Edit Avatar

etpeck

Member Since

Aug 23, 2020

Favourite Team

Carolina Hurricanes

Birthday

May 22, 1997

Forum Posts

1129

Posts per Day

7.24

Forum Threads

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 12:29 pm

Thread: Gibson

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bhavikp27</b></div><div>Quality > quantity</div></div>

Where is there not quality in this offer? I personally think it would be an overpay by the canes, but that’s what it would take for Gibson. It’s 2 top prospects, 3 picks, a solid young player, and goalie to make money work

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 12 at 4:13

Thread: Hamilton

Canes wouldnt even consider that offer

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 9 at 3:47

Thread: New Kuemper Option

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockyluv21</b></div><div>Exactly. Because Kuemper is on a 2 year deal, the Canes will need to give in order to get. If we want to deal McGinn and a smaller pick, Raanta is perhaps the likelier outcome.</div></div>

I mean they are already getting a first round pick which is something that Arizona desperately needs. Foegele and a first is too rich for me.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 9 at 1:50

Thread: New Kuemper Option

not a bad idea, but i dont think foegele is the roster player that you move. I would rather see it be something like mcginn and a first. Foegele just provides a lot more offense

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 6 at 6:37

Thread: Laine most Id give up

This is a deal I would be ok with the canes doing. I’m pretty against trading necas but at the end of the day laine is the better player

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 6 at 6:33

Thread: idea

That’s not a bad offer to the canes. I think they would certainly consider it

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 5 at 7:53

Thread: trades

Canes decline. Slavin is pretty much untouchable

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 1 at 3:33

Thread: Laine

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Windjammer</b></div><div>Zero chance Laine is moved for a rental.</div></div>

I imagine the assumption is that dougie would come with a contact agreed with the jets

Forum: Armchair-GMJan 1 at 3:32

Thread: Gimme PLD

I think it’s an overpay for pld but u wouldn’t see me complain if the deal was made. Top 6 looks fantastic. The cap would be ugly tho in 2 years with necas and pld needing new deals

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 31, 2020 at 4:51

Thread: Trade and Barzal Signing

Don’t hate this deal from a canes perspective. Komarov isn’t a on a good contract but it’s less and a year shorter than Gardiner. The deal opens up a spot for bean in the lineup, while also being a little more physically to the canes lineup. I think the second is fair to balance out the deal

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 30, 2020 at 10:46

Thread: Potential Roslovic Swap

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>masterjuddi</b></div><div>Bean for Roslovic...done</div></div>

I would say it probably wouldn’t be straight up. My guess is the canes would value bean higher than roslovic so maybe add a mid round pick. Also op added the dzingle for cap reasons, and leaving him in the deal I think makes sense for both teams. At half retained he certainly would have value to the jets in a middle 6 role

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 30, 2020 at 10:12

Thread: Potential Roslovic Swap

I’d rather send Bean and not fleury. Fleury has a defined roster spot that bean can not fill. I really like bean and think he deserves a chance in the lineup, but I don’t see it happening without moving Gardiner.

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 29, 2020 at 11:18

Thread: Options for next year HALL and HAMILTON

The canes will not let Hamilton go to free agency that I can almost guarantee. The most likely scenario is that the canes resign Hamilton, both sides have expressed that they want to get a deal done. Carolina is the first place Hamilton has fit in, so I don’t see him wanting to go back to Canada. If the canes can’t sign Hamilton I see them moving him somewhere with an extension in place like they did with Faulk

Forum: Fauteuil - DGDec 28, 2020 at 11:51

Thread: JETS WINWIN

Value wise the canes do this I think. The cap I think they could make work, especially moving out skjei

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 27, 2020 at 5:34

Thread: CupCity

The white deal is a big gamble from a canes perspective. White has not lived up to the contract, but i think the talent is there. I think the canes might do it

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 26, 2020 at 10:02

Thread: welp

All of this is a no

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 25, 2020 at 2:01

Thread: Trading Andersen Is the Perfect XMAS Gift

Well it looks like ur not getting a present

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 25, 2020 at 1:51

Thread: Final Moves to Improve Secondary Scoring

This doesn’t make the canes better in any way

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 19, 2020 at 9:54

Thread: Jake Bean

The canes would want a forward prospect of similar quality to Bean. Bean is the canes top prospect and he is NHL ready, just stuck behind all the canes defenseman. So they would want a top forward prospect

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 19, 2020 at 9:53

Thread: Crazy Arizona trade

I like the idea I think the price is a bit steep tho with bokk and a first. I think either downgrade the prospect a bit or change the first to a 2nd and I’m on board

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 15, 2020 at 2:46

Thread: Next year

Canes decline

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 15, 2020 at 2:46

Thread: Cane

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Theozler</b></div><div>Was thinking Hoffman but didn’t have the cap room left.</div></div>

I Mean dzingle can certainly go to make more cap

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 15, 2020 at 1:59

Thread: Cane

As a canes fan I’d be good with both moves, however, I’m not sure either team agrees on those deals. Also I think I’d rather try and get Hoffman or granlund on a 1 year deal over a player like duclair

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 15, 2020 at 9:57

Thread: Leafs close comparables throughout the league

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Saskleaf</b></div><div>Just look at <a href="/users/Lyle_Bubas" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@Lyle_Bubas</a> 's chart again.</div></div>
Because charts tell you so much. You can look at the stats but it tells you nothing about style of play or opportunity. You are also comparing one player entering his prime and one who just finished his second season. I think you can compare them on goals and assists but that is as much of a comparison as you can make. What is clear is that point totals are the same, and svech is 4 years younger, that should be all that is needed

Forum: Armchair-GMDec 15, 2020 at 9:54

Thread: Leafs close comparables throughout the league

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ecupirate07 </b></div><div>Nylander with an inflated shooting percentage and more ice time didn’t outscore Svech this year. Svech is better</div></div>
What everyone also failed to take into account is the physical game svechnikov plays, something that Nylander doesn’t bring. You can make an argument based on point totals but you can’t make an argument based on style of play imo. You also have a big age difference and svech having limited opportunities compared to nylander.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

INTERACTIVE FEATURES