SalarySwishSalarySwish

Salary Cap Solved!

Created by: RamonDaze
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 3, 2017
Published: May 3, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Crazy, won't happen and I wouldn't do it. It was fun to think about how to resolve the cap & poach an RFA from the Blues.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$4,500,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Eichel, Jack
  2. 2018 2nd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Buffalo 2017 1st rd
2.
CHI
VGK
  1. Krüger, Marcus
Additional Details:
Expansion draft
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the ANA
2020
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$73,000,000$69,587,295$3,558,000$3,607,500$3,412,705
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
RW, C
UFA - 2
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 6
$925,000$925,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C
UFA - 1
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, C
UFA - 2
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$925,000$925,000
C
UFA - 2
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$863,333$863,333
C, RW
UFA - 1
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 6
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$872,500$872,500
LD
UFA - 2
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
$612,500$612,500
G
UFA - 1
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
UFA - 5
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

May 3, 2017 at 5:20 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 462
Eichel is more valuable than Kane. Younger, cheaper, more premium position, equal ceiling. Nope
May 3, 2017 at 5:33 p.m.
#2
NateElder12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2016
Posts: 5,736
Likes: 801
yeah flip those picks and add Debrincat & Hartman and maybe they'd think about it but probably not
May 3, 2017 at 5:37 p.m.
#3
Lets Go Blues
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 6,778
Likes: 4,333
How exactly do you plan to poach Parayko? I see no compensation if it was an offer sheet. Any offer sheet would be matched. Blues would put Parayko in a body bag rather than see him in a Hawks sweater.
May 3, 2017 at 5:37 p.m.
#4
GJWKINGS
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 593
Likes: 98
Quoting: Jbarre6
Eichel is more valuable than Kane. Younger, cheaper, more premium position, equal ceiling. Nope


Here is my frustration with the naysayers for trades like this. Kane is a 3x stanley cup champion in the prime of his career. I'm sure that has no value to a young team? I get it. cap issues, younger, cheaper, all that, and it may well be valid; but to just say I'll go with the young dude all the time is silly. Just my thoughts.
Sharp_10 and CD282 liked this.
May 3, 2017 at 5:46 p.m.
#5
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 9,889
Quoting: KingsGKG
Quoting: Jbarre6
Eichel is more valuable than Kane. Younger, cheaper, more premium position, equal ceiling. Nope


Here is my frustration with the naysayers for trades like this. Kane is a 3x stanley cup champion in the prime of his career. I'm sure that has no value to a young team? I get it. cap issues, younger, cheaper, all that, and it may well be valid; but to just say I'll go with the young dude all the time is silly. Just my thoughts.


That's the question right??? Jack Eichel's BEST CASE POSSIBLE hope is to be as good as Kane is now. That's not an exaggeration either! But $10.5M in cap gets you many different quality supporting pieces and 8 years of additional play are very much a factor. Typically the argument is the best player in any trade is who wins the trade, but this a very different type of trade.
See All