DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
14
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
villenash
Member Since
May 26, 2019
Favourite Team
Nashville Predators
Forum Posts
10250
Posts per Day
5.7
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 11 at 10:54 a.m.
Thread:
Seattle
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KrakenTheCode</b></div><div>Honestly I don't see how this trade makes sense for either side. Florida's right in the middle of their cup window, and Ekblad's a crucial piece of that, so I don't know why they'd consider moving him. Seattle's competitive timeline is farther out in the future, so trading for a rental defenseman doesn't really add up for them either. Not to mention, the Kraken have a good defensive group already but have a need for more scoring up front. Trading one of their top scorers for a blueliner, even one as good as Ekblad, would be counterproductive.</div></div>
FLA gets rid of a guy that is oft-injured with a high cap hit. This allows them to re-sign other guys and add a 20-goal guy that could be a 30-goal guy in the FLA top 6 imo + recouping some picks lost via trades the last few seasons.
SEA adds a top pairing defenseman that would solidify their d-core. They add Stephenson via FA as well who only had 8 less goals than Bjorkstrand over the past two seasons— and Ekblad had 18 over that time period. So they’re technically adding more goals with these moves.
That’s the basic premise. I just FLA should consider moving Ekblad and that Bjorkstrand is an interesting option for them.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 11 at 10:27 a.m.
Thread:
Sam Bennett and Juuse Saros
If Saros comes with an extension, gotta think NSH would be looking at the 2024 1st instead of 2025. But that may change the structure of your proposed deal more than just swapping those picks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:57 p.m.
Thread:
is this a fit
VGK would likely ask for more, but I don’t think he’s untouchable.
I don’t really see why PIT would consider that deal. It would need to be completely reworked imo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 10 at 1:45 p.m.
Thread:
Devils
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I like it.
Only gripe - Mercer ought to get a 2/3-year bridge or a long-term deal. A four-year contract walks him straight to UFA.</div></div>
I originally wanted a 6 x $4.5m or so but couldn’t fit that in with the Amadio and Trenin signings, so I opted for shorter term. I thought 4 would take him to his final year of RFA, with the plan being either sign him long-term or trade him in his final year. So for this attempt, a 2-3 year bridge deal would work the best.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 8:10 p.m.
Thread:
Sharks
I could see a team making that Rutta trade, it just won’t be NSH.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 4:01 p.m.
Thread:
Brady
The NSH is more likely to happen <em>without</em> Saros going the other way
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 3:46 p.m.
Thread:
Pittsburgh
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>they aren't spending 4.5 million for a guy to play 3rd pairing.
Forsberg trade not happening. If they move Jarry out they aren't bringing back cap in a goalie.
Then you end up wasting another 2.5 mil on Brossoit that they don't need.
Just so bad, shows you don't know the team.</div></div>
lol
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bee</b></div><div>8.5 million on the bottom pair you should use that money to improve the forwards</div></div>
Definitely not ideal. I’d consider trading Graves and keeping POJ, but Graves trades are normally met with hostility on this site so I kept him. I’m just not a big fan of this team defensively and tried to add some players that could help out with that— making three d pairs that could go out in nearly all situations.
Edit: I wanted to add Amadio as well, but went with McNabb instead. But if that deal doesn’t happen, then Amadio could be added at a 3x$2.75m or something like that.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>genothegoat</b></div><div>just keep poj anyways vegas would never do that also no need to sign brossoit, blomqvist needs a callup and him and ned would be a solid tandem</div></div>
I’m not a fan of rushing goalies. He only has one year in the AHL. He’s putting up great numbers, but I still wouldn’t rush him at just 22. Keep him there for another season and call up during the year as needed.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bast</b></div><div>Sell me on Joseph. Because the Flames will have a bunch of D-men fighting for the 4–7 spots: Miromanov, Kylington, Pachal, Hanley, Solovyov, Poirieir, Kuznetsov Grushnikov, and Okhotiuk. They all require waivers except Kuznetsov, Grushnikov, and Poirier.
With an outside shot that one of Brzustewicz, Jurmo, or Morin pops in training camp.</div></div>
Honestly just chose CGY as they appear to be adjusting their d-core so this gives them a young guy they can try out at minimal cost. Among the guys you called out, he at least has the most experience over the past two seasons I suppose. If the VGK deal doesn’t happen, id just keep POJ.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 9 at 12:37 p.m.
Thread:
How to re-sign Marchessault and Hanifin
This feels like the summer VGK could pull the trigger on a Karlsson deal. That way they can keep their defensive depth while also re-signing Hanifin and Marchessault. Roy can play 3C.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 8 at 11:40 p.m.
Thread:
new boot goofin
Why would you trade a top 10 pick for a 3rd liner?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3 at 1:32 p.m.
Thread:
top 5 highest paid 24-25 NO ELC
Shuffle the contracts and add Novak at $800k and Hagel at $1.5m
And if you allow yourself retained contracts, could add Hanifin and Tanev
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 2 at 2:47 p.m.
Thread:
unrealistic offszn
NSH isn’t trading a 1st for a LHD like Romanov— only makes sense for a RHD or C
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 1 at 2:13 p.m.
Thread:
Youtful Pens Best Case Scenario
Feels like an easy accept by NSH. If it doesn’t work out, NSH could likely trade him with an additional 50% retention for at least a 3rd. So changing a 4th to a 3rd sounds like a no-brainer.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 30 at 11:05 a.m.
Thread:
Next year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Viqsi</b></div><div>Probably works for the Jackets although a 2nd would be preferred and possibly doable with other teams.</div></div>
I’ve seen a lot of varying value on Boqvist on this site, anywhere from a late 1st to a 5th, so I went in the middle.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>We’ll take glass and we should even be avle to outbid that for Tomasino. How does Heineman + Ylonen sound?</div></div>
I prefer the versatility, size, and experience of Luostarinen more. If Tomasino ends up having more value, I’d just try to get a mid pick out of FLA in the deal. I think Luostarinen is a player that could really excel in NSH. And Tomasino just seems to be bouncing around, so give him a fresh chance elsewhere.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nhl_oilers</b></div><div>If we can’t resign Henrique, I would take Glass in Edmonton! That is a very interesting deal for Florida… Tomasino was very good in the OHL. I would like to say they would take that. Gives them cap to do some resigns, and gives them a good young project, that could turn into one hell of a player.</div></div>
Would a $2.5m cap hit not be too much for EDM?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 27 at 4:24 p.m.
Thread:
Re-Evaluate The Evaluator
I can’t see NSH saying no to that— Boqvist could do well in Brunette’s system.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 27 at 4:23 p.m.
Thread:
Fantasy ing
NSH isn’t trading Lauzon in a lateral move at best and giving away a 3rd in the process
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 27 at 10:27 a.m.
Thread:
Summer fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>You see the issue here right? Necas will end up with 65-ish points again this year. Evangelista would be lucky to his 40 from here. The price for such a substantial upgrade will be expensive. You have Saros, and everyone knows that Trotz was willing to move Askarov at the draft last year. It's as likely Necas finds a form of consistency and hits 80-90, hell maybe even 100 if Rod doesn't come back as it is for Evangelista to hit 60, or L'Heureux to hit 50. This seems more like a misunderstanding of Necas on your part than an overvalue on my part</div></div>
It’s as likely that Necas hits 100 points as it is for Evangelista to get 60… ok I’m gonna bow out on this one. No point in continuing if this is what you actually believe. Just keep him then lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 27 at 10:17 a.m.
Thread:
Summer fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Why wouldn't they? Necas is a 70 point player and Nashville needs scoring, still sitting outside the top 10 in that regard while being solid across the board elsewhere. Necas improves them, Carolina get good young players back for their dynamic winger, where's the issue here?</div></div>
He has one season of 71 points and may not even hit 60 this season. Evangelista could be that same 60-70 point player and they keep one of, if not the best goalie prospect + a potential 50 point middle 6 agitator in the process. Necas is good, but he’s not a game breaker by any means and NSH doesn’t need to trade their best young players for a player like Necas. I’d much rather keep the younger players. I’m not opposed to trading for Necas, but this proposal would be a no from NSH. Just because NSH is having a good season doesn’t mean Trotz is going to blow it up by trading a bunch of young guys to try and win now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 27 at 10:07 a.m.
Thread:
Summer fun
Do you honestly think NSH considers that deal?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 23 at 3:10 p.m.
Thread:
Admiral Trade
The connections between the NSH organization and the SJS prospects are interesting, but there is no chance this deal ever occurs. Both NSH prospects are two years younger and L’Heureux is the most promising prospect involved in this trade. Just no real incentive for NSH to consider this deal. I prefer L’Heureux to Bordeleau and Schaefer to Wiesblatt.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 19 at 7:36 p.m.
Thread:
OffseasonPracticeSEA
NSH pass.
Not trading a young RHD that was just signed for an overpaid, bottom six winger when McCarron and Smith are already on the team and fill the same/similar role.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 17 at 10:19 p.m.
Thread:
If land celebrini
I can’t see NSH trading a 2nd for a LHD— and that’s without taking on Armia in the process.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 15 at 12:14 p.m.
Thread:
Summer of Staios
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chabotrrorr</b></div><div>Norris, Forsberg, 1rst (BOS) 2024 and 4th (OTT) 2025?</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BsInOttawa</b></div><div>Norris & Forsberg for Saros what you're after?</div></div>
Norris is untradeable until he can prove his shoulder issues are behind him.
Edit: typo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 12:33 p.m.
Thread:
Continuing to tear it down
I can’t imagine a team trading for Mangiapane and his near $6m cap hit
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 11:08 a.m.
Thread:
Who does 2 work for
Trading Saros for a LHD prospect doesn’t make sense for NSH. They would be looking at Centers and RHD, in that order. And taking on Husso is a pure cap dump which should be reflected in the trade, which I currently don’t believe it is.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 12 at 6:45 p.m.
Thread:
Sharks Get Bigger Without Compromising Rebuild
Gotta think NSH would’ve kept Trenin at that price. Same with Carrier— I doubt he goes for that contract in a worse tax state on a much worse team.
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com