SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

kings

Created by: CCC87
Team: 2024-25 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 12, 2024
Published: Mar. 12, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
8$8,000,000
2$1,500,000
7$7,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$1,000,000
1$1,000,000
1$3,000,000
1$2,500,000
1$800,000
1$900,000
1$3,000,000
5$8,200,000
Trades
1.
LAK
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
  2. 2024 4th round pick (NJD)
  3. 2025 2nd round pick (CGY)
2.
LAK
  1. Swayman, Jeremy [RFA Rights]
  2. 2025 3rd round pick (BOS)
BOS
  1. Dubois, Pierre-Luc
  2. 2024 1st round pick (LAK)
  3. 2024 2nd round pick (DAL)
  4. 2025 2nd round pick (CGY)
Retained Salary Transactions
Termination Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2025
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2026
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
20$88,500,000$89,550,000$1,850,000$0-$1,050,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$8,200,000$8,200,000
LW, RW
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,000,000$8,000,000
LW, C
RFA
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,200,000$4,200,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$875,000$875,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW, LW
RFA
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, C
UFA
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LW, RW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,125,000$4,125,000
LD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$900,000$900,000
G
UFA
$800,000$800,000
LD
UFA
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 12 at 8:43 a.m.
#1
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,346
Likes: 7,053
i think if you take out swayman, the value is close. this is ridiculous.
palhal and SJSF liked this.
Mar. 12 at 10:25 a.m.
#2
Bruins40
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 159
Likes: 16
Absolutely not on Swayman Ullmark is the guy that's gonna go Swayman is the future here
Mar. 12 at 10:28 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 6,545
Likes: 4,554
LA is stuck with PLD, and Blake would get fired the moment he tries to make a losing trade for him.

LAs system works well enough that goalies will be lining up to take budget contracts to play there. Talbot is an all-star with a .916SV% and Rittich has a .919 SV%, both combined are less than $2M against the cap. LA need PLD to at least rebound to a $6M player and they will be fine. PLD has been awful not disagreeing, but he has improved and if that continues the Kings can salvage a player out of this.
Mar. 12 at 11:35 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 1,221
Quoting: tryger
LA is stuck with PLD, and Blake would get fired the moment he tries to make a losing trade for him.

LAs system works well enough that goalies will be lining up to take budget contracts to play there. Talbot is an all-star with a .916SV% and Rittich has a .919 SV%, both combined are less than $2M against the cap. LA need PLD to at least rebound to a $6M player and they will be fine. PLD has been awful not disagreeing, but he has improved and if that continues the Kings can salvage a player out of this.


Ullmark for PLD is a trade that frankly Blake can easily sell. His performance the past two years have him ranked as a top 5 to 10 goalies and I’d argue that he likely puts distance from that horrific trade and contract package you gave to PLD.

I agree with you that Riitch has played really well, but what level of confidence do you have in him as he plays more? Copley looked good last year only to look like garbage this year. Talbott predictably wore down and his numbers have been regressing. He is still around .200 GsaX/60, which is about the range where you start going from positive to average. I agree that the defensive structure of the Kings is phenomenal for insulating a goalie.

Ullmark is better than Talbott on that metric (.337) and his two year performance is the best in the league (combined he is easily top 5). Put him behind LA’s defensive structure, which is arguably the best in the league, and I think you’d see a massive upgrade for whatever it’s worth.

The open issue is I don’t believe PLD makes as much sense for Boston when I look at the player. He’s not as strong at the faceoff as the guy he’d be moving to wing in Zacha. He is probably a 6m player making 8.5m. I love the 4 years of 60+ points before 25, but I think the biggest problem is that he was traded for a horrificly bad package, his role in LA will basically prevent him from living up to the contract, and his reputation as a malcontent has followed him.

I can see an Ullmark for PLD deal working, but not sure what the draft capital going back to Boston would be required. I personally see them signing Lindholm and trading Ullmark for draft capital.
tryger liked this.
Mar. 12 at 12:47 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 6,545
Likes: 4,554
Quoting: Celtics21
Ullmark for PLD is a trade that frankly Blake can easily sell. His performance the past two years have him ranked as a top 5 to 10 goalies and I’d argue that he likely puts distance from that horrific trade and contract package you gave to PLD.

I agree with you that Riitch has played really well, but what level of confidence do you have in him as he plays more? Copley looked good last year only to look like garbage this year. Talbott predictably wore down and his numbers have been regressing. He is still around .200 GsaX/60, which is about the range where you start going from positive to average. I agree that the defensive structure of the Kings is phenomenal for insulating a goalie.

Ullmark is better than Talbott on that metric (.337) and his two year performance is the best in the league (combined he is easily top 5). Put him behind LA’s defensive structure, which is arguably the best in the league, and I think you’d see a massive upgrade for whatever it’s worth.

The open issue is I don’t believe PLD makes as much sense for Boston when I look at the player. He’s not as strong at the faceoff as the guy he’d be moving to wing in Zacha. He is probably a 6m player making 8.5m. I love the 4 years of 60+ points before 25, but I think the biggest problem is that he was traded for a horrificly bad package, his role in LA will basically prevent him from living up to the contract, and his reputation as a malcontent has followed him.

I can see an Ullmark for PLD deal working, but not sure what the draft capital going back to Boston would be required. I personally see them signing Lindholm and trading Ullmark for draft capital.



If rumors serve correctly Ullmark might have had LA on his No Trade List. He has the ability to really pick his destination, if he was open to a trade to LA that is where we will start this discussion.

Los Angeles had a really big goalie issue at the start of this season they have put up a .912 SV% / 2.47 GAA across their 3 goaltenders this season. Contrast this to their abysmal .892 SV % / 2.99 GAA last season .895 SV, 3.74 GAA numbers from two seasons ago. In terms of the pipeline of goalies coming: LA made a solid move taking Portillo (who is 2nd in the AHL in SV% .925) and Hampton Slukynsky who is absolutely tearing up the USHL. Blake is very close to getting fired if he makes another failing big move. Ullmark would absolutely bolster these numbers but it doesn't address LAs biggest long term issues.

PLD was signed because Kopitar will eventually need to move down the lineup and Byfield has thrived more left-wing than his natural center position. Blake assumed 3 top-6 centers would edge out top heavy teams like Edmonton and Vegas. PLD has spent most of this season with first year pro Alex Laferriere. If you place him with more professional players he does help find the net, last night for example he set up the Kempe goal. His biggest issue is he is playing in a much more defensively tight system, which he is very slowly learning. Ultimately if LA moved on from PLD, it would be for another struggling top-6 center with a similar cap hit. I think the Kings will stick with PLD and try to salvage the player, at 25 and his size and past history it's not crazy to think he can return to being a top-6 20-25 goal center in the NHL.

The final issue is Blake, he made the mistake on Cal Petersen to signing a large contract before he was tried out a 1A and moved one of their top assets in Vilardi for PLD. These two issues have him on a very tight leash and him not making a move at the deadline is indicative that he's trying to stop the bleeding and work with what he has. I think if he does make a move for PLD it won't be for a rental and it won't include a goaltender. The Kings will probably have some weird tandem like Fleury and Matt Murray (connection through the Kings goalie coach who used to be the Pens coach) on budget contracts and put PLD with wingers who make up for his mistakes.
Celtics21 liked this.
Mar. 12 at 12:53 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 1,221
Ullmark has LA on his no trade list, but I assume he is going to use that NMC to force an extension. He craves stability and Id argue that LA is pretty close in terms of culture to Boston.

I’d still suggest that GSax suggests that your goalie stats are inflated by how good the Kings are at insulating a goalie. Now imagine how that would look like if you had a goalie the caliber of Ullmark.

PLD isn’t untradable, but I don’t see this deal happening because I don’t believe both GM’s have the stones to do it. I see Boston signing Lindholm and the PLD option will go away completely
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll