SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

How he will cost

Team: 2024-25 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 3, 2024
Published: May 3, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
CHI
OTT
  1. Murphy, Connor ($2,200,000 retained)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CHI
2025
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2026
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
14$83,500,000$51,660,000$0$6,250,000$31,840,000
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$900,000$900K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$912,500$912,500 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,600,000$4,600,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$9,500,000$9,500,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,250,000$4,250,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$962,500$962,500
G
RFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 3 at 11:51 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 3,463
a 2nd probably, with retention
May 3 at 11:59 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,305
Likes: 9,762
Quoting: Ennis
a 2nd probably, with retention


not enough, especially with retention. With retention (2) 2nds. He's a very good locker room guy, works extremely hard off the ice, and good role model. Other teams may not value that as much but a rebuilding team does
Garak and Snowhawk18 liked this.
May 4 at 12:05 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2022
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 3,463
Quoting: ChiHawk
not enough, especially with retention. With retention (2) 2nds. He's a very good locker room guy, works extremely hard off the ice, and good role model. Other teams may not value that as much but a rebuilding team does


it's a steep price for a lesser tanev. i know chicago fans on CF LOVE to place their guys at a high price but id be shocked if thats what he went for
May 4 at 12:11 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,305
Likes: 9,762
Quoting: Ennis
it's a steep price for a lesser tanev. i know chicago fans on CF LOVE to place their guys at a high price but id be shocked if thats what he went for


It's not that, it's understanding the value to the Hawks and knowing he's not on the market. If a team wants to pry him away, it's going to take more. Maybe at next season's TDL or a year from this summer, but right now, it's going to take (2) 2nds or a 2nd a good prospect to get him with retention based on on insider reports that the Hawks are not shopping him and have no interest in trading him.
Garak and Snowhawk18 liked this.
May 4 at 12:57 a.m.
#5
Blackhawks
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 85
Likes: 146
I know he’s had an off year, but Murphy is still a top 4 defensive dman. Getting that for 2 years @ $2.2 a year (and the hawks needing to retain) will likely cost a 1st round pick. See the McCabe trade with Toronto a couple years ago for comparison
Hawksguy81, Garak, Snowhawk18 and 1 other person liked this.
May 4 at 8:39 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2022
Posts: 9,133
Likes: 11,107
Quoting: Ennis
it's a steep price for a lesser tanev. i know chicago fans on CF LOVE to place their guys at a high price but id be shocked if thats what he went for


The retention alone would cost the Sens a 2nd. Still gotta pay for Murphy after that. A 2nd might get him without retention. Add to that the Hawks aren't looking to move Murphy. Moving him creates a hole both on the ice and in the room for a team that wants to get better this season. With retention, it's a 1st or the Hawks just pass.
Garak, Snowhawk18, SociallyHawkward and 2 others liked this.
May 4 at 8:45 a.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,368
Likes: 11,366
Quoting: Ennis
it's a steep price for a lesser tanev. i know chicago fans on CF LOVE to place their guys at a high price but id be shocked if thats what he went for


That's dumb. CHI fans are easily one of the most reasonable fanbases on this website, and I'm not just saying that because I am one, it is because I have experienced it. 'Market value' and 'the value he has to CHI's rebuild' are two entirely different things. If you don't understand why, that just sounds like you have no critical thinking skills.
ChiHawk liked this.
May 4 at 9:21 a.m.
#8
Snowhawk
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 3,698
Quoting: Ennis
it's a steep price for a lesser tanev. i know chicago fans on CF LOVE to place their guys at a high price but id be shocked if thats what he went for


At $2.2m he is also significantly cheaper than what Tanev will receive in FA.

Quoting: Hawksguy81
The retention alone would cost the Sens a 2nd. Still gotta pay for Murphy after that. A 2nd might get him without retention. Add to that the Hawks aren't looking to move Murphy. Moving him creates a hole both on the ice and in the room for a team that wants to get better this season. With retention, it's a 1st or the Hawks just pass.


My thoughts exactly, I have stated before that Murphy costs an early 2nd without retention, the price goes up if the Hawks retain. A 1st or 2 x 2nds or a 2nd and decent prospect.
Hawksguy81, SociallyHawkward, ChiHawk and 2 others liked this.
May 4 at 11:11 a.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 5,759
Likes: 6,078
Not to mention the fact that the hawks already have 8 2nd round picks in the next 3 drafts. I don't think a couple 2nds gets it done. They'd want a mid to late 1st.
Garak, Snowhawk18 and Patches liked this.
May 4 at 12:42 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 11,368
Likes: 11,366
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
Not to mention the fact that the hawks already have 8 2nd round picks in the next 3 drafts. I don't think a couple 2nds gets it done. They'd want a mid to late 1st.


^ ^ THIS ^ ^
Snowhawk18 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll