Avatar

TheOtherAuston

Member Since
Dec. 8, 2019
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
1872
Posts per Day
1.9
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 29 at 12:32 p.m.
Thread: So this is apparently a thing now
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dev17</b></div><div>Good luck with signing laf miller kratsov and a 4th line. Still think Kakko gets offersheeted or traded as well</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Riley816</b></div><div>Schneider and a late 1st isn't a bad price,

Dubois signing for 7 years sounds like a problem. Either he really wants out of Winnepeg and/or he really wants to go to Montreal. Talking about testing ufa in 2 years.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tsyls</b></div><div>If I’m the jets I’m accepting that deal. I really like Schneider and think Chytil will be a solid contributor at C, and fills the holes potentially left by stastny and Dubois.

I just want to know what’s going on with the PLD contract situation. Does he really want to test FA in 2 years? Is this a tactic to get more money? Does he just want out of Winnipeg? All of these are questions I wish I had the answer to.</div></div>

So to elaborate this trade rumor caught me completely off guard because I have no idea what the Rangers plan for PLD would be in the long term. I threw this together in a matter of minutes. This would be a pitiful decision for New York
Forum: NHL SigningsJul. 31, 2021 at 10:59 a.m.
Thread: Toronto Maple Leafs signed Nick Ritchie (2 Years / $2,500,000 AAV)
Solid bet. AAV is high enough it's not a steal, but Ritchie is a decent physical player with the ability to score some goals. He takes too many penalties, but as long as even up calls are a real thing in the NHL, I don't think it harms his value as much as it's given credit for in most analytics model (different models seem to weight it differently).

I think Tatar is a better player, but likely costs what Toronto paid for Kase and Ritchie combined. Nice thing about splitting it is that it's easier to manage from a cap perspective, and there is a chance both deliver their full value, and less of a chance of missing completely on both.

Toronto isn't having as bad a summer as some think, but it really depends on how you rate their current group. If you look at last season on it's own, the Leafs were much better defensively, still strong offensively, very strong analytically, and really outplayed Montreal but ran into an extremely hot goalie. Toronto looked better against Montreal than Vegas did. Other top teams took more of a step back than Toronto did, and they did make some nice bets to counter one of their biggest weaknesses last year, which was depth scoring. It's fine for fans to overreact, it's why we watch sports, but I am glad management isn't. It's actually refreshing to see a GM with some conviction when on the hot seat. No big changes just for the sake of it, no mortgaging the entire future to save a job. Most GMs enter this sort of season with a swing for the fences mentality, knowing that if they gamble and win, they look good, but if they lose, it won't be their problem. If Dubas doesn't make it to next season, someone new won't really inherit a big mess of an organization with newly added bad contracts and lost assets to terrible desperation trades.

This isn't to say he's made no mistakes, there are plenty of good and bad moves, but it's nice to see he had a plan, and he's willing to just stick to it and either prove that it can work, or get fired if it doesn't.
×