SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

pasha123

Member Since
Jan. 11, 2016
Forum Posts
279
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 7, 2021 at 1:07 a.m.
Thread: PHI Fans
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks33</b></div><div>Schmidt requested to go to Vancouver and Vegas had to move him quickly because they were over the cap by a lot after signing Pietrangelo. No other team had the opportunity to bid on Schmidt, otherwise the 3rd would have been a 1st+ pretty easily.</div></div>

I don't think Schmidt requested to go to Vancouver, where did you hear this? From his interviews he was blind sided by the trade as he asked McCrimmom if he was going to trade him, where the GM said no, then few days later he was moved. But after the trade several other GMs where surprised as they would have given more if they had known of his availability. Anyway as to the trade I think more would have to be given up. What, hard to say but it would have to be expanded with Gost coming back and another player F and pick going there. I don't see a fit with Philly for Konecny
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 7, 2021 at 12:50 a.m.
Thread: Gang on Foenem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MakeMarnerACentre</b></div><div>idc if its a 1st from vancouver that wasnt really the point of this thread. also your GM is Jim Benning , if Rielly were to go to Vancouver i bet dubas could talk him into A 1st+Hoglander lolololol</div></div>

Your GM is Dubas, Jim will gave him a 3rd round pick and tell him, he just saved him a 1st round exit and between 10.9 million and 11.7 million on the new Rielly contract rflol ... but seriously Van wouldn't give up a 1st for Rielly as he is not what the Canucks need. But the Leafs should be able to get a 1st + for him come tdl when the leafs could very likely be out of the playoffs in that tough Atlantic division. Hard to Pass Tampa, Florida, maybe Boston drops but somehow I doubt it, they play with more heart than the leafs. Then the Met division PENS, CAPS, NYI, NYR, PHI, CAR.
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2021 at 10:28 p.m.
Thread: Trying another different team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sporkknife</b></div><div>I also watch both teams. Canucks have plenty of Motte-like guys on the wing and need center depth. Motte is also quite injury prone. He is a great penalty killer. Overall I think he is only maybe a hair above Engvall. The Kerfoot for a 3rd thing, we can have that debate all day. See my other response in the thread.

"3rd line C... for less on the UFA market."

With Benning's track record, I just don't see it. Maybe Sutter for $2 million *throws up in mouth*</div></div>

Since the Canucks have that Motte type on wing why then trade him for a lesser wing player in Engvall, he'd be exposed and the Canucks protect Lind over him anyways.
Engvall doesn't really being much different for the Canucks.
Kerfoot, Engvall and Dermott most likely will be exposed with Seattle probably taking Dermott as he'd be a cheaper contract than Kerfoot and better get than Engvall. So it's Toronto trading Kerfoot for a 3rd and an upgrade on the wing in getting Motte. Good deal for them.
I do expect Jim to re-sign Sutter for the 4th C hopefully no more than 1.75. As for 3rd C well I don't know what he'd do, personally I'd rather have Goodrow, Nosek or Haula as 3 C over Kerfoot
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 27, 2021 at 10:27 p.m.
Thread: Trying another different team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sporkknife</b></div><div>I also watch both teams. Canucks have plenty of Motte-like guys on the wing and need center depth. Motte is also quite injury prone. He is a great penalty killer. Overall I think he is only maybe a hair above Engvall. The Kerfoot for a 3rd thing, we can have that debate all day. See my other response in the thread.

"3rd line C... for less on the UFA market."

With Benning's track record, I just don't see it. Maybe Sutter for $2 million *throws up in mouth*</div></div>

Since the Canucks have that Motte type on wing why then trade him for a lesser wing player in Engvall, he'd be exposed and the Canucks protect Lind over him anyways.
Engvall doesn't really bring much different for the Canucks.
Kerfoot, Engvall and Dermott most likely will be exposed with Seattle probably taking Dermott as he'd be a cheaper contract than Kerfoot and better get than Engvall. So it's Toronto trading Kerfoot for a 3rd and an upgrade on the wing in getting Motte. Good deal for them.
I do expect Jim to re-sign Sutter for the 4th C hopefully no more than 1.75. As for 3rd C well I don't know what he'd do, personally I'd rather have Goodrow, Nosek or Haula as 3 C over Kerfoot
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26, 2021 at 8:29 p.m.
Thread: Eichel and Reinhart trades
I think Dahlin is still good actually, I don't think he's broken. Just the wrong coaches and poor deployment.
Buffalo needs better coach and assistants.
I think Terry is the wrong owner for this franchise him and his wife had made a lot of ad Choices fro the get go in who should run this team[/quote]

Yeah the owners suck and they get way too involved. Dahlin was broken until Granato fixed him. The only players that haven't been broken were Eichel and Reinhart. Everyone else's career was ruined in some sort of way. This franchise is ****ed for life.[/quote]

Granato does come from a very respectable and intelligent hockey family. I think Buffalo can be turned around in 2 years time, especially with the correct trades of Je, SR, RR. The ****ty thing is Buffalo is in the hardest division in the league, complete opposite of the Canucks
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26, 2021 at 8:15 p.m.
Thread: Eichel and Reinhart trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Snowbelle4444</b></div><div>Pilut isn't in the KHL because of lack of skill. He left the NHL on his own accord because the team was so bad. He's a very solid prospect who just wants a chance to succeed in the league. Never said LE was worth a 1st alone. Boeser isn't playing on the worst team in the league so if he can't score 30 on the Canucks he's definitely never doing that on a team like Buffalo. Reinhart's shooting pct was better than Brock's last season and he was on a much worse team.</div></div>

Exactly Reinhart had an uncharacteristicly higher than normal shooting pct. That's not his norm, it's a one off. Boeser finally has is strength and shot back he may get over 30 next yr and on Buff to as he'd be the best shooter, but Sam on Van won't[/quote]

He's consistently had a high shooting pct. This wasn't a fluke. Again Brock has never played on a team like Buffalo so you can never assume how well he would play. Everyone thought Dahlin was unbustable until Buffalo found a way to break him.[/quote]

I think Dahlin is still good actually, I don't think he's broken. Just the wrong coaches and poor deployment.
Buffalo needs better coach and assistants.
I think Terry is the wrong owner for this franchise him and his wife had made a lot of ad Choices fro the get go in who should run this team
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26, 2021 at 8:02 p.m.
Thread: Eichel and Reinhart trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Snowbelle4444</b></div><div>prime and he was playing on the worst team in the league. Not smart to compare his younger years when he was only 22 or 23 years old. 2 1sts and a cap dump is exactly his value at that age. Adding in a solid prospect like Pilut is honestly too much for Buffalo to give.</div></div>

LE dump isn't a 1st, Pilut isn't a solid prospect he's 25 and still in KHL. Brock Boeser has a better shot than Sam yet he also hasn't hit 30 goals. No that trade isn't fair value. If that's too much to give then it's most definitely too much from Vancouver[/quote]
Pilut isn't in the KHL because of lack of skill. He left the NHL on his own accord because the team was so bad. He's a very solid prospect who just wants a chance to succeed in the league. Never said LE was worth a 1st alone. Boeser isn't playing on the worst team in the league so if he can't score 30 on the Canucks he's definitely never doing that on a team like Buffalo. Reinhart's shooting pct was better than Brock's last season and he was on a much worse team.[/quote]

Exactly Reinhart had an uncharacteristicly higher than normal shooting pct. That's not his norm, it's a one off. Boeser finally has is strength and shot back he may get over 30 next yr and on Buff to as he'd be the best shooter, but Sam on Van won't
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 26, 2021 at 7:58 p.m.
Thread: Eichel and Reinhart trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>prime and he was playing on the worst team in the league. Not smart to compare his younger years when he was only 22 or 23 years old. 2 1sts and a cap dump is exactly his value at that age. Adding in a solid prospect like Pilut is honestly too much for Buffalo to give.</div></div>

LE dump isn't a 1st, Pilut isn't a solid prospect he's 25 and still in KHL. Brock Boeser has a better shot than Sam yet he also hasn't hit 30 goals. No that trade isn't fair value. If that's too much to give then it's most definitely too much from Vancouver[/quote]

Eriksson is a $6 million dump. He’s not even worth wasting a roster spot on. Next year‘s first round pick is the cost of taking on that $6 million for

Don't worry LE won't waive for Buffalo cuz it's only 3 million that he's getting not 6million.. A 1st is not the cost for 6 avv and 3 Mil actual, the cost at most is next yrs 2nd. If not van will bury him ,keep next yrs 1st and may draft 25 goal 50 point forward with their pick ala Reinhart.
If Buffalo can get LA 1st or OTT 1st this year than fantastic. But no other team in this years top 10 is gonna give more than that. Feel free to bookmark this. If I'm wrong I'll give you your props. Btw I like Reinhart.