SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next season

Created by: Kyle_Davidson
Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 28, 2024
Published: Mar. 28, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Some tomfoolery included in the conditions, but the strategy is essentially to provide flexibility for the hawks and protection for the teams sending firsts. Ideally we would have 2 1sts in 24, 3 firsts in 25, and 2 firsts in 2026.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$950,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
8$6,000,000
2$2,000,000
2$950,000
2$950,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$7,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Lee, Anders
  2. 2025 1st round pick (NYI)
Additional Details:
2025 1st round pick is top 10 protected in 2025 and 2026. If the pick slides to a 2027 first round pick Chicago also receives a 3rd rounder in 27 or 28 islanders choice.
NYI
  1. Phillips, Isaak [RFA Rights]
  2. Raddysh, Taylor [RFA Rights]
Additional Details:
Hawks take on 2 years at 7 million to get a first round pick. In the case that the pick slides to 26 or 27, hawks would have a valuable piece to accelerate the rebuild.
2.
CHI
  1. Goodrow, Barclay ($641,667 retained)
  2. 2025 1st round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
Chicago is entitled to either a 2025 or 2026 choice at their discussion unless these picks are within the top 10 of the draft.

Ex: If NYR pick is not top 10 in 2025, Chicago can take that or choose to have a top 10 protected pick in 26. If the pick is top ten in 26, then a 27 unprotected first.
NYR
  1. 2025 4th round pick (NYR)
Additional Details:
The 4th round pick transfers to NYR if the pick is in 2025. If not, no pick is sent.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$77,076,667$0$5,775,000$10,423,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the New York Islanders
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the New York Rangers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,400,000$4,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000
RW
RFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 28 at 4:24 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 1,451
LOL. You want retention plus a 1st round pick for Goodrow. Rangers say pound sand with your absurd offer.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 28 at 4:27 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 5,824
Quoting: Onlyfairtrades1
LOL. You want retention plus a 1st round pick for Goodrow. Rangers say pound sand with your absurd offer.


Referencing this trade.

Retention doesn’t make or break the trade, but in my opinion a first is absolutely a fair ask to eat 3 years of that contract.
Mar. 28 at 4:32 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,269
Likes: 2,534
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Referencing this trade.

Retention doesn’t make or break the trade, but in my opinion a first is absolutely a fair ask to eat 3 years of that contract.


That’s fun and all but they will buy him out before paying that cost. Either a team wants him and he’s willing to go or it’s a buyout.. not a dump
Newgod77 liked this.
Mar. 28 at 4:35 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 1,451
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Referencing this trade.

Retention doesn’t make or break the trade, but in my opinion a first is absolutely a fair ask to eat 3 years of that contract.


Your opinion, which means nada to the Rangers. His contract is an easy buy out if Drury wants cap space so there is ZERO chance they give up a 1st round pick to trade him. ZERO.
Fox_Czar_Cup liked this.
Mar. 28 at 4:48 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 5,824
Quoting: Onlyfairtrades1
Your opinion, which means nada to the Rangers. His contract is an easy buy out if Drury wants cap space so there is ZERO chance they give up a 1st round pick to trade him. ZERO.


You underestimate the value of flexibility, 6 year buyout at this structure is somewhat limiting especially in the year his cap hit is ~3.5.

Also, I hate to break it to you, but neither your opinion nor mine makes a difference to any executive at the NHL level. Judging by your aggressive style of replying I think you are missing the point of posting on this forum, or at least deriving some sort of pleasure from attempting to put others down. In any case, you are now added to the ignore list not because you shared an opinion on the post, but because you seem like a generally unpleasant person.
LivingAnew liked this.
Mar. 28 at 4:50 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2018
Posts: 9,848
Likes: 5,824
Quoting: NYR1983
That’s fun and all but they will buy him out before paying that cost. Either a team wants him and he’s willing to go or it’s a buyout.. not a dump


The buyout in year three is pretty rough no? As a general rule I’m not estatic about taking a cap dump over two years, so if that truly is how the rangers will approach that problem I wish them the best of luck.
Mar. 28 at 4:57 p.m.
#7
B
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 7,955
Likes: 1,441
We retain 1.2 and get a mid pick because Goody @ 2.4m would get every GM's attention
Mar. 28 at 5:06 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2021
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 2,278
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
The buyout in year three is pretty rough no? As a general rule I’m not estatic about taking a cap dump over two years, so if that truly is how the rangers will approach that problem I wish them the best of luck.


The highest cap hit of the buy-out happens when Panarin and Trouba come off the books

It’s a very buy-out friendly contract and a no brainer move
Mar. 28 at 5:17 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 6,269
Likes: 2,534
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
The buyout in year three is pretty rough no? As a general rule I’m not estatic about taking a cap dump over two years, so if that truly is how the rangers will approach that problem I wish them the best of luck.


In year 3 we no longer have Bread or Trouba on contract so that’s 20M plus the cap will steadily be going up 4m+ so I’m not really concerned with a year of 3M dead cap
Mar. 28 at 5:20 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2023
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 1,451
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
You underestimate the value of flexibility, 6 year buyout at this structure is somewhat limiting especially in the year his cap hit is ~3.5.

Also, I hate to break it to you, but neither your opinion nor mine makes a difference to any executive at the NHL level. Judging by your aggressive style of replying I think you are missing the point of posting on this forum, or at least deriving some sort of pleasure from attempting to put others down. In any case, you are now added to the ignore list not because you shared an opinion on the post, but because you seem like a generally unpleasant person.


LOL. Oh no.
Mar. 28 at 5:47 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2024
Posts: 404
Likes: 176
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
You underestimate the value of flexibility, 6 year buyout at this structure is somewhat limiting especially in the year his cap hit is ~3.5.

The Rangers could easily trade him with 50% retention knocking his cap hit down to $1,820,834 and even give a 3rd team a 4th or 5th round pick to withhold half more making his cap hit $910,417. Plenty of teams would take that and run.

Or, they could buy him out and here are the numbers:

Year 1 - They gain $247,222 in cap room
Year 2 - Cap hit is $1,002,778 or 1.1% of the cap which will probably be $91.5 million +/- by then
Year 3 - Cap hit is $3,502,778 or 3.8% of cap if it doesn't go up
Years 4 - 6 Cap hit is $1,111,111 or 1.1% of cap if it doesn't go up

The Rangers have no other dead money so a Goodrow buy out would have minimal impact on their cap situation and flexibility and would not be limiting at all.

Either option is way better than your proposal of giving up a 1st round pick to trade him.
Mar. 28 at 7:39 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2020
Posts: 916
Likes: 525
You know what, sure

The pick is not only next year, but can go as far down as 2027. a 3rd round pick will most likely not even make the show. Lee does have value but the islanders would need to either retain or take back at least 2 million for him not to be a cap dump imo

And with a core of Romanov, Horvat, Sorokin, Barzal, and Dobson even if the pick goes to 2027 I put good money they can be a playoff team by that point
Kyle_Davidson liked this.
Mar. 29 at 10:09 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,287
Likes: 4,932
The goodrow buyout makes a lot more sense than that NYR trade
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll