SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Haanrngrsfn311

YeahKreidizzle
Member Since
May 21, 2015
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
Forum Posts
125
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 26, 2018 at 9:35 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 11, 2018 at 1:28 p.m.
Thread: Kovalchuk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Philu916</b></div><div>Truthfully I’d move Zucc or Kreider to EDM, rather Zucc since he’s 30 and will want long term. He’s a playmaker and would be perfect with McDavid or Draisatl. Think Vesey can get more than a 4th round pick, otherwise not worth trading him.</div></div>

I disagree, Zucc is the heart of this team and will be the captain come next season. When Kreider is on, he's an animal and is one of the best net front presences in the league. Additionally, he's under a team friendly contract for term whereas Namestnikov will likely get a deal around $5million. Namestnikov hasn't really shown much since he came over from Tampa (4 points in 19 games). I like Namestnikov, I just think that him, Spooner and Hayes are all very similar players. Hayes you 100000% re-sign and Spooner doesn't have as much value as Namestnikov in a trade, and will also be cheaper contract wise.
As for Vesey, as long as you get a mid-round pick for him I'm happy with it. He won't get you a 2nd so you're looking in the 3/4 range. Only other option is he's a 4th liner who rotates out.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 9, 2018 at 3:13 a.m.
Thread: All in for Dahlin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mattsteelenj</b></div><div>Overpaying for Dahlin also 5M for Kevin Hayes?!? He hasnt ever put up 20 goals or scored more than 50 points in a season. Also there's no way Kovalchuk wont get at least 4 mil. Grabner will get over 3M.</div></div>

I don't see this being too much of an overpayment. Dahlin is being regarded as a generational type of defenseman so it's going to take a lot to get him. I was thinking somewhere between McDonagh, Vesey, and a 1st and what I proposed here. As for Hayes, maybe a little under 5million but definitely over 4. Maybe 4.5 for Hayes and 4.25 for Miller or something along those lines. Grabner I just re-worked in another post for 3.33 but can see him getting around 3.5, most I'd consider would be 3.75 but nothing more than that. Yes, I probably low-balled Kovy
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 21, 2017 at 1:38 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 4, 2017 at 2:01 p.m.
Thread: Lias and Winnik
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>I think that is way to optimist for Andersson to be a regular next season. And Winnick is really a LWer.</div></div>

I'm uncertain about Andersson being a regular next year as well but with the lack of depth there I really think he makes the team. Is he an all-star rookie year? Of course not but I believe if he makes the team, he'll have respectable play/numbers for an 18 year old rookie in the NHL.

Yes Winnik is more of a winger but he CAN play Center if absolutely needed to, kinda like Pirri last year.

I also think that come the deadline, they'll make a deal with San Jose for Joe Thornton to team him up with his buddy Nash. This would push Andersson to the 4th line or in a rotation with Desharnais depending on their respective play. What do you think of something like that going down later on in the season?
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 15, 2017 at 6:46 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 12, 2017 at 2:31 p.m.
Thread: Good Enough For Palhal???????
What are you talking about I don't know math? In what way does this site show anything about knowing or not knowing math?? I don't think you understand how the NHL operates. Staal is still a decent defenseman. However, on a team like the NYR he will not get playing time because of the other players on the team. McDonagh, Shattenkirk, Skjei, and Smith are all clearly better than him because they are great players. DeAngelo they just gave up Stepan for so they'll give him every chance to play and Bereglazov has a KHL opt out clause so theyll give him every chance to succeed which means they'll cut Staal's ice time. He won't be happy in NY so he'll be willing to accept a trade to a team that still values him like the Avalanche who gave up THE MOST GOALS IN THE NHL LAST YEAR and don't even have 4 D-men on their roster.
Just don't comment on my posts anymore, you're a waste of time and energy. Just cuz you're bitter you've suffered your entire life does not mean that you know the ins and outs of the NHL.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 12, 2017 at 2:12 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 12, 2017 at 2:03 p.m.
Thread: Duchene for Hayes+
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Haanrngrsfn311. So you are so blinded being a Ranger fan. Teams aren't interested in mid range prospects....than want guys that can play in the NHL. You have to know Graves is very unlikely to play in the NHL and maybe even Halderson. Of course you conveniently ignored, Staal's NTC. I'm sure he would veto a trade to worse team in the league.
I'm not a big Duchene supporter and Hayes and something for Duchene makes sense. But please you trading AHLers and negative value Staal for also. Any GM even Sakic can spend 5.7m better on other player(s) than Staal. Sorry that's the reality of Staal's value.</div></div>

On a terrible Hartford Wolfpack team, Graves was a bright spot. He plays on the top pair in Hartford and won the hardest shot competition in the AHL. He has good value. Halverson was a 2nd round pick just 2 years ago and is highly ranked. Had a poor year last year on the Wolfpack team but that is to be expected with the way the overall team in front of him played. If not Halverson, take another goalie prospect. Rangers have plenty of them. Huska? Nell? Georgiev? Who do you want?

Also don't tell me Staal doesn't have value after Ron Hainsey got a 2nd round pick just last deadline. Or when Kris Russel fetched a 2nd rounder that could have turned into a 1st two years ago.