DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
14
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Cham
Member Since
Mar. 7, 2017
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
2nd Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
130
Posts per Day
0.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 10, 2020 at 3:13 p.m.
Thread:
TDL firesale idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bhavikp27</b></div><div>Bruins decline. Studnicka is not available (he's our #1 prospect) and definitely not for a player who has one year left on his contract.</div></div>
Ig I didn’t realize he’s your no.1 but either way a. who would you give up or b. what if Saad agreed to an extension
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 7, 2020 at 1:17 a.m.
Thread:
Way too many LWs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Alfie11</b></div><div>RW is overrated, just run two guys on the left side</div></div>
“Woah” - Keanu Reeves
I mean honestly if we have positionless baseball and basketball why not hockey? “Goalie” tandem next year of crow and roboseabs.
Forum:
NHL Trades
Oct. 6, 2020 at 5:34 p.m.
Thread:
(MTL/CBJ) - Domi + 2020 3rd round pick for Anderson
It’s been wild to see Bergevin stockpile all these picks and slowly trade them away
Forum:
Tampa Bay Lightning
Oct. 6, 2020 at 1:15 a.m.
Thread:
Per Bob McKenzie
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Isles777</b></div><div>Full NMC - I don’t know why he’d waive it</div></div>
Potentially the same reason Hornqvist did, felt unwanted and said I’ll go play for someone who values me.
Forum:
Tampa Bay Lightning
Oct. 6, 2020 at 1:13 a.m.
Thread:
Per Bob McKenzie
I mean you just won a Stanley cup without him, if I were a Bolts fan I wouldn’t want him traded for sentimental reasons but it could make a lot of sense depending on what exactly the return is, especially if you want to keep all three of your big RFA’s
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 4:25 p.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>eVANder</b></div><div>Don't need to trade for Murphy. He's not a top 4 guy on a good team.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>eVANder</b></div><div>Murphy gives me flashbacks of Gudbranson. I'd hate to see it but we'll see.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Murphy is worth a mid/;ate first as well imo. I don't think the 2nd is nessicary</div></div>
You two can duke it out from here but I’ll add my two cents first: Demko for future considerations
Forum:
NHL Trades
Oct. 5, 2020 at 1:47 p.m.
Thread:
(MIN/SJS) - Donato for 2021 3rd round pick (PIT)
He’s 24, has played one full (pandemic shortened) season, and has gotten better every year. Why would this be a player you move out?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 10:41 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>gave up too much for Demko</div></div>
Even a 2nd plus Murphy is too much?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 9:35 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>eVANder</b></div><div>Vancouver can't afford to resign Markstrom. He's more than likely going to free agency. If we do resign him, we have a year to move Demko before the expansion draft. If Van cant resign Tanev then we can't take on murphy's contract either. Lots of D in free agency too. Don't need to trade for Murphy. He's not a top 4 guy on a good team.</div></div>
See if I was Jim Benning I’d keep Toffoli and Tanev and let Markstrom walk, Jim Benning however is an entirely different person who according to Friedman has resigning Markstrom as his no. 1 priority. If Murphy doesn’t work the value still does and it can either become a 3 way trade with someone like TOR who needs a RHD desperately or another piece is moved.
And once again this year or next you’ll get a similar return on Demko. Maybe you’d get another 3rd if you waited but why not let DiPietro get NHL minutes if he’s finally ready (which Benning has thought he is for two years considering he inexplicably gets lit up from time to time when he gets put in an NHL game).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 9:26 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>Zach smith and this year's third for erne or futures</div></div>
I was about to make it a 3rd when I originally did this trade but seeing that Marc Staal only fetched a 2nd for a far worse contract I don’t see how Detroit gets a 3rd.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 9:16 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMs</b></div><div>Because we don’t know where that 2021 3rd rounder will be, he might trade it, maybe not. No need to trade it right now</div></div>
Hence the extra asset you’re receiving. I think the only way Bergevin doesn’t do this is if he’s trying to offer sheet Sergachev and doesn’t want to compete with the hawks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 9:13 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>eVANder</b></div><div>Vancouver declines. We'd rather keep Tanev then trade for Murphy and Demko is not going anywhere right now.</div></div>
I partly agree that Demko won’t go anywhere rn but he’ll be moved at some point if Markstrom is resigned and so whether it’s now or in a year he’ll get moved and that’s likely the return. If he’s moved next year (cause his contracts up and you’ll be needing every dollar you can get for Petterson and Hughes) the hawks stick with crow for a year and then bring in Demko to be the starter rather than the backup for a year.
tl;dr - Demkos traded eventually with a similar return
If you can’t keep Tanev cause he asks for money you don’t have then Murphy should look pretty enticing, especially if the hawks can retain salary.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 9:06 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>If Demko goes anywhere it'll be Detroit, And noway Sergachev signs that offer sheet.</div></div>
Lmao why would Detroit be the only place he goes DiehardRedWingsFan58?
Oh and also maybe he’d want shorter term (3 years to resign when the cap goes up) but he’s not getting that money or 1st pair minutes in Tampa
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 2:37 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Selling way low on Kampf (he's worth a 3rd defensively amazing 4C) and there is no reason we should be selling him.</div></div>
I’ve just always been low on him and I know I’ve traded him for a fifth on here before and people have said he’s not worth it so idk what to say. That being said I think bowman’s high on him and probably won’t move him, I just did cause I like Carpenter and Highmore more.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 2:33 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMs</b></div><div>MTL won’t do that</div></div>
Uh why?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 5, 2020 at 2:33 a.m.
Thread:
Sergachev and Demko
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Beetlejuice</b></div><div>Chicago has no interest in the Demko trade</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Thatcher isn't worth both Murphy and the #17OA, I wouldn't give up the #17OA for him let alone including murphy</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Breadmanhawks</b></div><div>Demko trade is overpayment though</div></div>
I guess I way overvalued Demko but I adjusted it for a second plus Murphy which now thinking more about it seems like fair value to me and fills needs for each team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 4, 2020 at 3:27 a.m.
Thread:
Revamped
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Don't see Bobby Ryan coming to Calgary, apparently he wants to play in Philly but I think he would have no issue taking a league min deal in Tampa over a 2.4M deal in Calgary. Remember he is still being paid from the buyout. Same thing with Maroon, if he's taking another sub 1M contract it is likely to reup with Tampa.
DeMelo is not needed if you are signing Barrie, one of Kylington, Valimaki, or Stone would just play that right side. With that extra cap space I would hope it is spent on someone like Markstrom.
I'm not against signing Barrie but at the same time I'm not entirely for it either.</div></div>
I guess I kind of overlooked that Bobby Ryan rumor but if there’s any way that he’d play in Calgary I think he’d be a perfect way to add skill to the bottom 6 to balance out Lucic and potentially help Bennett’s regular season production.
I’m with you that Maroon probably makes around 1.25-1.5 this off-season because he will have suitors but maybe he just wants to say **** you to Edmonton and/or sees the Flames as a good fit/situation, but otherwise there should be other depth options, whether internal or UFA.
My reasoning behind DeMelo was that in the defensive zone he should outplay his contract and if Barrie is the big FA signing then you need to make sure that there’s solid defensive options in the lineup for PK and defensive zone draws, and DeMelo would be cheaper than Brodie or Hamonic, while also being an anchor for Valimaki or Hanifin.
I can see where your coming from with wanting to go after a better goalie but I’m one of the people who believes that goalies aren’t as important as skaters and you can win with a 1b type goalie. An option to upgrade without losing much cap space would be trading for someone like Kuemper (either move out Rittich for a cheaper backup or get a third team to retain salary) or Korpisalo if they’re moved, and both of those specific teams have said they want to recoup picks which would make a trade easier for a flames team that needs to keep as many pieces as possible on the current roster.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2020 at 10:09 p.m.
Thread:
Krug Korpi and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafs_and_Sens_Fan</b></div><div>Ottawa rejects. Zaitsev would need to be going back the other way.
Switch out Saad for picks.</div></div>
I agree with you that the only way we'd see a Seabrook to Ottawa trade irl is if Zaitsev or Ryan comes back so take that as you will. Saad was traded with retained salary so that you could flip him at 1.5M for a better package than the hawks would've given you.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2020 at 10:07 p.m.
Thread:
Krug Korpi and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Specmence</b></div><div>I don't think we'll trade Korpi for the sake of trading him. He's cheap and we don't have an issue with the expansion draft as Elvis is exempt. If we can get help in the top-6 then we'll consider it.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NickC1988</b></div><div>Agreed, this deal does nothing for columbus, they definitely decline.</div></div>
I know that you wouldn't trade him for the sake of trading him but that isn't what this is or necessarily what Jarmo will do. I've seen multiple reports and articles saying that Korpi may be traded bc the Jackets org. is higher on Elvis and you guys have three good goalie prospects. If he along with Josh Anderson and others are moved it looks like it's either for scoring help or to recoup picks/prospects you've lost from last years deadline.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2020 at 4:54 p.m.
Thread:
Krug Korpi and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jah1722</b></div><div>There’s almost zero chance anyone takes on Seabrook contract with it being a flat cap with minimal rise for the foreseeable future. 4 years is too long. If he ends up not playing again then there could be takers.</div></div>
I think that possibility is enough for a team to take a chance on the futures and a bad contract that they potentially don't have to worry about in a year, The bad thing about it is that the earliest that his contract could come permanently off the cap from LTIR would be during next season and the hawks would be able to eat the salary, but wouldn't be able to make the signings prior to him going on LTIR. It's really just wishful thinking on my part.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2020 at 4:44 p.m.
Thread:
Krug Korpi and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nhl_oilers</b></div><div>Seriously? That much to get rid of a contract? That’s too much you are giving. It wouldn’t take a second liner, 3rd liner, and a 1st. Especially on a team that has the cap, and is rebuilding so they don’t need the cap.</div></div>
From a Hawks fan POV Saad is going to walk in a year, Nylander I've seen enough of especially come playoff time, and this team is built to be good enough next year to be giving up the roughly 20th OA pick
From a Sens fan POV Seabs third or fourth year they'll likely need the cap space to resign their young guys coming off ELC's not to mention that Melnyk is extremely cheap.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2020 at 4:41 p.m.
Thread:
Krug Korpi and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BorisBagel</b></div><div>Habs don't have to move either, they have cap space to resign them both if they wish. Danault still has next season left on the current deal before UFA, Domi is RFA now.</div></div>
Domi just seems to me like he's getting moved from every report I've heard due to them needing to pay him 2C money to be on the 3rd line, and Danault said a few days ago that he doesn't want a strictly defensive role which Montreal has bottlenecked him into.
I don't disagree with you that they shouldn't move them and in that case, the hawks just find another suitor
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2020 at 4:38 p.m.
Thread:
Krug Korpi and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nhl_oilers</b></div><div>Ottawa takes that and runs! Lol</div></div>
And I'd be fine with moving all those pieces to get rid of Seabs contract so if the hawks could do it for cheaper then even better.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 30, 2020 at 4:37 p.m.
Thread:
Krug Korpi and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Timmah007</b></div><div>When have you ever seen a deal like that Ottawa one? Teams don’t do that</div></div>
Bad teams don't take on bad contracts for futures?
I've seen quite a few deals like this. (ex: Hossa a few years ago)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 27, 2020 at 5:43 a.m.
Thread:
Rough idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Alfie11</b></div><div>Ottawa is looking to take on cap dumps but only 1-2 year ones. Maximum 3 if we get super good value. Seabrook for 4 years is just too much term for our timeline, we can’t have 7mil dead cap in that 4th year. It would be bad in the third year but the fourth is just a dealbreaker so we’re not interested there sorry.</div></div>
Damn
I miss the old days when Florida Carolina and Arizona would just take on any bad contract for futures
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com