DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
V1NnY2
V1NnY2
Member Since
Jul. 10, 2018
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
363
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 9:25 p.m.
Thread:
Canes
As a Habs fan, I’m telling you you still have time to delete this…
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Yesterday at 9:23 p.m.
Thread:
Habs
Xhekaj needs to play at least one full year in the NHL before even thinking about touching this amount of money.
Divide the AAV by 2 and then maybe it makes sense for both the player and the club.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 10:40 a.m.
Thread:
If Minnesota wanted to move from 13OA to 5OA on Draft-Day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habs_trade_churner_50</b></div><div>We have way too many (young) dmen</div></div>
Agreed, but I’d target someone else than a 5’9” F
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 10:29 a.m.
Thread:
If Minnesota wanted to move from 13OA to 5OA on Draft-Day
I don’t see why MTL would do this instead of picking at 5.. if the Habs want to add another diminutive forward, might as well draft Catton at 5 and keep the young Ds
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 10:31 p.m.
Thread:
Rossi and who I would draft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>Go to puckpedia, use their pick value calc for 5th and click "find fair trade" it will tell you that 5 = 18th + 19th but that is about 10 points low so to even it up you have to hit find next fair trade. It will then add pick 35 and balance the trade points. After that go search 2022 nhl redraft and see where the analysts rank Beck (elite prospects ranked him 23rd in June of 2023, and the athletic ranked him 29th in October of 2023) given that his stock has risen even since then, he is absolutely worth about 18th-20th now. These aren't "Habs fans delusions" these are based off actual analysts that scouted and kept tract of these prospects since the draft and a calculator on one of the most well respected hockey sites on the planet. You my friend are the biased "delusional" one since you are basing your response solely on your own opinion.</div></div>
He shoots, he scores !
Waiting for the reply 👀
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Fri. at 7:30 a.m.
Thread:
Post Lottery
It’s just impossible to think that if Lindstrom, Iginla AND Catton are available at 5, the Habs would end up drafting a LHD which the position they need the least
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 5 at 11:12 a.m.
Thread:
Gamble on PLD
As a Habs fan, I’d love to see the Bruins waste their money like that !
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 4 at 7:28 p.m.
Thread:
Big offseason
Habs don’t need a 5’8’’ forward
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 11:15 p.m.
Thread:
Lindholm as a UFA target
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>I said many times last year that Conroy should have been fired on the spot for offering Lindholm close to $70m on the extension. Lindholm is a nice player. Maybe at his peak a low end 1C. He was never elite and his game is extremely physical so any age decline- like we might be seeing right now- and he will collapse. Much like most forwards with that type of game. He's been an average 3C this season, but someone will give him term if he wants it. Guessing at minimum he can get five years and $25m. But I stand by if he signed a short term deal, he's taking a prohibitive NTC or full NMC that will potentially eliminate most trade options.</div></div>
I also think that’s pretty much what he can get on the market this summer. So, if I were him, I’d bet on myself and take the 7.5M$ short term deal and maybe be able to sign a better long term deal than 5x5 after that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 11:12 p.m.
Thread:
Lindholm as a UFA target
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Prove it deal??? He'll be near 30 years of age when the season starts. If teams don't know what he is....</div></div>
44 points this year…
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 10:41 p.m.
Thread:
Lindholm as a UFA target
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>Lindholm isn't going to sign that. And I'll bet if he ever did a short-term contract he would make a full no movement clause to control any movement anyway so any notions of flipping him for a great return would end up like Tarasenko.</div></div>
Of course there would be some sort of NTC or NMC involved in such a deal. But it’s easy to say he won’t sign that and not say what else he would sign… curious to see your prediction with the year he just had..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 10:38 p.m.
Thread:
Lindholm as a UFA target
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Lindholm will want more long term security than that. He's about the only above average UFA centre available. Now make 10m for one year, maybe Lindholm bites.</div></div>
Of course he’ll want a long-term deal, but with the year he just had, I don’t expect teams to be lining up to give him a 6-7 year deal.. unless the cap hit is extremely reasonable. Which is why I think there a possibility that he accepts a one-year, prove yourself type of deal to hopefully raise his market value and sign a more interesting long-term deal next offseason.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2 at 9:18 p.m.
Thread:
Lindholm as a UFA target
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pmbrouillard</b></div><div>for a year plus a 1st rounder at the tdl, yes</div></div>
That’s the spirit !
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 10 at 2:07 p.m.
Thread:
Picking 8
Value’s close but RD isn’t a need for the Devils.. maybe a LD to upgrade on Bahl
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 6:36 p.m.
Thread:
Euro Itchy and Scratchy land open for business
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>I wanna hold Armia until next TDL. Something is different and I wanna see if he can find a second wind.</div></div>
Even if he has a good season next year, he won’t resign in MTL after next year.
I’d rather get rid of him and leave more ice time for Roy, RHP, etc
With Anderson as a RW on the 3rd line and Gallagher on the 4th..until we get rid of them both!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 3:04 p.m.
Thread:
Euro Itchy and Scratchy land open for business
That pretty much sums it up. Maybe add Armia for anything/anywhere
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 2:59 p.m.
Thread:
Ready To Rumble
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stavros99</b></div><div>So be it, but that's probably the last chance you'll get at obtaining 1st rounder or anything of good value for him. That cap space sure must be valuable to a rebuilding team.</div></div>
Habs will have plenty of cap space next year and maybe the year after. I’d rather pay a high pick in 3 years to dump him than retain salary on him for 4 years for a late first
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 2:56 p.m.
Thread:
The Summer Shanny Went Crazy
Quantity over quality for Xhekaj - this doesn’t get it done
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 8:22 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUFF36</b></div><div>If I was to include Ostlund, I would need a pick back.</div></div>
In this case, I wouldn’t mind adding anything lower or equal than a 4th
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 8:16 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Joblow</b></div><div>Don’t get me wrong, i like Mittlestadt but he isn’t a top tier forward. He would be a nice addition to Mtl roster that for sure but not at the cost of a futur top righthanded defenseman. Buffalo didn’t even received a prospect of that caliber in the Eichel trade.
A late first and Logan Mailloux or Justin Barron would be much more a return to expect. Historically if you look at similar profile player in a similar position then Mittlestadt this is the return. Fiala deal is probably a great start to what the return would look like.
At the time of the trade Faber was a good prospect but he wasn’t a high profile prospect with the 19th overall pick. I think that this is what to expect in a trade for Mittlestadt.
As for Reinbacher, 5th overall pick aren’t traded a year after being traded. Unless you are talking about the top tier players.</div></div>
Very valid points here.
It’s funny you mention the Eichel trade as I did look into it before making this trade. Although he didn’t pan out, Krebs was ranked as a top-20 prospect in the league at the time and Tuch was a young top-6 power forward (plus 2 picks).
Here, for a lesser player in Mitts, the cost is virtually a top-30 prospect (since we could say Savard gets Krebs 1 vs 1).
I’d love it if the price was Barron and WPG’s first, but I’d be surprised to see BUF say yes to that (if they do, be my guest, I’d do it in a heartbeat).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 8:03 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUFF36</b></div><div>I just don't like giving 2 Centers at once when I am not positive if Kulich or Savoie will be ready. How close do you need the prospect to be, and does he have to be a Center</div></div>
I think it would have to be 2Cs (prime position for prime position). How about Ostlund?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:42 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Joblow</b></div><div>Reinbacher is untouchable unless they received a elite talent in return. That not the case here.</div></div>
Mitts has virtually the same numbers as Caufield this year and would have been second on the team in points last year by a mile. Is he a true elite/all-star caliber player? No. But is he a young quality top 6 player with decent size? Yes.
I’d be curious to see what you expect as a return in a legitimate offer for Reinbacher.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:35 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>Habs turned down better offers than this for Reinbacher, turned down Michkov, turned down 13th overall 22nd overall and Askarov AND turned down Cutter Gauthier for Reinbacher.
So this isn't particularly close to what they would be willing to accept</div></div>
The goal here is to find fair value in a trade. At the end of the day, you are right, GMs personal preferences can come into play, but who knows what really is in both GMs mind at any given time..
Players value fluctuate over time. I’m pretty sure NSH doesn’t make that offer today. As for Gauthier, it’s still and will always be a rumor…I think most experts would say Gauthier has a higher ceiling than Reinbacher.
The reason that triggered me to propose this trade is the recent rankings made by a few « experts ». Wheeler has Reinbacher at 25. Hockeywriters have him at 19. Stephane Leroux at 33. And so on..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:25 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MTLaveragefan</b></div><div>It's fair value... but I'm not sure the habs would pull the trigger on it so soon. IF you look at the pre-draft video, they see him as the prototypical top pairing RHD that help teams win a stanley cup.
Is he really (probably not)? it's too early to tell. but to pass on Michkov, they must have had a good reason.</div></div>
I agree they were pretty high on him (and are probably still) but players value evolve over time and so far Reinbacher’s stock isn’t trending up.
To me, this only becomes a possibility if the Habs are high on Levshunov and/or Parekh, end up drafting one of them, and they believe their ceiling is higher than Reinbacher.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 4 at 7:20 p.m.
Thread:
Blockbuster with BUF
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>You know you did something wrong when Buffalo fans accept your offer....
8 years of Reinbacher are worth way more than 4 years of Krebs. Not even close.</div></div>
In this trade, Mitts is the key piece coming over from BUF and not Krebs.. but yes, Reinbacher could end up being more valuable than Mitts. Just as Nazar could become more valuable than Dach…
If this were to happen, I’m thinking BUF might need to add a future piece, but judging from the comments, it seems pretty spot on in terms of fair value
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com