SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

AGKH123

Member Since
Feb. 24, 2020
Forum Posts
5
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 24, 2020 at 1:12 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 24, 2020 at 1:28 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 24, 2020 at 1:49 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 22, 2020 at 6:42 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 22, 2020 at 12:35 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheJoeMan</b></div><div>Brendan Guhle has to pass through waivers and I feel like there's a good chance he gets claimed. Curran doesn't have to clear waivers and is completely unproven at this level so I would much rather he get parked in the minors or on the taxi squad in lieu of potentially losing Guhle (or Larsson for that matter). Welinski or Hakanpaa can chill out in San Diego until (if) we need them. I'm sick of losing young d-men that we've developed just to see them finally flourish with other teams. I'm not holding my breath that Curran is fit for this level. 31 year-old rookies don't happen on accident.</div></div>

Guhle hasnt proven anything, in fact he's proven he cant even beat out Larsson and Djoos for a roster spot. I doubt he gets claimed and if he does it isnt the end of the world. Curran is being paid 1M even if he's in the minors, That can't be overlooked and with the reduced income for an already low income team that is also paying Corey Perry 6.6M this season to not play for them, and Ryan Kesler I would be shocked if Curran isnt on the NHL roster, and he plays on the right side which none of Djoos, Larsson and Guhle do.

Curran has been great in europe and fits on the third pair, If Guhle had a long term spot moving forward with us he would have a spot no question. Between Larsson, Djoos, Guhle, Mahura, Thurn, Lacombe we're bound to lose at least one of them somehow. Guhle isnt an NHLer at this point and just because he's young doesnt mean he should be given a shot