SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Zegras and caufield duo

Created by: CupContenderGM123
Published: Mar. 22 at 12:37 a.m.
Salary Cap: $83,500,000
Season Days: 20/192 (10%)
Central Registry Determination: This trade has met the central registry's trade checklist

Logo of the Anaheim DucksAnaheim Ducks

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Zegras, TrevorAnaheim DucksIR-$598,958011---20437--
2024 3rd round pick (Logo of the Pittsburgh PenguinsPIT)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Hutson, LaneMontreal CanadiensReserve List-$0001---------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Colorado AvalancheCOL)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$8,936,9882346674911
Change$598,9580-10000
Final$9,535,946 (↑)2345 (↓)674911-4-3-7

Logo of the Montreal CanadiensMontreal Canadiens

OutStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Hutson, LaneMontreal CanadiensReserve List-$0001---------
2024 2nd round pick (Logo of the Colorado AvalancheCOL)---010------
InStatusRetained SalaryEffective Cap HitRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Zegras, TrevorAnaheim DucksIR-$5,750,000011---20437--
2024 3rd round pick (Logo of the Pittsburgh PenguinsPIT)---010------
ChangeCap SpaceRosterSPCReserve ListDraft Rd 1Rd 2-3Rd 4-7GPGAPGAASv%
Initial$7,579,16723457151016
Change-$5,750,000010000
Final$1,829,167 (↓)2346 (↑)7151016437
Mar. 22 at 3:41 a.m.
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 10,881
Likes: 7,722
Buddy you are so far off value for this trade that's it's not even funny.

Try Reinbacher and MTLs 2nd for Zegras.
GeneralLandro liked this.
Mar. 22 at 6:01 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 496
Anaheim doesn't need for LDs... they're pretty set in that department.
GeneralLandro and aedoran liked this.
Mar. 22 at 6:02 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 496
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Buddy you are so far off value for this trade that's it's not even funny.

Try Reinbacher and MTLs 2nd for Zegras.


TBH if I'm Montreal, I'd rather trade your offer over his.
Mar. 22 at 7:51 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Today I learned that Lane Hutson is nearly as valuable as Trevor Zegras.

LOL.
Mar. 22 at 8:38 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 514
Likes: 174
Quoting: FriendlyGhost
Today I learned that Lane Hutson is nearly as valuable as Trevor Zegras.

LOL.


Hutson's offensive production numbers in the NCAA are better than Zegras' were....
Caufield liked this.
Mar. 22 at 8:48 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Edited Mar. 22 at 8:55 a.m.
Quoting: Jeff902
Hutson's offensive production numbers in the NCAA are better than Zegras' were....


Do I look like I give a ****?

D+2 vs. D+1. Not to mention, know who else outproduced Zegras (And Caufield) in 19-20? David Farrance.
Mar. 22 at 9:07 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 514
Likes: 174
Quoting: FriendlyGhost
Do I look like I give a ****?

D+2 vs. D+1. Not to mention, know who else outproduced Zegras (And Caufield) in 19-20? David Farrance.


I really can't see you, so have no idea whether you look like you "give a ***** ", or not? Frankly, I don't care how you look. I was simply commenting - just like you champ.
Caufield liked this.
Mar. 22 at 9:42 a.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Quoting: Jeff902
I really can't see you, so have no idea whether you look like you "give a ***** ", or not? Frankly, I don't care how you look. I was simply commenting - just like you champ.


Abandoned ship on the actual argument real quick once counter points came out. tears of joy
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Mar. 22 at 10:35 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 514
Likes: 174
Quoting: FriendlyGhost
Abandoned ship on the actual argument real quick once counter points came out. tears of joy


what arguement? I don't see an arguement
Caufield liked this.
Mar. 22 at 10:49 a.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Quoting: Jeff902
what arguement? I don't see an arguement


Read, genius.
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Mar. 22 at 11:33 a.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 514
Likes: 174
Quoting: FriendlyGhost
Read, genius.


I simply pointed out that Hutson's offensive numbers were greater than Zegras in the NCAA.
It takes more than 1 person to argue, and you are standing by yourself.
Have a spectacular day champ.
Mar. 22 at 12:46 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Quoting: Jeff902
I simply pointed out that Hutson's offensive numbers were greater than Zegras in the NCAA.
It takes more than 1 person to argue, and you are standing by yourself.
Have a spectacular day champ.


Yeah, and you conveniently pussed out when it was noted that Hutson is in his D+2 and that it's not uncommon for inferior prospects to outscore their superiors.

There's no argument because you made a dumb point and ****ed out when it collapsed like a house of cards. tears of joy

Hutson and Zegras are not nearly the same value. Have a spectacular day, champ.
GiggywithGibby liked this.
Mar. 22 at 1:15 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 514
Likes: 174
Quoting: FriendlyGhost
Yeah, and you conveniently pussed out when it was noted that Hutson is in his D+2 and that it's not uncommon for inferior prospects to outscore their superiors.

There's no argument because you made a dumb point and ****ed out when it collapsed like a house of cards. tears of joy

Hutson and Zegras are not nearly the same value. Have a spectacular day, champ.


Quoting: Jeff902
I simply pointed out that Hutson's offensive numbers were greater than Zegras in the NCAA.
It takes more than 1 person to argue, and you are standing by yourself.
Have a spectacular day champ.
Mar. 22 at 1:53 p.m.
#14
Sennecke is a gem
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 2,477
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Buddy you are so far off value for this trade that's it's not even funny.

Try Reinbacher and MTLs 2nd for Zegras.


good one lol
Mar. 22 at 2:25 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Quoting: Jeff902


Quoting: FriendlyGhost
Yeah, and you conveniently pussed out when it was noted that Hutson is in his D+2 and that it's not uncommon for inferior prospects to outscore their superiors.

There's no argument because you made a dumb point and ****ed out when it collapsed like a house of cards. tears of joy

Hutson and Zegras are not nearly the same value. Have a spectacular day, champ.
Mar. 22 at 2:31 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Quoting: Caufield
good one lol


Ehh, realistically you take the proven thing over the potential unless there's a mammoth gap between the two. So hypothetically if you were to compare Zegras and Reinbacher's value, I'd say Montreal would add... But there's not a chance in hell I'd trade Reinbacher for Zegras.

That said, it's about as laughable as the guy that said he'd do Reinbacher and a 2nd before he did Hutson and a 3rd. I'd take Reinbacher over Hutson 8 days a week.
Mar. 22 at 2:59 p.m.
#17
Sennecke is a gem
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2022
Posts: 4,567
Likes: 2,477
Quoting: FriendlyGhost
Ehh, realistically you take the proven thing over the potential unless there's a mammoth gap between the two. So hypothetically if you were to compare Zegras and Reinbacher's value, I'd say Montreal would add... But there's not a chance in hell I'd trade Reinbacher for Zegras.

That said, it's about as laughable as the guy that said he'd do Reinbacher and a 2nd before he did Hutson and a 3rd. I'd take Reinbacher over Hutson 8 days a week.


There is truth to that, but not sure a winger (he isn't a good forward) with terrible defensive responsibilities, and a massive dip to production is worth more than a RD, with top-pair potential, even if he hasn't proven in the NHL.

For Hutson though, way more fair value than you are making it out to be. He is the best player at the defense position the NCAA has seen in the past 30 years
Jeff902 liked this.
Mar. 22 at 4:10 p.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 508
Quoting: Caufield
There is truth to that, but not sure a winger (he isn't a good forward) with terrible defensive responsibilities, and a massive dip to production is worth more than a RD, with top-pair potential, even if he hasn't proven in the NHL.


Full disclaimer, I'm not a fan of Zegras at all, but "Massive dip to production" isn't really fair. It's pretty clear that what little time he's played this year he wasn't 100%.

I'd never trade Reinbacher for Zegras personally, but without being proven at all in NA hockey yet, I don't think it's all that absurd to say that they'd have to throw a 2nd on him to get a proven player, at the moment. Overall, I think Reinbacher becomes a much more valuable player, but until he's proven his value takes a hit. (Which is why teams rarely trade top prospects)

Quoting: Caufield
For Hutson though, way more fair value than you are making it out to be. He is the best player at the defense position the NCAA has seen in the past 30 years


Rangers fans were saying the same thing about Nils Lundkvist after his 20-21 SHL season lol.
Caufield liked this.
Mar. 23 at 8:28 a.m.
#19
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 22,182
Likes: 12,313
Quoting: Element23VM
Anaheim doesn't need for LDs... they're pretty set in that department.


Yeah but then you'd have to consider the other teams needs and most people can't be bothered with that. Plus if consider the other teams you can't offer the same package (of players you want to get rid o)f for every trade.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll