DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
2
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Joblow
Member Since
Jan. 23, 2022
Forum Posts
1730
Posts per Day
2.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan</b></div><div>If MTL would offer Hutson, Reinbacher, or Mailloux I think for sure there is a deal to be made there. I just assume they wouldn't deal those guys. I don't mind MTL trying to make a futures offer of Mesar + Beck + 1st or something along those lines. Adding Kyrou to the Habs next year with all the young talent coming up would put them in a good position to pursue the playoffs and get Josh Anderson out of the lineup certainly helps their odds here too lol.</div></div>
Hutson is off the table for sure, Mailloux or Reinbacher might become assets at some point especially if we draft another defensive players this upcoming draft. Kyrou would certainly be a nice addition for the Habs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>Maybe Harris could help Florida, but they could probably get him for a 3rd round pick, lundell is way more valuable.</div></div>
Problem is not Lundell play but cap space. Lundell on a bridge deal will be at least between 3-3.5 millions for 2 season. Florida have Montour, Reinhart, Bennet and Verhaege to resign the next 2 season along with 10 roster spot to fill. In my opinion Florida have a better chance at the cup in the next couple season with all these four players than with Lundell
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan</b></div><div>I agree there, just think anything else MTL has to offer wouldn’t entice STL. They are trying to get better and rebuild quickly.</div></div>
Mtl had probably one of the three best defensive prospects pool in the league and St Louis probably one of the worst with a aging dcore. There definitely something that could be work here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I think that the cap problem Carolina faces is exaggerated.
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/5082764
Florida will get a first-round draft pick plus a more useful player than Dvorak or Harris for Anton Lundell.</div></div>
Harris might be exactly the kind of players Florida would want. He is the more NHL reliable at this instant and for a cup contending team who don’t have room to develop players Harris could fit in right away in the top 6 and provide instant help at low cost. Jake Evans could be added along with the Jets first.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
PLD Kakko Necas and UFAs
Necas isn’t worth 4 first round pick, jesus lord have i miss something. There absolutely no team that will pay close to that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan</b></div><div>Kyrou is probably not worth his $8.125M cap hit as of right now but any trade the Blues make has to be more than a 3LHD and a mid first. Just not enough value to move a player of Kyrou’s caliber. I feel something around Newhook or Dach++ could get it done.</div></div>
Make absolutely no sense for Mtl to move Newhook or Dach. Mtl are looking to add offense not substract talent on nice contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Habs
Mtl isn’t spending this much for Necas. They won’t trade Mailloux away after the season he just got. Necas is not even a top line winger.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Another Rossi Idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Digitalbooya06</b></div><div>Nice to see the delusion is still strong in Montreal.</div></div>
You might not like it but that would be the ask. Guhle is a first pairing defenseman with elite defensive skill. There nothing delusional about asking for Boldy. What is delusional is to think that you could get a top pairing defenseman for midget forward.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Preds
There nothing realistic here. Roy and Reinbacher are blue chip prospect. Habs have absolutely no need for a 30 year old goalie.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 hours ago
Thread:
Another Rossi Idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Blazingbat11</b></div><div>I think Hughes and Gorton are fine with a mixture of type of players. Drafting Slafkovsky, trading for Dach (big players), but also drafting Hutson, trading for Newhook (smaller skilled guys). I think from a depth perspective (and I consider Rossi a depth middle 6 player), simply adding more offense should be the focus. Rossi would accomplish this imo, and would 100% help the 2nd PP unit and overall add secondary scoring.
But I agree adding some more grit at forward should still be a focus for MTL. There's not much coming through the system aside from F.Xhekaj and Tuch. Hopefully MTL can draft someone with some size with their 1st rd pick...*cough* Lindstrom *cough*....
EDIT: Another small component that could be a benefit for MTL with Rossi specifically. It adds another fellow Austrian that could help Reinbacher.</div></div>
I don’t argue with the fact that Rossi would be a better offensive option at the moment that what we currently have. I just think that adding him wouldn’t make Mtl a better team in the long stretch. You can’t win in the playof with 5-6 under 6 foot forward. If you look at the latest cup winner they all have size. That why i don’t think they will target players like Rossi.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 hours ago
Thread:
Another Rossi Idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Blazingbat11</b></div><div>I think it would depend on Hughes' plan for Newhook (keep him as a 3rd line Center, or a top 6 winger), and when they project their prospects like Beck, Mesar, or Kapanen to be pushing for roster spots.
A key focus for MTL is finding depth scoring. Apart from the Caufield - Suzuki - Slafkovsky line, there was almost literally no offense being generated. Having a healthy Dach back will do wonders to help with this, but adding someone like Rossi would be a solid move imo. Really depends on the cost.
Barron is probably the player MTL would want to dangle (along with draft picks), but doesn't look like what MIN would be looking for...If MIN is looking to add physicality, and would target someone that Habs probably don't want to give up (but could be realistically ok letting go), I think Struble would be a target. Guy is an absolute unit and built like a truck. Xhekaj would be an obvious other candidate, but he's pretty controversial on here lol.
Struble + WINs 2024 1st for Rossi? Not sure I like it as a Habs fan, but seems pretty fair market value if there are multiple teams bidding for Rossi.</div></div>
Rossi is a fine players, but in my opinion he is not a solution. You can’t win with a small team. Adding Rossi would be making stationary. I just think Rossi is not a target even if he is available. Gorton and Hugues put a lot of emphasis on getting bigger. To me it doesn’t make sense for MTL management. Maybe if Mtl acquire him then ship him in another trade. But that would be it. I don’t see Rossi playing for the Habs in a near futur.
I wouldn’t pay more than one of Struble, Harris or Barron and the first of Winnipeg.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 hours ago
Thread:
Another Rossi Idea
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Blazingbat11</b></div><div>I think you're correct in thinking Guhle would be a perfect partner for Faber. But there's ZERO chance MTL let him go for a Rossi package.
Habs would be looking at doing another Dach/Newhook type trade, and Rossi would be a good candidate / target for MTL. but we are talking moving draft picks here. Guhle is not for sale and should be considered an untouchable for MTL imo. So unless MIN would consider moving one of their untouchables, I don't see it happening.</div></div>
I doubt that Hugues target Rossi. They made it clear that they needed to get bigger up front on media day. Rossi is sure a good player but 0 physical.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 hours ago
Thread:
Another Rossi Idea
Any Guhle trade would start with Boldy. Habs don’t need another small forward. Picks and prospect would need to be involved but that the only player that could interest Mtl.
Rossi is a good players but just not interesting for Mtl already small forward group.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 8:48 p.m.
Thread:
Making this team faster
Mtl won’t gave Struble away. They already have a boat load of pick, unless they don’t get something they value they won’t make this trade.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 1:50 p.m.
Thread:
Move up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>Anaheim is rebuilding.
Colorado went roster player for roster player.
The Sabres have needs but trading players who have already cemented themselves into roles on the team does not make sense which is what is happening here. They are also ready to compete now so trading those roster players for futures doesn't make sense. They should be doing the opposite.</div></div>
How Quinn have cimented himself as a top 6 winger. He have 104 games pf experience. He suffer injuries this season and had a ok rookie season. Yes he show a lot of promises but cimented himself is maybe a big statement.
It make sense if you move a surplus to fix a need. We get it you don’t want to move Quinn. Ultimately there decision that need to be taken in a upcoming futur because there not enough roster spot for potential NHl top 9 forward. The same could be said for Mtl and their Defensive squad. It will happen at some point for both team if not they will lose assets when players need to go thru waivers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:58 p.m.
Thread:
Move up
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojme</b></div><div>Quinn is not a prospect. Why would the Sabres trade top six forwards for more prospects???????</div></div>
Never said once that Quinn was a prospect.
Why Anaheim traded Drysdale for a prospect?
Why Colorado gave up Byram ?
Why team make trade?
To fill a need. Buffalo can keep all their current you g forward and al’ their prospect the number of spot won’t change. They will need only 9 talented forward when they are ready to compete. Defensively there lot of room for improvement. I understand you don’t want to trade Quinn but trading up to secure a Levshunov is not a bad move considering that Buffalo have a extra deep forward group. At some point developing and standing still might not be enough, Adams will have to address the need and start shaping the roster he will want to start competing for the cup.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:38 p.m.
Thread:
Move up
I personally think if Buffalo would want to jump to 5if Levshunov is available it will take one of Quinn Or Peterka. No mather how piss off buffalo fan are this would be the cost. Value wise this trade is pin point i would say. Quinn haven’t established himself already but might have a higher ceiling then Peterka. Buffalo prospect pool are deep but they don’t have any Blue chip defender, so this make sense no mather what. Been over 10 seasons of missing playoff, maybe keeping all their prospect and developing is not the way to do thing. But i guess everyone won’t ever agree on trade proposition around here. I think you did a good job with understanding value and need for both team. Buffalo fan can continue to believe they have a good defender group but a team that ain’t the case.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 9:54 p.m.
Thread:
D for F
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FoxYou727</b></div><div>Don't hate it all things considered, I wouldn't do this since the best option for the islanders is to just wait it out and don't do anything stupid</div></div>
But Lou is the kind of guy’s who do stupid thing.
Islanders are in middle of nowhere. They need some fresh leg up front. They have a strong group on defense but definitely need to improve up front. With Patrick Roy being the bench i would be shock at all if Lou make something to improve is team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 9:45 p.m.
Thread:
marner
Even Brad Treviling wouldn’t call Hugues with this offer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 8:33 p.m.
Thread:
Sweet Victory
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MONSTER1974</b></div><div>That Guhle/Perfetti proposal is one of those deals where both fan bases say NO because they think their player is worth more than the other.
The deal almost makes sense. I just can’t see who plays 25ish min/g on the first pairing with Matheson if we deal Guhle.</div></div>
Guhle impact aren’t quantifiable with stats. He ain’t being move because you need this kind of defenseman to win. Guhle is a horse who can shutdown top opponents. Guhle will play 22-25 min a night. Perfetti will get 17-19 if he reach full potential. Guhle impact the game in much more aspect than Perfetti who absolutely need to put point if he want to stay in the line up. Perfetti skating is still a issue. We have Joshua Roy who is a very similar player. Both have high hockey IQ but they are both not fast skater. I love Perfetti since is OHL debut but top pairing defenseman are so hard to found you don’t trade them.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 3:25 p.m.
Thread:
Marner you are a Montreal Canadiens come win with us
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ShikamaruSmokesBlunts</b></div><div>Guhle and Beck make sense but Gallagher? Why would the Laffs want a guy like that?</div></div>
You mean a guy’s who is a perfect competitor, always in the critical spot, who always compete at the highest level he can giving is all on each shift, a ultimate leader. Yeah why does a Toronto would like to had this kind of players, wouldn’t fit the diva culture established. Maybe it’s time for
Toronto to pay the price it’s needed to win in playoffs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 3:21 p.m.
Thread:
Invisible trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>Add one of Slaf or Caufield</div></div>
No not happening. Mtl have a surplus of pick and defenseman. There absolutely mo chance they trade a young forward. Even with a extension in place Marner wnlt
Land any of these player. Make absolutely no sense for Mtl and make no sense for Toronto who definitely not need offense but to fix that **** hole defense that each year fall apart in the playoffs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mon. at 3:00 p.m.
Thread:
Invisible trade
Toronto won’t gave up Marner like candy at Halloween. He is a superstar players and a thru game changer. Mtl will need to gave up one premium assets along with some
Valuable stuff. Sam Dickinson from the London Knight is exactly the kind of player Toronto need. This would be a starting point. Mtl first round pick of 2024
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Mon. at 2:57 p.m.
Thread:
This Summer
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>No Josh Anderson...
Under strict orders</div></div>
Maybe they should have a Josh Anderson. Maybe Toronto would benefit having hard nose forechecking forward in playoff. Clearly this team lack caracter.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 10:46 p.m.
Thread:
Marner le mal aime
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Michaeli13</b></div><div>Reasonable trade for Marner I don't hate is as a Leaf's fan but he would never waive his NTC to be a Hab</div></div>
Of course he wouldn’t. If he waive is clause he will want out of the Canada circus. Leafs fan should calm down about Marner. He is a outstanding players. Tavares 11 millions deal have screwed everything. If i was Treliving i would keep Nylander, Matthews and Marner and wait for Tavares to get the **** out. Use that money to built a real defense. Also Keefe need to be replace. Maybe Babcock was a complete jackoff but i am 100% sure that Leafs would have won a couple of serie by now.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com