SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Connor_McJesus_97

The right to Wright
Member Since
Dec. 1, 2020
Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
2nd Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
874
Posts per Day
0.7
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 23 at 7:23 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 20 at 4:34 p.m.
Thread: Deadline
Rangers deal is good for both sides. Goodrow could be a trade target later on with 1-2 seasons left on contract. Goodrow was good in the playoffs for the Rags but his deal is still too hefty so they would love it.

Flames have no use of Duclair. So unless he is getting shipped elsewhere it ain't happening.

I think Deslauriers didn't get that contract just to get moved. He fits in well with the ''Broad street bullies'' stereotype Philly has as a rough city and as a rough hockey team with Torts. I think Lindblom didn't get let go off just for them to attain him once again.

Nashville could probably do that if they felt like they needed to add a young bottom 6 center. Sharks should love that deal.

Sharks gets the prospect and Leafs the established veteran. I think it makes sense with the Samsonov capdump. Tho Sharks are favoured in this deal.

Tampa deal is just some scraps but I'll say yes.

Oilers could do that but would we want to get rid off Lavoie? I don't think so. Add in Bourgault instead and add a Sharks 2025 4th pick and remove the Oilers pick.

Kunin is still quite young and adds depth. It makes sense for Jets I think.
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 3:52 p.m.
Thread: Oilers 202526
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheGreatBigMac</b></div><div>I think Bouch re-ups in 4 years for more, the cap will go up.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>lowblocksniper</b></div><div>Like BigMac said the cap goes up but, when the cap goes up so do contracts and the market and this in 2yrs time
Bouchard is at a PPG right now he's the lowest contract in the top10 D points, I don't see him doing a medium type deal, I think it's much more likely he goes for the 8yr Makar-esque deal
I could be wrong but, unless the Edmonton boys (McDavid, Draisaitl etc) see what's happening in TO and say they want to take slightly more team friendly deals (Maybe Leon agrees to take 12.5 like Connor has now and Connor promises to only takes 250k over Matthews or whoever is the top contract is at that time), Bouchard will definitely take 10+mil</div></div>

Unless Bouch becomes good defensively no way he is getting that! He is very good offensively but also gets boosted aswell. You cannot pay a d man 8-10m unless he either is E.Karlsson or can defens quite well. Bouch gotta show that first. Otherwise I would bridge 2x6.5 and then give the 8-10m deal
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 16 at 1:09 p.m.
Thread: Quiet Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dr_Invictus</b></div><div>What is Calgary getting for Lindholm in this scenario?</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SlickWilly</b></div><div>I'd imagine getting Lindholm double retained would be worth a pretty penny, but I havent been paying close enough attention to the Flames to be properly evaluating him. I'm more so in it here just to piggy back off of whatever deadline deals need a middle man to retain, so that's slightly out of the scope of this post</div></div>

Avs would love Lindholm but what can they really give up? I think a 75% retained Lindholm would cost you an A- prospect, a 1st and a decent/good roster player.

Girard is of course an interesting name that easily is expendable for the Avs. But what prospect do they really have? Or would 2 1’st work for Flames?

Otherwise: Lysell, Boston 2025 1st and DeBrusk could perhaps be something if Bruins go after Lindholm?

Lindholm would be so good for the Bruins!