SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Back to the Playoffs

Created by: Digitalbooya06
Team: 2024-25 Minnesota Wild
Initial Creation Date: May 5, 2024
Published: May 6, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
2$3,750,000
Trades
1.
MIN
  1. Daws, Nico [RFA Rights]
  2. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Gustavsson, Filip
  2. 2024 1st round pick (MIN)
2.
CBJ
  1. Lambos, Carson
  2. Rossi, Marco
  3. 2024 1st round pick (NJD)
3.
MIN
  1. 2024 5th round pick (COL)
NJD
  1. Merrill, Jon
Additional Details:
To which ever team will take him
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MIN
2025
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
2026
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the MIN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$87,500,000$83,385,255$425,000$3,080,000$4,114,745
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$9,000,000$9,000,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$886,667$886,667 (Performance Bonus$475,000$475K)
LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,000,000$4,000,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW
RFA
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$861,667$861,667 (Performance Bonus$80,000$80K)
LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,100,000$2,100,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$4,125,000$4,125,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$775,000$775,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,450,000$2,450,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$918,333$918,333 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$7,575,000$7,575,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 6 at 4:29 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2021
Posts: 450
Likes: 285
Did you mean to put Zucc on the 4th line? Makes no sense for a player like him to get only eight minutes a night. As much as I do think Ohgren eventually ends up in the middle six, he might be one of those prospects that would be fine at least next season to get bottom six minutes when he’s in the league and then send him to Iowa as necessary.

I actually like the idea on the Gus trade a lot (NJ maybe adds a 5th round kicker, too) and then flipping that with Rossi for two guys who could be big pieces. Bravo
May 6 at 4:35 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2021
Posts: 823
Likes: 939
Jackets pass on that. Jiricek is too valuable to us to trade away for anything other than a young 1RD.
Viqsi, Digitalbooya06 and benjgc liked this.
May 6 at 4:36 p.m.
#3
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,961
Likes: 3,451
That's getting into "don't be absurd" territory for the Jackets. Marchenko's been amazing and we'd much rather keep him, and Jiricek is can't-afford-to-lose. Rossi would be a nice add, but, well, we've got a lot of good young centers as is; he'd be better than several of them, but it's not worth giving up those guys to get him. Meanwhile, Lambos plays on the wrong side and the pick is not helpful.
May 6 at 5:07 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 611
Quoting: CoolHandL
Did you mean to put Zucc on the 4th line? Makes no sense for a player like him to get only eight minutes a night. As much as I do think Ohgren eventually ends up in the middle six, he might be one of those prospects that would be fine at least next season to get bottom six minutes when he’s in the league and then send him to Iowa as necessary.

I actually like the idea on the Gus trade a lot (NJ maybe adds a 5th round kicker, too) and then flipping that with Rossi for two guys who could be big pieces. Bravo


Most of Zucc’s points come on the power play. He’d get top pp minutes, but substantially less even strength time. I believe Russo said that Zucc had 7 points for the entire year when Kaprizov was not on the ice with him. You could flip him and Johansson if necessary.
May 6 at 5:10 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Osiecki death stare
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 611
Quoting: Viqsi
That's getting into "don't be absurd" territory for the Jackets. Marchenko's been amazing and we'd much rather keep him, and Jiricek is can't-afford-to-lose. Rossi would be a nice add, but, well, we've got a lot of good young centers as is; he'd be better than several of them, but it's not worth giving up those guys to get him. Meanwhile, Lambos plays on the wrong side and the pick is not helpful.


The pick is the most valuable piece coming from Minnesota. Curious how a top 10 pick is not helpful. Are expectations that CBJ will make the playoffs next year?

I’m curious on Jiricek. He seems to be unhappy with how things are going. I totally understand not wanting to trade him, but I think there is some level of discontent. We might have to swing back around if he ever wants out.
May 6 at 5:39 p.m.
#6
mostly harmless
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 6,961
Likes: 3,451
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
The pick is the most valuable piece coming from Minnesota. Curious how a top 10 pick is not helpful.

Because we're largely finished with the "acquire lots of prospects" phase and are now into the "actually develop the kids you have" phase. Same reason we're not trading Jenner anytime soon.

Quoting: Digitalbooya06
I’m curious on Jiricek. He seems to be unhappy with how things are going. I totally understand not wanting to trade him, but I think there is some level of discontent. We might have to swing back around if he ever wants out.

The news of Jiricek's discontent has been grossly exaggerated to say the least. It's no more than literally any other prospect in any other market who was hoping not to go to the AHL. It's been blown out of proportion into something supposedly more than that entirely on the basis of "but something something Columbus".
Friendly_Cannon and benjgc liked this.
May 6 at 5:50 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2018
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 1,952
Quoting: Digitalbooya06
The pick is the most valuable piece coming from Minnesota. Curious how a top 10 pick is not helpful. Are expectations that CBJ will make the playoffs next year?

I’m curious on Jiricek. He seems to be unhappy with how things are going. I totally understand not wanting to trade him, but I think there is some level of discontent. We might have to swing back around if he ever wants out.


Expectations are to be competitive in 2-3 years. Jiricek was understandably frustrated, he dominated the AHL last year (and a lot of this year when he was down there), but was healthy scratched or demoted/promoted quickly for a stretch. He was frustrated about not playing, and it was aimed nearly entirely at the GM who no longer has a job with the team. He was an NHL regular at the end of the season.

The issue is, if we trade Jiricek, we don't have a suitable replacement or prospect of his caliber on the right side, and there aren't any available in this draft aside from maybe Levshunov, who's gone in the top-4. So no, a top-10 pick doesn't do a lot of good if it's at the expense of Jiricek.

Marchenko and Rossi are about the same age and produce about equally, so I'd call them equal value. We're set on the left side with Werenski here and Mateychuk on the way. We don't have anyone on the right aside from Severson and Gudbranson, so that coupled with no desire to move Marchenko makes this a quick no from Columbus.

Total value is pretty close in all likelihood, but it doesn't at all fit Columbus' needs.
squashmaple, Friendly_Cannon, Digitalbooya06 and 2 others liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll