ptisburgh swapping their own firsts this year with Calgary adding a 2nd depending on who's available.
edeangel84 liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:00 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 323
Likes: 182
Quoting: Marcsnack
That FLA pick is also in the conditions of the Monahan MTL trade, so not sure they can move it.


You can move conditional picks as long as you have the appropriate condition in the trade. For instance, look at the Rangers trade for Wennberg. They sent back, among other things, a conditional pick. The pick was Dallas' 2025 4th round pick and it would upgrade to Dallas' 2025 3rd round pick if Nils Lundkvist scored 55 cumulative points in 2022-23 and 2023-24. The reason it included the condition is because they acquired the pick from Dallas with those same conditions, so they wouldn't own the pick until this season ends for the outcome to be official (it's all but definitive that it'll be the 4th rounder...Lundkvist has 31 combined points in 106 games so he'd need to suddenly start scoring at over a point per game pace from scoring at a roughly a point every 3 games pace this year and a point every 4 game pace last year).
Mar. 10 at 10:06 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 1,184
Quoting: jamnjon
You can move conditional picks as long as you have the appropriate condition in the trade. For instance, look at the Rangers trade for Wennberg. They sent back, among other things, a conditional pick. The pick was Dallas' 2025 4th round pick and it would upgrade to Dallas' 2025 3rd round pick if Nils Lundkvist scored 55 cumulative points in 2022-23 and 2023-24. The reason it included the condition is because they acquired the pick from Dallas with those same conditions, so they wouldn't own the pick until this season ends for the outcome to be official (it's all but definitive that it'll be the 4th rounder...Lundkvist has 31 combined points in 106 games so he'd need to suddenly start scoring at over a point per game pace from scoring at a roughly a point every 3 games pace this year and a point every 4 game pace last year).


Yeah for sure, you are right. I just dont know if CGY is willing to risk potentially moving a high pick.
Mar. 10 at 10:11 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1,001
i would not trade holtz for Pettersson straight up let alone throwing in a 1st
Calgary not doing that for that very reason. the 2025 draft is better
SJ would take Smith and a 2nd for a 7th
NickC1988 liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:13 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: NUCKHEAD3000
Giving up an extra first round pick to move up 12-15 spots? idk how much that brings to the table, because theyd now miss out on their first round pick next year


Well it’s Florida’s pick not their own. I think if the bring her scenario presents itself a team with multiple 1sts could want to get into the top 10.
Mar. 10 at 10:14 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: vols94
i would not trade holtz for Pettersson straight up let alone throwing in a 1st
Calgary not doing that for that very reason. the 2025 draft is better
SJ would take Smith and a 2nd for a 7th


You’re in lonely territory then among Devils fans who seem to really want Pettersson.
Mar. 10 at 10:15 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: Yotes269
Considering the fact that Kerfoot fits our bottom 6 far better than Rakell does, and the fact that Rakell is vastly overpaid, Arizona will be declining


Vastly overpaid? He makes what a normal 2nd line winger makes.
Mar. 10 at 10:16 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: Marcsnack
Yeah for sure, you are right. I just dont know if CGY is willing to risk potentially moving a high pick.


What would make you think Florida’s 2025 1st will be a high pick? Calgary already lost their own first next year to Montreal, which is a much bigger issue.
Mar. 10 at 10:19 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1,001
Quoting: edeangel84
You’re in lonely territory then among Devils fans who seem to really want Pettersson.




27 yr old LD vs a 22 yr old C. They would not trade Holtz for anything last year.
Mar. 10 at 10:19 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2020
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 1,184
Quoting: edeangel84
What would make you think Florida’s 2025 1st will be a high pick? Calgary already lost their own first next year to Montreal, which is a much bigger issue.


MTL willing likely be getting FLA's 1st based on the conditions, so I doubt CGY would wanna send us their 1st.
edeangel84 liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:20 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2024
Posts: 180
Likes: 62
I don't get why so many trades have the wild taking old washed up bottom 6 players. We are trying to get younger and use our prospects to prepare for a run in the net 2-5 years. We have no reason to be trading for a guy like Ellers.
Mar. 10 at 10:21 p.m.
#17
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: Shaun80
The florida pick in 2025 will most likely be Calgarys own pick which would then be a top 10. I could possibly see Calgary and Ptisburgh swapping their own firsts this year with Calgary adding a 2nd depending on who's available.


I’d do that
Mar. 10 at 10:24 p.m.
#18
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: vols94
27 yr old LD vs a 22 yr old C. They would not trade Holtz for anything last year.


So I’m off then because it had seemed to me the view on Holtz was that he may be slipping based off his draft status. Now I don’t blame you for wanting to keep him but I would think of all the forwards you could move for a Dman that fits your need just like Pettersson does he’d have to be at or near the top. I would think he is fair trade bait compared to someone like Mercer. I wouldn’t think Fitzgerald would move him for a Dman.
Mar. 10 at 10:25 p.m.
#19
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: Marcsnack
MTL willing likely be getting FLA's 1st based on the conditions, so I doubt CGY would wanna send us their 1st.


Fair point. The conditions in that Monahan deal are nuts.
Marcsnack and NUCKHEAD3000 liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:26 p.m.
#20
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: SimonVenell
I don't get why so many trades have the wild taking old washed up bottom 6 players. We are trying to get younger and use our prospects to prepare for a run in the net 2-5 years. We have no reason to be trading for a guy like Ellers.


It seems that C has been a depth problem for some time there. Ek is phenomenal and Rossi should be your 2C. What are the plans then for 3 or 4C?
SimonVenell liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:27 p.m.
#21
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1,001
Quoting: edeangel84
So I’m off then because it had seemed to me the view on Holtz was that he may be slipping based off his draft status. Now I don’t blame you for wanting to keep him but I would think of all the forwards you could move for a Dman that fits your need just like Pettersson does he’d have to be at or near the top. I would think he is fair trade bait compared to someone like Mercer. I wouldn’t think Fitzgerald would move him for a Dman.


If they move Holtz they could get an in kind younger player. Like the Drysdale deal
Mar. 10 at 10:29 p.m.
#22
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: vols94
If they move Holtz they could get an in kind younger player. Like the Drysdale deal


You have plenty of young Dman though. Your problem has been missing Hamilton of course but where’s the experienced Dman who can slot in and help your team out? Because your defense has been your let down this year.
Mar. 10 at 10:43 p.m.
#23
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,462
Likes: 19,628
Quoting: edeangel84
??? They’d be moving up probably 12 to 15 picks.


That Florida pick is tied to the Monahan trade and will almost certainly be the pick going to Montreal because Calgary's pick is top 10 protected (and they will likely have a top 10 pick in 2025). In other words Calgary is essentially trading their top 10 pick from 2025 + Vancouver's 2024 pick for Pittsburgh's 2024 pick, which is a horrible deal
edeangel84 liked this.
Mar. 10 at 10:44 p.m.
#24
Thread Starter
JimmyPaek
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,945
Likes: 1,175
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
That Florida pick is tied to the Monahan trade and will almost certainly be the pick going to Montreal because Calgary's pick is top 10 protected (and they will likely have a top 10 pick in 2025). In other words Calgary is essentially trading their top 10 pick from 2025 + Vancouver's 2024 pick for Pittsburgh's 2024 pick, which is a horrible deal


I forgot about how absurdly complex the conditions of that Monahan trade were.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Mar. 11 at 9:26 a.m.
#25
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2021
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 1,000
Quoting: edeangel84
Vastly overpaid? He makes what a normal 2nd line winger makes.


$5m for barely .5 PPG production and a horrendous injury history is vastly over paid. And that’s before we get into the fact his contract has 4 more years, and he’s at best s 3 RW in Arizona.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll