SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

SLAFSQUATCH

Member Since
Nov. 11, 2023
Forum Posts
165
Posts per Day
1.0
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 24 at 9:04 a.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lancebmx</b></div><div>I looked at your other one, which you labelled as "too much". It's not that it's not enough, in its just not the right pieces. Anaheim won't want, if there was a desire to trade him, mid pieces. They would want a high-end piece coming back. Think of Reinbacher, 2024 1st + something else, Slaf. Those are what Anaheim would be after. Think of the Gauthier trade, they sent a high end piece in Drysdale.
Josh Anderson, even at that retention, doesn't have any value and probably even less so to Anaheim. Have to remember that each team would value players differently depending on where they are at.<strong> Anderson has less than zero value to Anaheim at 50% retained. </strong>
Farrell doesn't have any value, likely not going to be a NHL player. Also not a player Anaheim would want either way.
Barron has a bit of a value, maybe a 2nd. He's the type of player you could package with your 2024 1st.
Winnipeg's 1st, Mesar, Beck all are mid type of pieces. Anaheim, like alot of teams rebuilding, have a bunch of pieces like that.
If you want a high quality player, you have to offer something of high quality in return, not just a bunch of mid stuff. Ask yourself if you would trade Caufield for that package and if you say no, that's probably your answer.</div></div>

Anderson, at 50% retained. Has value to every single team in the league.

I'm really starting to question Duck fans.

I understand the need to get max value for Zegras. But, is he not simply a skilled 65 point wing that lacks 200 foot game?

And yes. If somehow Caufield was somehow in trade rumours and deemed expendable. A late 1st Beck/Mesar/Baron would look pretty good as a potential return.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 24 at 8:33 a.m.
Forum: NHL SigningsApr. 23 at 10:13 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 22 at 11:47 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 20 at 9:38 p.m.