SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

BStone67

Member Since
Nov. 13, 2016
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
291
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 19, 2017 at 8:52 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 19, 2017 at 2:40 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 15, 2017 at 4:41 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 12, 2017 at 2:51 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>goldie078</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BStone67</b></div><div>For the Atheltic, James Mirtle wrote an article about the Leafs current cap situation, and how they aren't in any trouble because of a few back doors in the NHL rules. Did you know you can use LTIR in the offseason? Bill Daley confirmed it and John Chayka used it last offseason. It's pretty interesting and you should give it a check.</div></div>

I didn't know LTIR could be used until Mirtle reported it, because it had never been reported before, but that doesn't change what I'm talking about. This is a different thing where every year there's a flood of players being sent down to the AHL before waivers kick in the day after training camp, and for the teams using LTIR a bunch coming back through re-entry waivers on the next day.</div></div>

The only reason I brought it up is because lately I've been seeing EVERYONE attacking the Leafs for being in cap hell, and want to bring light to the real situation.
My question though, is why would you waive Komarov - where he'll more than definitely be claimed - rather than trade him for something?
I also have problems with the lineup your icing. Rychel isn't ready for a lot of NHL action, possibly a limited role since there isn't a spot for him. The Leafs wouldn't spend 1 mill on Moore if he were gonna be an AHLer. Babcock and others have already stated they plan to keep Marner on the wing since they have depth at Center already. If this is just what you personally want, then you do you, cheers
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 5, 2017 at 9:31 a.m.
You know what you're talking about, and I respect that, but I fail to see how we need to be introduced so quickly.

You traded away JVR to get two UFAs with bad contracts to equal us getting A Nylander (which would never happen) and then turned Bozak over as part of a package deal for a young Dman so that we won't be hit with cap problems in the future, right? But why do we need to trade them before THEIR contracts expire at the end of the year? I'm under the impression that, barring a trade using JVR or Bozak to shore up the D on the right side, Leaf Management is going to run with them for the season and make the hard decisions next year, and as a Leaf fan who's talked to many Leaf fans, we know they'll more than likely be gone at the end of the year and it's hard to accept but it's for the future. I just don't see why we would jump the gun and trade them for things we don't need and weaken the team now when we're in the unique window we're in.

For the Buffalo trade, you're suggesting that the Leafs make a divisional trade, and it's not a very good or understandable trade. The Sabres are more than likely going to hang onto Gorges for the rest of the year and let him walk later, and possibly buyout Moulson if they need to at the end of the year. The idea that they'd need to trade both of them so badly they'd include possibly their best prospect and weaken *their* future pipeline is not a feasible one. The only way I see them moving a prospect to get rid of a bad contract is only if they move a less valuable prospect and a pick, and keep Nylander.
Yes, in your trade scenario, JVR is headed their way and they get a pretty solid LW who can put up good points, but that's when it doesn't make sense for the Leafs to make the trade, because aside from getting Nylander, who might do better under Babcock and playing with his brother, isn't tracking to be an absolute all-star in my opinion, and if he does become that with the Leafs, he'll cost more than JVR would have with the team and put the other contracts in jeopardy. In the end, that's not where the Leafs need help, and given Buffalo probably passes on the trade so that they can keep Nylander and have an even stronger future, and the only way I see them trading him is for defensive help.

The Oleksiak trade is something I can't even believe I have to clear up. I watched Oleksiak play junior and thought he was awesome cause he was so big. Now I look at a 6'7 defenseman, who even on a depleted defensive team like the Dallas Stars still has yet to play a full season. I look at his stats and I really see why. Yes, he's a big guy, but that's really about it. He's really not that great, and I refer you to go to look at hockey-reference.com to look at all the stats, and at the bottom you'll see players who share the same statistic trends as him, and I'll give you a preview, players like Trotman, Reese, Olsen, Janik and Cote share comparables with him and do you know what they all have in common? They're all fringe NHLers/failed NHLers. So no, I'm not trading my offensive defenseman who may struggle in his own zone some nights, plus my best faceoff guy AND one of our depth defensemen for a guy who probably won't make that big of an impact, and NO I'm not going to pay him 5 million dollars. I wouldn't mind Oleksiak on the team, he might do well under Babcock, but at the end of the day he's not worth what you say he's worth, and I don't think he ever will be.

Now, when it comes to the Kadri for Letang trade, you didn't address the injury and health issues plaguing Letang, and the jeopardy of his career. You also say that the Leafs can't keep Kadri, yet they signed him to this deal last year, giving him the money and term they did because he's practically a steal at that price and more than that he's locked up for a long time. Yes, it's possible in a few years that they could trade him, but with the unique position we're in right now and with the knowledge he just came off his first 30 goal season, I don't find it smart to trade him for an injury riddled player.
And also, if you're preparing the team for the hurt of a salary cap, why acquire a player who's worth 3 million more than Kadri is, and can't stay healthy?

After looking at the cap situation and running over different scenarios, granted the Leafs don't overspend on key players, then the team will have more than enough room to keep Kadri AND the core they've built. I see your little cap situation you created, but it's for nothing ultimately. If you look at the Leafs CURRENT roster and take it to 2019/2020, you'll see the team has players under contract that can be called up to fill holes (Bracco, Brooks, Grundstrom, Nielsen, Dermott and Liljegren, not to mention possibles like Korshkov and Woll) and cap space to sign Matthews, Marner, Nylander and Kapanen, plus some depth players, while also keeping players like Kadri, Brown, Hyman, Martin and Marleau, although you're tight to the cap. Given the way Marleau's contract was made, with him only being paid 1.25 million after the signing bonus in the final season, don't be surprised if he's turned over in the summer that year to a team that needs cheap help, which gives you 6.25 million more in cap space to sign some of these contracts to higher salaries or ensure you can bring the team back in the offseason. The team is fine right now.

You made all these trades to make the fans prepared, but we don't need to be. The management has already prepared the team to shed cap weight when it needs to.
JVR and Bozak expire after this season. Barring a trade, they'll stay with the team and leave in the offseason.
Gardiner expires before the 2019/2020 season, freeing up cap for them to sign some core contracts, and they have defensive depth in the prospects to replace him easily.
The team is fine as it is, except for the need of defensive help, which we'll more than likely tackle via a trade using JVR or Bozak or maybe even both, and granted it's a solid RHD coming back, then I'll be fine with that and the cap will be to.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 4, 2017 at 11:14 p.m.