SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Continuing to tear it down

Created by: Michael
Team: 2024-25 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 13, 2024
Published: Mar. 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$800,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$900,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
1$900,000
1$800,000
1$800,000
2$1,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
2$2,500,000
1$800,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. 2025 6th round pick (SJS)
2.
CGY
  1. Kaliyev, Arthur [RFA Rights]
  2. 2025 1st round pick (LAK)
  3. 2025 6th round pick (LAK)
  4. 2026 3rd round pick (LAK)
Additional Details:
Also includes rights to G Cam Talbot
2025 pick is Top 8 protected
2026 pick upgrades to 2026 2nd if Markstrom wins 60 regular season games over two seasons combine
LAK
  1. Markström, Jacob ($1,000,000 retained)
3.
CGY
  1. 2025 2nd round pick (WPG)
  2. 2026 4th round pick (DAL)
4.
CGY
  1. 2024 2nd round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
Latest of NSH 2nd round picks
NSH
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew
  2. 2024 6th round pick (CGY)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the NJD
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CGY
2026
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$60,549,166$0$1,062,500$26,950,834
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$10,500,000$10,500,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,100,000$3,100,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, LW
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
LW
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,300,000$1,300,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
RW, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,250,000$6,250,000
LD/RD
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$900,000$900,000
G
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$823,333$823,333
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$787,500$787,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000
LD
RFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$775,000$775,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 13 at 11:30 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,351
Likes: 18,793
Didn't Markstrom say 'no' to a trade to LAK? (other Calgary fan had said that on here)
tryger liked this.
Mar. 13 at 11:32 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 4,643
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Didn't Markstrom say 'no' to a trade to LAK? (other Calgary fan had said that on here)


Markstrom has a full NMC he can say no to any team.
Mar. 13 at 11:34 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2016
Posts: 508
Likes: 165
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Didn't Markstrom say 'no' to a trade to LAK? (other Calgary fan had said that on here)


I haven't heard that he rejected LA. I thought that was rumored to be Ullmark at one point. Obviously any Markstrom deal centers on him accepting a trade to a new team.
I feel like LA would be a good fit for him provided he's willing to go there.
Mar. 13 at 11:34 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 4,643
LA declines, Markstrom has up and down seasons is 34 and ripe for decline. LA has spent enough on poor goaltending, they could get Ullmark for less.
Mar. 13 at 11:36 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 6,674
Likes: 4,643
Quoting: Michael
I haven't heard that he rejected LA. I thought that was rumored to be Ullmark at one point. Obviously any Markstrom deal centers on him accepting a trade to a new team.
I feel like LA would be a good fit for him provided he's willing to go there.


Markstrom doesn't want to leave and most of the vets in Calgary don't want that either, it is blocking the path for Wolf but it seems to be what the team wants. As for LA, there are cheaper, younger, and more consistent options without a full NMC.
Mar. 13 at 11:40 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 41,351
Likes: 18,793
Quoting: tryger
Markstrom has a full NMC he can say no to any team.


Quoting: Michael
I haven't heard that he rejected LA. I thought that was rumored to be Ullmark at one point. Obviously any Markstrom deal centers on him accepting a trade to a new team.
I feel like LA would be a good fit for him provided he's willing to go there.


He waived for New Jersey after Conroy and Fitzgerald had agreed to a trade...but Conroy had to later back out as ownership/management had second thoughts.

Around that time, I recall a Markstrom-to-LAK conversation on here and Calgary fan saying he only waived for NJD.

(I had thought he was only asked to waive for NJD)
Mar. 13 at 11:45 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2019
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 2,266
Entirely too optimistic a return for a 34 year old goalie who has been inconsistent year over year, has full control over where he goes (see Tarasenko return), and a commands a massive cap hit even with very minor retention.

Quick and easy "No thanks" from LA.
Mar. 13 at 12:17 p.m.
#8
ARAB05
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 810
Likes: 443
Quoting: tryger
LA declines, Markstrom has up and down seasons is 34 and ripe for decline. LA has spent enough on poor goaltending, they could get Ullmark for less.


They cant get Ullmark, he literally stopped a trade from going through to LA.
Mar. 13 at 12:33 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 10,290
Likes: 7,142
I can’t imagine a team trading for Mangiapane and his near $6m cap hit
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll