SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

seaschell1211

Member Since
May 10, 2017
Favourite Team
New York Rangers
2nd Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
Forum Posts
71
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 18, 2018 at 3:53 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 2, 2018 at 2:22 p.m.
Thread: draft and summer
Rangers can't sign Shestyorkin yet. He has another year on his KHL contract. He might need a month or so in the AHL to get used to the American sized rink. I can see Lundqvist being moved once Shestyorkin is signed.

Putting Andersson on the 4th line will not help him develop, he is better playing another season in the AHL. Same with Chytil. Chytil is a center that can play wing but he should be playing center. Keep them both down next season and give them both another year to develop. No need to rush them while we are rebuilding.

I wouldn't get rid of Vesey yet. We can extend him to a 2 year 1.65M contract (matches Fast's remaining contract). I'm not ready to give up on him yet, If he is traded two 4ths is not worth it. We can get a 2nd rounder.

Sign Paul Carey to a 1 year extension because he is a good 4th line center who plays hard and is good depth. He won't cost a lot either.

Spooner will get a longer term than 2 years. He will file for Arbitration most likely. Comparable contract will be close to Galchenyuk who is making 3x4.9M. I'd pay Spooner 4x4.5-4.75M.

Skjei should get 5-6 years but the amount is good.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20, 2018 at 2:34 p.m.
Thread: Nash and McDonagh. Where to send them?
Andersson is not going to play in the NHL this season, if he does he only plays 9 games. NYR GMJG already said the Andersson and Chytil will not be playing this season because he doesn't want to burn a year off either of their contracts. Just wanted you to know this.

Dallas will not give up Honka if the Rangers were able to retain his entire contract, it just wont happen. I, as a Rangers fan, would love to have him but there is no way.

McDonagh will most likely not be traded now after Holden was dealt to Boston earlier today. Unless it is for the right deal, which most likely involves Sergachev or Raddysh. Probably wont be able to get Sergachev though. Plus if McDonagh does goes to Tampa, and the Rangers do not get a cap dump back, you probably have to retain half of his salary as Tamps is tight on cap space.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2018 at 11:17 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2018 at 10:26 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 13, 2018 at 4:15 p.m.
Thread: Mcdonagh, Nash, Grabner, Holden(read Description before comments)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hazard</b></div><div>I agree with you, the only thing I have against you is the fact that you are smart and you know this, yet you still choose to do the unrealistic trade with the leafs. Honestly, even BOS wont agree to this if it means parting ways with their young talent. Your 2 best options are TBL, OTT, DAL, and WSH (&amp; maybe MTL). Good luck</div></div>

Sorry I also forgot to retain 1/2 of McDonagh's salary when i updated this.. My original post was Grundstrom and the 1st with a conditional 2nd round pick in 2018(TOR not SJS(SJS will be the better pick)). I think you are correct in that McDonagh will probably go to Boston or Tampa but there is a chance he goes to Toronto that's why I did this. I see Kapenen being given up before Lilijgren, and no way are The leafs giving up Nylander or Marner, and as a Rangers fan I really want to get a bunch of picks(that would be my goal).
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 13, 2018 at 2:40 p.m.
Thread: Mcdonagh, Nash, Grabner, Holden(read Description before comments)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sagecoll</b></div><div>Rangers say no to all. Remember about 3 weeks ago when most Ranger trades had McDonagh for Marner, That valuation hasn't changed. It's just spread out over multiple pieces.</div></div>
You would say no to 2 2nd round picks for Grabner? I think that's more than fair though considering he most likely will not resign.
Nash deal is fair too, either my comments above or the actual trade. I know we are retaining that's why the Rangers will most likely get 2 picks.
And Holden for a third is more than fair too.

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ADTR55</b></div><div>Can't see the Leafs giving up Marner for an older defenseman who will demand a big salary soon, especially now that Marner has been playing better. It's a risky move for a team that wants to go far in the playoffs. Maybe they would part with Kapanen and a 1st?</div></div>
Could definitely see a 1st Kapanen and Grundstrom and a conditional pick if leafs make the playoffs for McDonagh.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 25, 2017 at 3:19 p.m.
Thread: Toying around with other FWD options
I like the idea of getting Colin Wilson, he doesnt need to be a highlight real player every night, but will add good depth to the roster. As for Granlund i dont see Vancouver trading hime for a couple picks(even though they are higher picks) and as much as i would like Granlund, Hayes will be the 2C as i see it this year, Granlund could be the 3C but why not use Wilson as the 3C? His f% is about what a third line center should have, he can play the wing which could help in other situations if a center becomes availabe and the rangers want him on the wing.

Granlund would be the better of the 2, I could see Puemple and 2 2nd rounders. Doing this however probably means hayes stays at 3C with Miller and Vesey which in my opinion is a great thing.

Plus i would hate having to lose Fast. Even though he will be out the beginning of the season, Nieves can fill the role as the 4th line LW until he returns. There is no need to go out and pay for someone to fill his role.

So all-in-all i think that Granlund would be the one to take of the two deals.