amullican

Member Since

Sep. 4, 2020

Favourite Team

Carolina Hurricanes

Forum Posts

167

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 16 at 11:50 a.m.

Thread: Moving up

If Necas signs that deal, it'll be with the Canes.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 6:09 p.m.

Thread: Sabres need to go big

Canes say no

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 15 at 5:48 p.m.

Thread: What I Could See the Canes Doing If Guentzel Walks

I'd rather trade that for Mario Ferraro instead

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 12 at 12:10 a.m.

Thread: Carolina Pt 2

What the **** is this

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 3:17 p.m.

Thread: Waddell Magic

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rob32sjsharks</b></div><div>I don’t know, with Hertl gone and Couture likely done for his career due to injury we maybe Sharks consider this.</div></div>

Damn, is Couture really done for his career?

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 8 at 4:08 p.m.

Thread: Can we get a redo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>Kuzy is one of the most toxic contracts in the league and we paid to even take 50% of it. and he has another year. It can be a lot worse than meh</div></div>

I agree. Would've liked it a lot better if Washington had given us a 3rd to take half his contract. The good news is Orlov is his best friend and we have Svech and Kochetkov too. Plus he has experience with Rod, Aho, and Guentzel from the all star game two years ago. He now has plenty of motivation to be the player he once was since apparently he didn't have any before.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 8 at 3:55 p.m.

Thread: Can we get a redo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>DW went to crap in this deadline</div></div>

The Kuzy trade is meh, but Hertl would've been infinitely better

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 8 at 3:52 p.m.

Thread: Can we get a redo

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ennis</b></div><div>Hertl instead of Kuznetsov would have been 10x better for this team</div></div>

As soon as I saw the Hertl trade, I fell to my knees in a Harris Teeter

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 3:39 p.m.

Thread: Just waived three players Get ready for it Carolina

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BDHockey</b></div><div>The only issue with that is that the Blues have plenty of forward prospects and are going to look at D if they are moving Buch at the Deadline. Otherwise they will wait until the offseason when there are more suitors.</div></div>

Heimosalmi is available

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 7 at 3:39 p.m.

Thread: Just waived three players Get ready for it Carolina

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Huge_Caniac_Abe_Lincoln</b></div><div>I think that with the term we have in our forward group, and lack of term on defense, the Canes should not trade either Morrow or Nikishin. I think that trading Nadeau and Blake (the two top forward prospects for the Canes) won't hurt the team as much long term while still offering valuable pieces. Carolina also doesn't need Buchnevich to be retained, they have plenty of deadline space, so take out the second? 1st, Blake, Nadeau for Buchnevich unretained maybe?</div></div>

I would say one of Blake or Nadeau and then one of someone like Ponomarev/Koivunen/Perron/etc plus the first

Edit: I would personally still hesitate at even this price. It's a lot for a pure rental. I don't think we should trade any of Nikishin, Morrow, Nadeau, or Blake

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 6 at 7:54 p.m.

Thread: Choose your unexciting deadline rental

I would like Reilly Smith pls

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 6 at 12:28 p.m.

Thread: Going crazy at the deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gpmack95</b></div><div>Id prefer Necas + Drury + 2nd for Guentzel retained and extended</div></div>

Lol I'm sure that you would but you're not getting that

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 5 at 12:02 p.m.

Thread: Targeting NHL ready prospects

I would do that for Tarasenko

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 5 at 11:42 a.m.

Thread: Based on Athletic per Rutherford and Goldman

Canes say no

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 3 at 12:30 p.m.

Thread: 3 way fun

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>We are paying for Broberg by paying for Chicago to take on ceci</div></div>

To me Broberg+2nd is the package for Pesce. We don't need to "pay extra" for Broberg by helping Edmonton get rid of Ceci. Idk it just feels like we're giving up the most in the trade and not quite getting equal value back. It's a creative idea though.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 3 at 12:10 p.m.

Thread: 3 way fun

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07</b></div><div>They are retaining on pesce, taking on ceci, and murphy has term</div></div>

Ceci is coming from Edmonton though, we shouldn't be the ones paying to get rid of him. Murphy does have term, but we're giving up Pesce, two prospects, a first, and 2nd and getting back Murphy, a 2nd, and Broberg. The value just doesn't seem to match up from a Carolina perspective.

Edit: I think Edmonton should be the ones paying to get rid of Ceci and for retention on Pesce not us.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 3 at 11:37 a.m.

Thread: 3 way fun

I feel like Chicago is getting more for Murphy than we are getting for Pesce. I get that Chicago is retaining for Pesce, but I would expect him to get more on the market than Murphy would. Maybe I'm thinking about the trade the wrong way idk?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 28 at 10:14 a.m.

Thread: Blockbuster

If the Canes wanted Ullmark, they would just trade for him and not downgrade on defense in the process

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 6:14 p.m.

Thread: Massive Pettersson package

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>He makes 4.8M for the next 6 years, is stuck on the 4th line, and doesn’t provide offense. You can get just as good or better players for your bottom 6 for much cheaper (example: Teddy Blueger)

Hertl in his 3rd season had more points than Kotkaniemi has had in any of his 6 seasons. Hertl in his 6th season had 74 points, while Kotkaniemi is on pace for 28 in his 6th season this year</div></div>

If you're going to compare seasons look at the age season that you're comparing so it's actually a good comparison. Their points pretty much match up from age 20 to 23 seasons.

Also Teddy Blueger has zero upside. KK still has tons of upside even after his sixth season. Teddy Blueger wasn't even in the NHL when he was 23 lol

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 5:40 p.m.

Thread: Massive Pettersson package

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Kotkaniemi has arguably negative value.</div></div>

Lol disagree

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 5:38 p.m.

Thread: Massive Pettersson package

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Krebs was a highly ranked prospect at the time of the trade. Definitely arguable he was more valuable than Morrow is currently or at worst the same value

KK is arguably a cap dump. He’s a 4.8M 4C. He has 5 points in his last 37 games. I would much rather have a 2nd round pick</div></div>

Lol KK is not a cap dump. Dude is only 23 years old, still has plenty of upside. He's struggling right now, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have value. His current trajectory is actually pretty similar to Tomas Hertl early in his career. Not saying KK will definitely turn it around like Hertl did, but it's possible that he could.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 5:24 p.m.

Thread: Massive Pettersson package

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Not really

Necas >/= Tuch
Morrow =/< Krebs (at the time Krebs was highly touted)
1st = 1st
KK << 2nd</div></div>

Necas is a lot better than Tuch was at the time of that trade and KK is worth more value than just a 2nd. Morrow is worth quite a bit more than Krebs.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 5:17 p.m.

Thread: Massive Pettersson package

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mv21227</b></div><div>Tkachuk returned a 115 point winger, a top pair dman, a 1st, and a prospect. Considering Pettersson is a center he arguably gets a better return. At worst the same

Eichel returned a top 6 winger, a top prospect, a 1st, and a 2nd despite needing major neck surgery. Considering Pettersson is better and doesn’t need neck surgery he gets a better return

So yes it’ll cost you more than Necas, KK, Morrow, and a late 1st. You don’t get a borderline top 5C/top 10 player for that</div></div>

Necas, KK, Morrow, and a 1st is better than what you just described that Eichel got

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15 at 12:59 p.m.

Thread: Reluctantly Saros

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SnipeRV</b></div><div>Are you calling Morrow a blue chip? He's 81st in THW's top 100. He's not even your best defense prospect? Another case of teams over valuing their prospects.</div></div>

He has the potential to be a top 2 defenseman for any team and people are describing him as "the next Adam Fox". I consider that a blue chip prospect. Sounds like you have an unrealistic definition for "blue chip". Nikishin is untouchable and Morrow is just about untouchable himself. You'd be lucky to get either one in a trade for Saros.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15 at 11:17 a.m.

Thread: Reluctantly Saros

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_92</b></div><div>Saros cost more than that. Especially since Trotz doesn’t wanna move him, you’ll have to drastically overpay and this is a sizeable underpay</div></div>

Disagree. It also seems to me like he does want to move Saros. This is already an overpay imo.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

amullican

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day